similar to: experimental changes pushed out

Hi everyone, I''ve pushed out my current kernel git tree to a new branch called integration-test. This is meant for integration testing only and should not be run by anyone who doesn''t love crashes. I''ve pulled together a lot of important work from a lot of different people. It includes: The new inode number allocator Delayed inode and directory item updates Scrub,

Hello, Ok here are all my fsync changes, including the fix for the put_transaction stuff that I posted earlier. I figure it'll be easier to just commit it as one thing then each individual peice. The additional thing that I did was add a radix tree that tracks the current outstanding transactions. I also added a field to the in memory btrfs inode that keeps track of the last transaction

Hi Linus, My for-linus branch has a one line fix: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git for-linus Sage hit a deadlock with ceph on btrfs, and Josef tracked it down to a regression in our initial rc1 pull. When doing nocow writes we were sometimes starting a transaction with locks held. Josef Bacik (1) commits (+1/-0): Btrfs: release path before starting

We''re going to use this flag EXTENT_DEFRAG to indicate which range belongs to defragment so that we can implement snapshow-aware defrag: We set the EXTENT_DEFRAG flag when dirtying the extents that need defragmented, so later on writeback thread can differentiate between normal writeback and writeback started by defragmentation. This patch is used for the latter one. Originally patch

Hi, If i set strict allocate = yes in samba to speed up the transfer of a mssql database dump, then btrfs does not compress the file. I have tried it also by just copying a small file in Windows to the samba share and the same. I have tried btrfs mount options autodefrag and then btrfs fi defrag -c and the file still does not get compressed. I have tried kernels 3.6.11, 3.8 and 3.10.7 on FC16

I noticed that btrfs fi defrag -c<method> can''t be used to compress files unless they are fragmented. This patch corrects the problem, by informing should_defrag_range if compression is enabled, and skipping tests for extent and adjacent extents if it is. Andrew Mahone (1): btrfs: ignore unfragmented file checks in defrag when compression enabled fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 10

I noticed while running xfstests 83 that if we didn''t have enough space to delete our inode the orphan cleanup would just loop. This is because it keeps finding the same orphan item and keeps trying to kill it but can''t because we don''t get an error back from iput for deleting the inode. So keep track of the last guy we tried to kill, if it''s the same as the

V2 -> V3: set ''err'' to -ENOMEM when kmalloc() fails. Thanks to Tao. V1 -> V2: Move kmalloc() before mutex_lock(), suggested by Arjan. file_remove_suid() should be called with i_mutex held, file_update_time() too. So move them after mutex_lock(). Plus, check the return value of kmalloc(). Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com> Cc: Arjan

V1 -> V2: Move kmalloc() before mutex_lock(), suggested by Arjan. file_remove_suid() should be called with i_mutex held, file_update_time() too. So move them after mutex_lock(). Plus, check the return value of kmalloc(). Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com> Cc: Arjan <arjan@infradead.org> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Yan Zheng

I noticed a few days ago that btrfs fi defrag -cXXX can not be used to compress files unless they are fragmented. The attached patch passes the compression flag to should_defrag_range, where it disables the adjacent-extent and extent size checks if set. The inline/sparse extent check is not modified - I assumed it would not be useful to compress inline extents. -- Andrew Mahone andrew DOT mahone

Hi, the $subj warning appears sometimes in syslog, in my case when xfstests/209 runs looped. The minimal reproducer is looped mkfs+mount. The message comes from disk-io.c btree_readpage_end_io_hook(): 581 if (check_tree_block_fsid(root, eb)) { 582 printk_ratelimited(KERN_INFO "btrfs bad fsid on block %llu\n", 583 (unsigned long

Two files in the different subvolumes may have the same inode id, so The rb-tree which is used to manage the defragment object must take it into account. This patch fix this problem. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/file.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c

When testing with max_extents=4k, we enospc out really really early. The reason for this is we really overwhelm the system with our worst case calculation. When we try to flush delalloc, we don''t want everybody to wait around forever, so we wake up the waiters when we''ve done some of the work in hopes that its enough work to get everything they need done. The problem with this

Alex pointed out the consequences after a transaction is not committed when a subvolume is deleted, so in case of a crash before an actual commit happens will let the subvolume reappear. Original post: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg22088.html Josef''s objections: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg22256.html While there''s no need to do a full commit for

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Calvin Walton <calvin.walton@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 03:30 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> I use btrfs on most of my volumes on my laptop, and I''ve always felt >> booting was very slow, but definitely sure is slow, is starting up >> Google Chrome: >> >> encrypted ext4: ~20s >> btrfs: ~2:11s

After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to try btrfs again. Performance with the current "for-linux-min" branch and big metadata is much better. The only problem (?) I''m still seeing is a warning that seems to occur from time to time: [87703.784552] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [87703.789759] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2103

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:12:58PM +0100, Olivier Hault wrote: > For a while, I wonder if it would be possible to defrag guest fs > from the host. I can see two flavors a) offline defrag, b) online > defrag of the guest fs > > I there already solutions of works in progress to support those > operations ? We don't support this right now. However it is certainly something we

I need everybody to go over this with a fine toothed comb since it is a pretty big change. I think it is right and it seems to come out right, but if it''s not it will mean we screw up O_DIRECT on snapshotted files with preallocated extents, so please, make sure it is correct :). --- Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: rework can_nocow_odirect We are always doing the file extent lookup in here

Hi, I planned to boost my btrfs performance today. here some errors I met: my ''btrfs filesystem show'' result: ~ # btrfs filesystem show failed to read /dev/sr0 Label: none uuid: 9b9aa9d9-760e-445c-a0ab-68e102d9f02e Total devices 1 FS bytes used 36.59GB devid 1 size 49.52GB used 49.52GB path /dev/sda6 Label: none uuid: 559dec06-4fd0-47c1-97b8-cc4fa6153fa0

I was flipping through the code recently and noticed that we still have the double whammy of allocating dir entry positions with parent_dir->counter++ and that weird setting of f_pos to 2^31-1. So after enough creates (and deletes :)) in a directory we end up with an entry item whose key is past that value. f_pos gets rewound instead of being set to that magical EOF. readdir() gets stuck