Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Member join to Active Directory -> DNS-Update fails"
2024 May 28
1
Security Implications of "ldap server require strong auth"?
Am 27.05.2024 17:46, schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> On Mon, 27 May 2024 17:27:30 +0200
> Bestattungen Vitt - Thomas Reitelbach via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Am 27.05.2024 16:25, schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
>> > On Mon, 27 May 2024 15:57:52 +0200
>> > Bestattungen Vitt - Thomas Reitelbach via samba
>> > <samba at
2024 May 28
1
Security Implications of "ldap server require strong auth"?
Am 28.05.2024 07:51, schrieb Christian Naumer via samba:
> Am 28.05.24 um 07:34 schrieb Bestattungen Vitt - Thomas Reitelbach via
> samba:
>>
>> Christian Naumer said, I can get Nextcloud to work without this
>> insecure parameter - I'll have to figure out how I could acceppt a
>> self-signed certificate on the side of apache2/php-ldap module.
>
> I
2024 May 27
2
Security Implications of "ldap server require strong auth"?
Am 27.05.2024 16:25, schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> On Mon, 27 May 2024 15:57:52 +0200
> Bestattungen Vitt - Thomas Reitelbach via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Samba Team,
>>
>> I hope someone with more expertise than me can englighten me to the
>> following "problem":
>>
>> I'm on my way to
2024 May 27
2
Security Implications of "ldap server require strong auth"?
Hello Samba Team,
I hope someone with more expertise than me can englighten me to the
following "problem":
I'm on my way to implement Nextcloud LDAP Authentication against my
existing Samba Active Directory via the LDAP Auth Plugin in Nextcloud. I
have had trouble with the configuration of the Auth-Plugin in Nextcloud
because it could not bind to the ldap directory.
After some
2024 May 27
1
Security Implications of "ldap server require strong auth"?
On Mon, 27 May 2024 17:27:30 +0200
Bestattungen Vitt - Thomas Reitelbach via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
wrote:
> Am 27.05.2024 16:25, schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> > On Mon, 27 May 2024 15:57:52 +0200
> > Bestattungen Vitt - Thomas Reitelbach via samba
> > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Samba Team,
> >>
>
2024 May 28
1
Security Implications of "ldap server require strong auth"?
Am 28.05.24 um 07:34 schrieb Bestattungen Vitt - Thomas Reitelbach via
samba:
>
> Christian Naumer said, I can get Nextcloud to work without this insecure
> parameter - I'll have to figure out how I could acceppt a self-signed
> certificate on the side of apache2/php-ldap module.
I checked our installation and found this in the Nextcloud Doku
2024 May 28
1
Security Implications of "ldap server require strong auth"?
Hello Thomas,
we've done the exact same thing: we have a few nextcloud instances bound
to Samba (now 4.20, but 4.19 worked too).
You HAVE to use "ldaps://<FQDN>" in the "Host" field and "636" in the
"Port" field.
For the certificates issues: either you create a CA, create the samba
certificates and add this CA to the trusted certificate
2024 May 27
1
Security Implications of "ldap server require strong auth"?
On Mon, 27 May 2024 15:57:52 +0200
Bestattungen Vitt - Thomas Reitelbach via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
wrote:
> Hello Samba Team,
>
> I hope someone with more expertise than me can englighten me to the
> following "problem":
>
> I'm on my way to implement Nextcloud LDAP Authentication against my
> existing Samba Active Directory via the LDAP
2024 May 28
1
Security Implications of "ldap server require strong auth"?
Hi,
there is a suitable HowTo on how to create your own CA at:
https://checkmk.com/de/blog/how-become-your-own-certificate-authority
So long
Thom
Am 28.05.24 um 09:20 schrieb Matthias K?hne | Ellerhold
Aktiengesellschaft via samba:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> we've done the exact same thing: we have a few nextcloud instances bound
> to Samba (now 4.20, but 4.19 worked too).
>
2023 Aug 10
1
Samba domain time sync woes (Debian Bookworm)
FWIW, I looked at the settings in our domain (all of which I did myself).
I used to explicitly set up ntp time sources in our network for all windows
workstations before, and I continued to provide these after conversion from
nt4-style domain to samba AD-DC. The NTP records are provided by DHCP, and
are configured in the GPO, both with regional differences (choosing the local
NTP servers within
2023 Oct 25
1
DC Time Problems
> On 10/25/2023 9:53 AM PDT Ham via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>
> It appears that none of our windows clients are syncing their time with
> the samba DC.??? From what I can tell they are not able to get a
> response from the DC.? For example, where the DC is named athena:
>
> >w32tm /monitor /computers:athena
>
>
2023 Aug 08
2
Samba domain time sync woes (Debian Bookworm)
Hi folks,
I have been spending the better part of the day, trying to get time
synchronization to a Samba AD DC (Debian Bookworm 12.1) to work. Debian
Bookworm has recently replaced ntp with ntpsec, and time synchronization
stopped working.
I have logged the behavior, and Windows 10 clients first send a Windows
2000! compatible request, and ntpsec chokes on it, and does not respond.
The
2023 Oct 25
3
DC Time Problems
It appears that none of our windows clients are syncing their time with
the samba DC.??? From what I can tell they are not able to get a
response from the DC.? For example, where the DC is named athena:
>w32tm /monitor /computers:athena
athena[10.10.1.10:123]
? ICMP: 0ms delay
? NTP: error ERROR_TIMEOUT - no response from server in 1000ms
From a Linux machine there is
2023 Apr 30
1
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>
>
> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
>>>> Hi Yvan,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the information, really useful.
2023 Apr 30
1
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote:
>
> On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
2023 Apr 30
1
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
>
>
> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
>>> Hi Yvan,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I
>>> need to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then
2023 Apr 30
3
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
On 30/04/2023 10:52, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
>
>
> On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote:
>>
>> On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
2023 Oct 25
1
DC Time Problems
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
James Browning via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> > On 10/25/2023 9:53 AM PDT Ham via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > It appears that none of our windows clients are syncing their time
> > with the samba DC.??? From what I can tell they are not able to get
> > a
2023 Apr 30
1
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
On 30-04-2023 12:04, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>
>
> On 30/04/2023 10:52, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote:
>>>
>>> On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
2023 Apr 30
1
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>
>
> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
>> Hi Yvan,
>>
>> Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I
>> need to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then
>> getting the newest Samba packages from Bookworm backports. It's just
>> a