similar to: Data=ordered - what for?

Hi! Is there plans for fragmentation analyzing/reporting and online defragmentation tools for btrfs? And what about delayed allocation? Thanks!

What about multiple errors detection with crc32? Is it work? Thanks.

As far as I know, btrfs comes from "btree file system", but why does btrfs pronounce "butter-eff-ess"? -- Wang Shaoyan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Changing the subject since this is rather Btrfs specific now. On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:41 AM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017, 11:55 AM Mark Haney <mark.haney at neonova.net> wrote: >> >>> To be honest, I'd not try a btrfs volume on a notebook SSD. I did that on >>> a >>> couple of

Hi, I have 4 machines, all converted to BTRFS about 6 months ago, now all running Ubuntu Quantal with kernel 3.5.0-17 The matter is that all these machines are now getting slower and slower everyday, every disk access causing the disk to be 100% busy for long periods, to the point that I''m now seriously considering migrating everything back to ext4... From the start BTRFS was "not

Hi, We did some performance test and found the create/delete files performance of btrfs is very poor. The test is that we create 50000 files and measure the file-create time first, and then delete these 50000 files and measure the file-delete time. (The attached file is the reproduce program) The result is following: (Unit: second) Create file performance BtrFS Ext4 Total times:

(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface). On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:20:20 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29302 > > Summary: Null pointer dereference with large max_sectors_kb > Product: IO/Storage > Version: 2.5 > Kernel

Hi Chris. I think it is needed to call mark_inode_dirty() when file size expands in order to flush metadata updates to HDD through sync() syscall or background_writeout(). Thanks. Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp> diff -Nrup linux-2.6.29-rc3.org/fs/btrfs/file.c linux-2.6.29-rc3/fs/btrfs/file.c --- linux-2.6.29-rc3.org/fs/btrfs/file.c 2009-02-02

I thought I would try btrfs on a new installation of f14. yes, I know its experimental but stable so it seemed to be a good time to try it. I am not sure if I have missed something out of all my searching but am I correct in thinking that currently: I. it is not possible to boot from a snapshot of the operating system and, in particular, the yum snapshots cannot be used for

Hello everyone, Btrfs v0.16 is available for download, please see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/ for download links and project information. v0.16 has a shiny new disk format, and is not compatible with filesystems created by older Btrfs releases. But, it should be the fastest Btrfs yet, with a wide variety of scalability fixes and new features. There were quite a few contributors this time

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Calvin Walton <calvin.walton@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 03:30 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> I use btrfs on most of my volumes on my laptop, and I''ve always felt >> booting was very slow, but definitely sure is slow, is starting up >> Google Chrome: >> >> encrypted ext4: ~20s >> btrfs: ~2:11s

I want to eliminate the COW feature on all of my OS files. It is a nice feature for user files, but I don''t see a clear benefit for the actual OS files. And I suspect that COW induced fragmentation is causing or aggravating problems with my system including the boot open_ctree problem. I had planned to recursively chattr these files to "nodatacow" status but then I ran

Hi, Doing some extensive benchmarks on BTRFS, I encountered a kernel bug in BTRFS (as reported in dmesg) Maybe the information below can help you making btrfs better. Situation Doing an intensive sequential write on a SAS 3TB disk drive (SEAGATE ST33000652SS) with 128 threads with Sysbench. Device is connected through an HBA. Blocksize was 256k ; Kernel is 3.3.0 (x86_64) ; Btrfs is version

I''ve been working to try to improve the write-ahead log''s performance, and I found that the bottleneck addresses in the checksum items, especially when we want to make a random write on a large file, e.g a 4G file. Then a idea for this suggested by Chris is to use sub transaction ids and just to log the part of inode that had changed since either the last log commit or the last

hi All, I''m new on the list. System: Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 13.04 Release: 13.04 Codename: raring Linux ctu 3.8.0-19-generic #30-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 1 16:35:23 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux The symptom is the same with Saucy 3.9 kernel. ii btrfs-tools 0.20~git20130524~650e656-0daily13~raring1 amd64 Checksumming Copy on

Hi there, I am newbie and recently started using btrfs. Now facing a weird problem. FWIW, I am on archlinux, kenel v3.8.0, having Btrfs v0.20-rc1. After an abnormal reboot, getting these errors while boot: systemd.fsck[289]: checking extents systemd.fsck[289]: checking fs roots systemd.fsck[289]: checking root refs systemd.fsck[289]: found 23728128 bytes used err is 0 systemd.fsck[289]: total

----- Forwarded Message ----- From: "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com> To: "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@redhat.com> Cc: virt-devel@redhat.com, "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 9:20:51 AM Subject: [virt-devel] btrfs NOCOW for VM disk images Hi, In upstream QEMU we''re discussing patches that set the NOCOW flag

SAMSUNG SSD 830 Series CPU0: Intel® Core(TM) i7-2820QM CPU @ 2.30GHz (fam: 06, model: 2a, stepping: 07) 8GB RAM (quite heavily tested, not recently, with several days of memtest) kernel 3.11.1-200.fc19.x86_64 running on baremetal btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20130308git704a08c-1.fc19.x86_64 Today I did a scrub on a btrfs volume, with no message or errors in console or dmesg or journal. Immediately after

Add ''-C'' (nocow) option to vhd-util create. Btrfs has terrible performance when hosting VM images, even more when the guest in those VM are also using btrfs as file system. One way to mitigate this bad performance is to turn off COW attributes on VM files (since having copy on write for this kind of data is not useful). According to ''chattr'' manpage, NOCOW

I''ve run a little wired benchmark on comparing Btrfs v0.19 and XFS: There are 2000 directories and each directory contains 1000 files. The workload randomly stat a file or chmod a file for 2000000 times. And the number of stat and chmod are 50% and 50%. I monitor the number of disk read requests #Disk Write Requests, #Disk Read Requests, #Disk Write Sectors, #Disk Read