similar to: online resizing (including shrinking) pushed out

Hello everyone, Btrfs v0.10 is now available for download from: http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/ Btrfs is still in an early alpha state, and the disk format is not finalized. v0.10 introduces a new disk format, and is not compatible with v0.9. The core of this release is explicit back references for all metadata blocks, data extents, and directory items. These are a crucial building

Hello everyone, Btrfs v0.10 is now available for download from: http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/ Btrfs is still in an early alpha state, and the disk format is not finalized. v0.10 introduces a new disk format, and is not compatible with v0.9. The core of this release is explicit back references for all metadata blocks, data extents, and directory items. These are a crucial building

E.g. btrfsctl -r -4000m /dev/sda5 results in: ioctl:: Inappropriate ioctl for device Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10 Kernel: 2.6.35-22-generic According to the Synaptic Package manager, the version of btrfs-tools is 0.19+20100601-3 Other information that can be of interest: - I started Ubuntu on a live CD - before invoking the btrfsctl command I invoked apt-get update. I have googled but have not

Add man/btrfsctl.8.in Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@gmail.com> --- man/btrfsctl.8.in | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 man/btrfsctl.8.in diff --git a/man/btrfsctl.8.in b/man/btrfsctl.8.in new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e11f46a --- /dev/null +++ b/man/btrfsctl.8.in @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@

''btrfsctl -A /path/to/device/file'' would only scan for a valid btrfs on the device using volume recognition helpers. --- btrfsctl.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/btrfsctl.c b/btrfsctl.c index 66c4e89..61020de 100644 --- a/btrfsctl.c +++ b/btrfsctl.c @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ #include

Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@gmail.com> --- man/Makefile | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ man/btrfsck.8.in | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 man/Makefile create mode 100644 man/btrfsck.8.in diff --git a/man/Makefile b/man/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2665dd1 --- /dev/null +++ b/man/Makefile

Split CFLAGS into CFLAGS (user part) and AM_CFLAGS (not-so-user part; variable name taken from automake, but otherwise no relation). Also add LDFLAGS. This allows me to use `make CFLAGS="-O2 -fPIE" LDFLAGS="-pie"` without dropping the other important (AM_CFLAGS) flags. Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de> --- btrfs-progs/Makefile | 17

Hello, I''ve just pulled btrfs-progs from the new git repo git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git However, when I come to make it fails like so: gcc -Wp,-MMD,./.btrfsctl.o.d,-MT,btrfsctl.o -Wall -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -Werror -Os -c btrfsctl.c gcc -g -Werror -Os -o btrfsctl btrfsctl.o ctree.o disk-io.o radix-tree.o extent-tree.o

add man/btrfs-image.8.in Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <bergwolf@gmail.com> --- man/Makefile | 5 ++++- man/btrfs-image.8.in | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644 man/btrfs-image.8.in diff --git a/man/Makefile b/man/Makefile index 2665dd1..b7a7340 100644 --- a/man/Makefile +++ b/man/Makefile @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@

Hello all This patch tries to remove a few bugs from smbmount. It would be nice to get some testing+feedback on this from others using smbmount and possibly get these things fixed for the next release of samba. It does the following: * Change lib/debug.c to allow changing your mind on being interactive. A second call to setup_logging should now replace the effects of a previous call. (hmm,

If I scan I device with a btrfs with -A, it finds it: (~/btrfs-progs-unstable) sudo ./btrfsctl -A /dev/sda5 operation complete Btrfs v0.19-1-g4f89b6e-dirty But when I do a "scan all devices", it can''t find my btrfs on /dev/sda5: (~/btrfs-progs-unstable) sudo ./btrfsctl -a Scanning for Btrfs filesystems failed to read /dev/sr0 I''m using btrfs-progs-unstable version

Hi I am using create_resource to create a dir and then mount it. I am using two create_resources and want one to be completed before other. $mount_point = hiera(''test::mount_point'', []) $defaults = { ''ensure'' => ''directory'', } $mountit = hiera(''test::mountit'') create_resources (file, $mount_point, $defaults)

Hi, Let me know if this is the wrong place to ask... I''m using Fedora 12 x86_64, mostly with the newer 21.6.32 kernel, and have a single btrfs filesystem within a 120Gb partition. I''d like to extend the space btrfs can use. One option is presumably add a new device to btrfs, but I was hoping to simple resize the existing partition to say 160Gb. With ext4 I might do

Hi all, below a configuration for udev/initramfs which I propose to scan the block devices looking for a multi-volume btrfs filesystem. Btrfs has the capability to span a file-system on multiple device. In order to do that, the involved devices have to be "registered" in the kernel. In order to do that there are two options: # btrfs device scan <device> (or the old

In my new bash script, I'm doing what I think is a very simple rsync command the way I'm used to doing it. I just do a lot of setup and checking before I get to it. When I run it, it gets very unhappy with me. It's probably something very simple. I need to build the rsync command in a string so that some things can go away - like if my variables DRY_RUN and DELETE are undefined,

On Tue, 2018-09-11 at 12:56 -0400, Kevin Korb via rsync wrote: > --timeout is about network connection timeouts. You aren't using the > network so it doesn't apply at all. Even if you were networking an > unmounted filesystem is an empty directory as far as rsync is > concerned > and rsync would treat it that way with no idea that you intended to > have > something

From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org> $ LDFLAGS=-static make gcc -lpthread -g -O0 -o btrfs btrfs.o btrfs_cmds.o scrub.o \ ctree.o disk-io.o radix-tree.o extent-tree.o print-tree.o root-tree.o dir-item.o file-item.o inode-item.o inode-map.o crc32c.o rbtree.o extent-cache.o extent_io.o volumes.o utils.o btrfs-list.o btrfslabel.o -static -luuid scrub.o: In function

When compiling on armv7 it becomes clear from the compiler warnings that the current code is wrong. The bitmap has to be allocated in virtual memory, so use size_t to describe the length of the bitmap. When changing the length of the bitmap, compute the new size as an unsigned 64 bit int, and then check whether or not it is too large to fit into size_t before casting it. ---

i am running freebsd 4.6.2 i am using this command to mount a windows share from windows xp mount_smbfs //user@server/share_name /path/to/mount_point and everytime i get this message mount_smbfs: can't get server address: ssyerr = operation timed out i have also tried this command mount -t smbfs //user@server/share_name /path/to/mount_point and get the same message can any one give me some

Hi Andreas, Any plans to do a release of the online resizing patch for ext3-1.0? I've put off asking about this until Al Viro's superblock handling and other fixes were done, but now that LVM 1.0.1 seems to be approaching a stable and -linus/-ac mergeable state, this would certainly make deploying ext3+LVM a lot simpler. Regards, Bill Rugolsky