Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Crosscompilation support status?"
2017 Aug 18
0
Install locks up my server
This is still broken in the 2.2.32 release candidate. config.guess forks
copies till the server dies. Running Centos 6.6 under OpenVZ.
On 06/26/17 16:03, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>
> On 06/26/17 14:42, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 26 Jun 2017, at 23.19, Marc Perkel <marc at perkel.com> wrote:
>>> Ever since 2.26 I haven't been able to upgrade. In fact the install
2017 Aug 25
0
Install still locks up my server
This is still broken in the 2.2.32. config.guess forks copies till the
server dies. Running Centos 6.6 under OpenVZ.
On 06/26/17 16:03, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>
> On 06/26/17 14:42, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On 26 Jun 2017, at 23.19, Marc Perkel <marc at perkel.com> wrote:
>>> Ever since 2.26 I haven't been able to upgrade. In fact the install
>>> locks up
2017 Jun 26
2
Install locks up my server
On 06/26/17 14:42, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 26 Jun 2017, at 23.19, Marc Perkel <marc at perkel.com> wrote:
>> Ever since 2.26 I haven't been able to upgrade. In fact the install locks up my server.
>>
>> I get into and infinite recursive loop where the config-guess program calls itself until the server locks up from overload.
>>
>> I'm running Centos
2013 Aug 05
2
[LLVMdev] Many PPC64 failures with llvm 3.3
Hi,
I am building llvm 3.3 with cmake on PPC64 and have a bunch of regression
test failures. With only PPC backend enabled the list of failures is:
[ 1553s] Failing Tests (20):
[ 1553s] LLVM :: CodeGen/PowerPC/2007-05-22-tailmerge-3.ll
[ 1553s] LLVM :: CodeGen/PowerPC/2007-09-08-unaligned.ll
[ 1553s] LLVM :: CodeGen/PowerPC/2008-07-24-PPC64-CCBug.ll
[ 1553s] LLVM ::
2014 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] Lots of regtest failures on PPC64/Linux
missing-abstract-variable is a recent one I introduced - looking into it.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 2:39 AM, İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote:
> Hi Hal,
>
> These tests failures go away when I disable static libs aka
> -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF , with that only 2 regtest failures are left:
>
>
> [ 1314s] FAILED: cd /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/stage2/test
2013 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] [3.4 branch] SystemZ regressions
Hi,
Using openSUSE 13.1 on s390x machine I get two new regressions with llvm
3.4rc1:
[ 1412s]
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/unittests/ADT/BitVectorTest.cpp:39: Failure
[ 1412s] Value of: Vec.count()
[ 1412s] Actual: 1
[ 1412s] Expected: 5U
[ 1412s] Which is: 5
[ 1412s]
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/unittests/ADT/BitVectorTest.cpp:42: Failure
[ 1412s] Value of: Vec.all()
[ 1412s]
2013 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] [3.4 branch] SystemZ regressions
İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> writes:
> Using openSUSE 13.1 on s390x machine I get two new regressions with llvm
> 3.4rc1:
Hmm, I don't see this locally. Just to rule out one possibility,
which compiler are you using to build? Do you see the same thing
with a -O0 build?
