similar to: [PATCH] IGET: Remove initialisation of read_inode() super op from BTRFS

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches similar to: "[PATCH] IGET: Remove initialisation of read_inode() super op from BTRFS"

2002 Dec 06
2
[patch] fix the ext3 data=journal unmount bug
This patch fixes the data loss which can occur when unmounting a data=journal ext3 filesystem. The core problem is that the VFS doesn't tell the filesystem enough about what is happening. ext3 _needs_ to know the difference between regular memory-cleansing writeback and sync-for-data-integrity purposes. (These two operations are really quite distinct, and the kernel has got it wrong for
2002 Dec 15
2
problem with Andrew's patch ext3
Hello Andrew, I patched 2.4.20 with your patch found out on http://lwn.net/Articles/17447/ and I have a big problem with: once server is booted on 2.4.20 with your patch, when I want to reboot with /sbin/reboot, server makes a Segmentation fault and it crashs. I tested it on 50-60 servers and it is the same problem. I tested kernel 2.4.20 without your patch: no problem. # uname -a Linux XXXXXX
2008 Oct 15
1
[PATCH] ocfs2: Wrap inode block reads in a dedicated function.
Ooops, last one didn't CC ocfs2-devel. On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 06:16:15PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote: > @@ -232,25 +231,17 @@ int ocfs2_populate_inode(struct inode *inode, struct ocfs2_dinode *fe, > ocfs2_mount_local(osb) || !ocfs2_stack_supports_plocks()) > use_plocks = 0; > > - /* this means that read_inode cannot create a superblock inode > - * today. change if
2003 Dec 01
0
[PATCH] 2.4.23 ext3 warning
Kill warning if CONFIG_QUOTA is disabled. --- linux-2.4.23/fs/ext3/super.c.orig Fri Nov 28 21:04:40 2003 +++ linux-2.4.23/fs/ext3/super.c Sun Nov 30 12:16:00 2003 @@ -449,7 +449,6 @@ } static struct dquot_operations ext3_qops; -static int (*old_sync_dquot)(struct dquot *dquot); static struct super_operations ext3_sops = { read_inode: ext3_read_inode, /* BKL held */ @@ -1773,6 +1772,8 @@
2001 Aug 13
0
(no subject)
>From nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Thu Feb 1 03:51:36 2001 >Return-Path: <nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net> Received: from usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net (usw-outbound.sourceforge.net [216.136.171.194]) by gateway.camelot.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id DAA11596 for <jareth@camelot.co.jp>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 03:51:35 +0900 X-Authentication-Warning:
2001 Aug 13
0
(no subject)
>From nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Wed Jan 31 09:21:55 2001 >Return-Path: <nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net> Received: from usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net (usw-outbound.sourceforge.net [216.136.171.194]) by gateway.camelot.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id JAA03106 for <jareth@camelot.co.jp>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:21:53 +0900 X-Authentication-Warning:
2007 Apr 18
0
Ext3-users Digest, Vol 38, Issue 10
Hi, my program works well with fedora-2 .with fedora-5 it's gives following errors.. get_it_i_say.c:549: warning: implicit declaration of function 'strcmp' cc -o giis dir.o file.o get_it_i_say.o group.o init.o inode.o main.o searchnupdate.o uninit.o inode.o: In function `read_inode':inode.c:(.text+0x202): undefined reference to `S_ISDIR' inode.o: In function
2001 Mar 23
0
[linux-lvm] EXT2-fs panic (device lvm(58,0)):
Al writes: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > If this is the case, then all of the other zero initializations can be > > removed as well. I figured that if most of the fields were being > > zeroed, then ones _not_ being zeroed would lead to this problem. > > Other zero initializations in inode->u certainly can be > removed, but whether it's
2004 Sep 04
0
[PATCH] remove ocfs_put_inode
this doesn't do anything but noisy debug printks anymore Index: src/super.c =================================================================== --- src/super.c (revision 1426) +++ src/super.c (working copy) @@ -196,9 +196,7 @@ static struct super_operations ocfs_sops = { .statfs = ocfs_statfs, - .put_inode = ocfs_put_inode, .clear_inode = ocfs_clear_inode, - //put_inode =
2007 Aug 23
2
give me some works
hello, Chris In the next several months, I will have a lot of spare time. I will be happy if you assign some work to me. I have learn linux kernel for years but only fix a few small bugs in IP stack. In the past few months, I read some EXT4/VFS codes. I began reading source of btrfs ten days ago and have read it twice now. Regards YZ
2010 Apr 19
0
[PATCH 08/12] Btrfs: Introduce global metadata reservation
Reserve metadata space for extent tree, checksum tree and root tree Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> --- diff -urp 8/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 9/fs/btrfs/ctree.h --- 8/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 2010-04-18 10:26:38.327697818 +0800 +++ 9/fs/btrfs/ctree.h 2010-04-18 10:30:01.883697869 +0800 @@ -682,21 +682,15 @@ struct btrfs_space_info { u64 bytes_reserved; /* total bytes the allocator has
2009 Feb 02
5
[PATCH] btrfs: call mark_inode_dirty when i_size is updated
Hi Chris. I think it is needed to call mark_inode_dirty() when file size expands in order to flush metadata updates to HDD through sync() syscall or background_writeout(). Thanks. Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp> diff -Nrup linux-2.6.29-rc3.org/fs/btrfs/file.c linux-2.6.29-rc3/fs/btrfs/file.c --- linux-2.6.29-rc3.org/fs/btrfs/file.c 2009-02-02
2008 Jul 20
26
[PATCH] NFS support for btrfs - v2
Hi, Here''s an implementation of NFS support for btrfs. It does not work in one particular case as described in http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg00298.html. This uses the btrfs_iget helper introduced previously. Comments ? --- Signed-off-by: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@gmail.com> diff -r 3f0eee804974 Makefile --- a/Makefile Thu Jun 26 10:34:20 2008 -0400
2009 Aug 24
0
[PATCH] Btrfs: proper metadata -ENOSPC handling
This patch finally gives us full proper -ENOSPC handling for btrfs. Now whenever you do a btrfs_start_transaction, you must specify the number of items you are planning to add/delete/modify. The worst case number of blocks that could be modified by changing that number of items will be calculated and checked against the amount of free space in the space_info where the root you are modifying
2008 Dec 22
56
[git patches] Ocfs2 patches for merge window, batch 2/3
Hi, This is the second batch of Ocfs2 patches intended for the merge window. The 1st batch were sent out previously: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/19/280 The bulk of this set is comprised of Jan Kara's patches to add quota support to Ocfs2. Many of the quota patches are to generic code, which I carried to make merging of the Ocfs2 support easier. All of the non-ocfs2 patches should have