similar to: Again kea DHCP-Server

Well? I?m not convinced KEA can?t be simple DHCP, though I understand that one would never know that from reading the KEA documentation. The following is a complete KEA configuration suitable to do a single subnet. In fact, you could probably get away with slightly less. I?ve replaced the unique addresses from my environment with placeholders (e.g. <network/mask>), but otherwise, this is a

On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 18:34:44 +0000 Owen DeLong via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Well? I?m not convinced KEA can?t be simple DHCP, though I understand > that one would never know that from reading the KEA documentation. > > The following is a complete KEA configuration suitable to do a single > subnet. In fact, you could probably get away with slightly less. I?ve

On 11/2/23 05:41, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > I never said that Kea couldn't be used with Samba, but I can get those > 56 lines of Kea conf into 7 lines of dnsmasq config. Old bump of thread: But... what you can't do with dnsmasq is send dynamic updates to bind to keep your subnet name resolution straight or handle failover of that function. I'm not a fan of the

On Nov 2, 2023, at 03:41, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 18:34:44 +0000 Owen DeLong via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Well? I?m not convinced KEA can<x-msg://100/#link>?????? <external.png><https://summary.us1.defend.egress.com/v3/summary?ref=email&crId=65437d017c19b16f36fa287b&lang=en> On Wed, 1

On 2/1/2018 9:28 AM, Laine Stump wrote: > On 02/01/2018 09:22 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:19:11AM -0500, Laine Stump wrote: >>> On 01/30/2018 07:37 PM, john@bluemarble.net wrote: >>>> I'm trying to use virt-manager and qemu/kvm on Arch Linux. The box I'm >>>> using is also the router for my house. It runs a kea DHCP

On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:19:11AM -0500, Laine Stump wrote: > On 01/30/2018 07:37 PM, john@bluemarble.net wrote: > > I'm trying to use virt-manager and qemu/kvm on Arch Linux. The box I'm > > using is also the router for my house. It runs a kea DHCP server. When I > > try to start the default NAT network, it can't start dnsmasq because that > > port is

I'm trying to use virt-manager and qemu/kvm on Arch Linux. The box I'm using is also the router for my house. It runs a kea DHCP server. When I try to start the default NAT network, it can't start dnsmasq because that port is already bound. Is there a way to have it not bind on this interface? I see there is an except-on statement in the dnsmasq.conf, but I can't add lines to that

On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >> Hi folks, >> >> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be >> the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. >> Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba

On 30-04-2023 10:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will >>> be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released,

Hi I'm having a problem with the bcmxcp_usb driver FSD command: everything seems to work apart from: upsmon -c fsd Environment: Ubuntu 7.04, nut 2.0.5-1, nut-usb 2.0.5-1, Powerware 3105 UPS. upsd appears to send the FSD command to the UPS, upsmon then runs my NOTIFYCMD (which halts my PC) but the UPS just doesn't turn off. Here are the /var/log/daemon.log entries: Jul 24 23:13:16

Replying here as well, since this is a frequent question. I uploaded the updated samba packages to the official debian archives in parallel with updating my repository - exactly the same source packages as are used to build samba for my repository. 4.18 should already be available on sid/unstable, I think. In trixie/testing it will migrate within 5 days if nothing other breaks. Updated bookworm

Hi Peter, Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: > Hi folks, > > I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be > the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. > Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba backports > for Bookworm? > > I saw a post from Michael Tokarev in this list a

Hi! I've uploaded samba packages for debian & ubuntu in my repository, to include the fix for recent login/trust issue with 07/2023 windows updates. 4.16 packages will also be available later today (build is in progress now). http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/ JFYI. Thanks, /mjt

Hi folks, I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba backports for Bookworm? I saw a post from Michael Tokarev in this list a while ago, that there probably wont be a Samba 4.18 for Debian Bullseye. I also saw another post about

Am 04.07.2024 um 21:00 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 20:27:37 +0200 > Paul Leiber via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Dear Samba list, >> >> I have a Samba instance running as an ad-dc on debian bullseye. > > I suggest you upgrade, bullseye goes EOL in three weeks. Aww, my system is already on bookworm, not on bullseye.

On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 20:27:37 +0200 Paul Leiber via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Dear Samba list, > > I have a Samba instance running as an ad-dc on debian bullseye. I suggest you upgrade, bullseye goes EOL in three weeks. > Some > time ago, I changed the standard installation to backports with > > apt -t bullseye-backports install samba I normally

I have a test setup like this: host ======= *puppet-idc*: Ubuntu 12.04 running ActiveMQ, Mcollective, puppet agent and server *puppet-node1*: Ubuntu 12.04 running MCollective and puppet agent *puppet-node2*: Ubuntu 12.04 running MCollective and puppet agent *puppet-node3*: CentOS 6.3 running MCollective and puppet agent I installed the *mcollective-plugins-puppetd plugin* on all *3 Ubuntu

Package: xen-utils-4.17 Version: 4.17.1+2-gb773c48e36-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainers, On one of our domUs we discovered that the network interface names were wrongly assigned since recreating the domU after an upgrade to bookworm. If over 10 network interfaces are configured the mapping (dom0) vifX.10 <-> eth10 (domU) does not apply anymore. Instead the interfaces on dom0 are

Op 18-10-2023 om 11:32 schreef Ingo Asche via samba: > Hi Michael, > > thanks for the info - and your work... > > As Bookworm for Raspberry isn't that far away, I can live with that. > This is "just" my playground... I have recently migrated my Raspberry Pi machines from Raspbian to Debian bookworm. It has several advantages: - All Debian packages are

On 20/07/2023 15:02, Kothe Patrik via samba wrote: > What version of Samba are the DCs running and on what OS ? > --> They're still running on 4.13.17 and Debian 10 since that's the pre-packed version we started with and didn't dare to upgrade so far. > Was anything updated on any of the machines ? If so, what ? > --> No. We had our monthly