Thanks,
Richard
> [ 1412s]
>
2013 Aug 29
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] cmake: BugpointPasses depends on intrinsics_gen
Fixes:
[ 0%] In file included from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h:30:0,
from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/include/llvm/InstVisitor.h:16,
from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/tools/bugpoint-passes/TestPasses.cpp:19:
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Intrinsics.h:41:34: fatal error: llvm/IR/Intrinsics.gen: No
2013 Aug 29
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] cmake: BugpointPasses depends on intrinsics_gen
Johannes Obermayr <johannesobermayr at gmx.de> writes:
> Fixes:
> [ 0%] In file included from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h:30:0,
> from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/include/llvm/InstVisitor.h:16,
> from /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/tools/bugpoint-passes/TestPasses.cpp:19:
>
2012 Apr 17
2
[LLVMdev] compiler_rt fails to build in release_31 branch
Hi;
This is on Linux/x86-64, I get this at stage1:
make[2]: Entering directory
`/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/stage1/projects/compiler_rt'
Makefile:6: make/config.mk: No such file or directory
Makefile:7: make/util.mk: No such file or directory
Makefile:16: *** Refusing to build with empty ProjObjRoot variable. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory
2019 Mar 20
2
build problem with 4.10.0
Hi
I want to build samba-4.10.0 for SUSE openLeap 15.1. Config and make
works fine but make install sucks:
./configure --prefix=/usr --localstatedir=/var --sysconfdir=/etc
--libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/lib64
--with-cachedir=/var/lib/samba --with-lockdir=/var/lib/samba/lock
--with-logfilebase=/var/log/samba --with-modulesdir=/usr/lib64/samba
--disable-rpath --disable-rpath-install
2012 Apr 24
0
[LLVMdev] compiler_rt fails to build in release_31 branch
ping? Still fails on 3.1 branch.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 5:35 PM, İsmail Dönmez <ismail at namtrac.org> wrote:
>
> Hi;
>
> This is on Linux/x86-64, I get this at stage1:
>
> make[2]: Entering directory `/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/stage1/projects/compiler_rt'
> Makefile:6: make/config.mk: No such file or directory
> Makefile:7: make/util.mk: No such file or
2011 Apr 08
3
[LLVMdev] dragonegg build failure
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 08:28:27AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> > The new dragonegg 2.9 sources fail to build against either FSF gcc 4.5.2 or 4.5.3svn
> > (with the i386_static.diff patch applied) on x86_64-apple-darwin10. In both cases, the
> > build fails as...
>
> what does the command
> ./TargetInfo -p
> return (the TargetInfo program
2014 Mar 18
2
[LLVMdev] Problems building host tools when cross compiling LLVM
Hi All,
I recently ran into an issue that was posted several years back on LLVMdev [1].
A brief recap of the problem is that when cross-compiling LLVM itself the
configure/make scripts get confused when creating the needed build host tools.
For example, building and configuring like:
CC_FOR_BUILD='i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc' CXX_FOR_BUILD='i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++'
2013 Nov 19
2
[LLVMdev] [3.4 branch] PPC64 regressions
Hi,
Its that time of the year again. Here is the results on openSUSE 13.1
PPC64.
Total of 3 failures which seems to be due the same problem (the value in
brackets is the time counter from the build system):
[ 3468s]
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/ppc32-vacopy.ll:21:10:
error: expected string not found in input
[ 3468s] ; CHECK: lwz [[REG3:[0-9]+]], {{.*}}
[ 3468s]
2013 Nov 19
0
[LLVMdev] [3.4 branch] PPC64 regressions
İsmai,
Thanks for testing these. Can you please file a bug report (and CC me on it), and attach the full output of these failing tests? (When the test fails you should see the full command -- rerun it without piping the output into FileCheck).
Thanks again,
Hal
----- Original Message -----
> From: "İsmail Dönmez" <ismail at donmez.ws>
> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing
2013 Nov 05
3
Building libvirt for ARM tizen.
Hi there!
I'm building libvirt-1.1.4 on Tizen. I had to modify the spec file:
1. Comment out requirements: xhtml1, scrub, shadow-utils
2. Added defines:
%define _without_selinux 1
%define _without_hal 1
%define _without_libnl 1
%define _without_macvtap 1
%define _without_storage_fs 1
%define _without_network 1
%define _without_sasl 1
%define _without_qemu 1
%define
2005 Jan 04
0
[PATCH] BUG on error handlings in Ext3 under I/O failure condition
Hello.
I found bugs on error handlings in the functions arround the ext3 file
system, which cause inadequate completions of synchronous write I/O operations
when disk I/O failures occur. Both 2.4 and 2.6 have this problem.
I carried out following experiment:
1. Mount a ext3 file system on a SCSI disk with ordered mode.
2. Open a file on the file system with O_SYNC|O_RDWR|O_TRUNC|O_CREAT
2011 Apr 08
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg build failure
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:37:39AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 08:28:27AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> > Hi Jack,
> >
> > > The new dragonegg 2.9 sources fail to build against either FSF gcc 4.5.2 or 4.5.3svn
> > > (with the i386_static.diff patch applied) on x86_64-apple-darwin10. In both cases, the
> > > build fails as...
2016 Jan 16
2
Building SVN head with CMake - shared libraries?
Hi again,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Ismail Donmez <ismail at i10z.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote:
>> I’m kinda scared that you’re using it. What are you trying to accomplish
>> that you are using it? Generally having LLVM split among that many
>> dynamically loaded libraries results