similar to: Miscalculation in a comment in dsl_dataset.h

2. update ZFS in libfsimage from illumos for pygrub diff -r 7c12aaa128e3 -r c2e11847cac0 tools/libfsimage/Rules.mk --- a/tools/libfsimage/Rules.mk Thu Oct 24 22:46:20 2013 +0100 +++ b/tools/libfsimage/Rules.mk Sat Oct 26 20:03:06 2013 +0400 @@ -2,11 +2,19 @@ include $(XEN_ROOT)/tools/Rules.mk CFLAGS += -Wno-unknown-pragmas -I$(XEN_ROOT)/tools/libfsimage/common/

I submitted the problem report to clang's bugzilla but no one seems to care so I have to send it to the mailing list. clang 3.7 svn (trunk 229055 as the time I was to report this problem) generates slower code than 3.5 (Apple LLVM version 6.0 (clang-600.0.56) (based on LLVM 3.5svn)) for the following code. It is a "8 queens puzzle" solver written as an educational example. As

The regressions in the performance of generated code, introduced by the llvm 3.6 release, don't seem to be limited to this 8 queens puzzle" solver test case. See... http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=llvm-clang-3.5-3.6-rc1&num=1 where a bit hit in the performance of the Sparse Matrix Multiply test of the SciMark v2.0 benchmark was observed as well as others.

Using the SciMark 2.0 code from http://math.nist.gov/scimark2/scimark2_1c.zip compiled with the same... make CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native" I am able to reproduce the 22% performance regression in the run time of the Sparse matmult benchmark. For 10 runs of the scimark2 benechmark, I get 998.439+/-0.4828 with the release llvm clang 3.5.1 compiler and 1217.363+/-1.1004 for the current

In another thread recursive snapshot creation was found atomic so that it is done quickly, and more important, all at once or nothing at all. Do you know if recursive destroying and renaming of snapshots are atomic too? Regards Henrik Heino

Recently LLD made it to the front page of HN (yay!): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13670458 This comment about the Solaris linker surprised me: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13672364 """ > To me, the biggest advantage is cross compiling Not all system linkers have this problem. For example, Solaris ld(1) is perfectly capable of cross-linking any valid ELF file.

Hello zfs-code, http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/vdev_cache.c 72 * All i/os smaller than zfs_vdev_cache_max will be turned into 73 * 1<<zfs_vdev_cache_bshift byte reads by the vdev_cache (aka software 74 * track buffer). At most zfs_vdev_cache_size bytes will be kept in each 75 * vdev''s vdev_cache. While it

Hello. On 01/07/2015 11:55 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > commit 8b38694a2dc8b18374310df50174f1e4376d6824 > vhost/net: virtio 1.0 byte swap > had this chunk: > - heads[headcount - 1].len += datalen; > + heads[headcount - 1].len = cpu_to_vhost32(vq, len - datalen); > This adds datalen with the wrong sign, causing guest panics. > Fixes:

Hello. On 01/07/2015 11:55 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > commit 8b38694a2dc8b18374310df50174f1e4376d6824 > vhost/net: virtio 1.0 byte swap > had this chunk: > - heads[headcount - 1].len += datalen; > + heads[headcount - 1].len = cpu_to_vhost32(vq, len - datalen); > This adds datalen with the wrong sign, causing guest panics. > Fixes:

On Sat, 29 May 2004 12:00:52 -0700 (PDT), <freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org> wrote: Hello ! Today i see in snort logs : [**] [1:528:4] BAD-TRAFFIC loopback traffic [**] [Classification: Potentially Bad Traffic] [Priority: 2] 06/07-09:44:39.044590 127.0.0.1:80 -> 10.6.148.173:1566 TCP TTL:128 TOS:0x0 ID:577 IpLen:20 DgmLen:40 ***A*R** Seq: 0x0 Ack: 0x75830001 Win: 0x0 TcpLen:

commit 8b38694a2dc8b18374310df50174f1e4376d6824 vhost/net: virtio 1.0 byte swap had this chunk: - heads[headcount - 1].len += datalen; + heads[headcount - 1].len = cpu_to_vhost32(vq, len - datalen); This adds datalen with the wrong sign, causing guest panics. Fixes: 8b38694a2dc8b18374310df50174f1e4376d6824 Reported-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson at redhat.com>

commit 8b38694a2dc8b18374310df50174f1e4376d6824 vhost/net: virtio 1.0 byte swap had this chunk: - heads[headcount - 1].len += datalen; + heads[headcount - 1].len = cpu_to_vhost32(vq, len - datalen); This adds datalen with the wrong sign, causing guest panics. Fixes: 8b38694a2dc8b18374310df50174f1e4376d6824 Reported-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson at redhat.com>

Hello Tim and others, Thanks for your help explaining this process on IRC. I wrote out a first draft in the RFC xml format. I have attached the xml (labeled as xml.txt so it will appear inline) and the rendered txt files. Please let me know where I can make improvements. I will upload this draft to the IETF datatracker and send it out to codec@ after addressing your comments. -------------- next

Hi, I''ve migrated my tc configuration from CBQ to HTB. One problem appeared. Htb seems to miscalculate the bandwidth for classes with greater rates. For rates below 2Mbit there is almost no difference between the configured and the measured rate. For large ones the problem starts. My root class has 10Mbit rate and when the interface has heavy trafic the measured bandwidth

Hello all, I am not sure my original mail got through to the list (I haven''t received it back), so I attach it below. Anyhow, now I have a saved kernel crash dump of the system panicking when it tries to - I believe - deferred-release the corrupted deduped blocks which are no longer referenced by the userdata/blockpointer tree. As I previously wrote in my thread on unfixeable

zfs get all claims that i have 523G used by snapshot. i want to get rid of it. but when i look at the space used by each snapshot i can''t find the one that can occupy so much space daten/backups used 959G - daten/backups

Triple Release Day! James Wan, from the Solaris Quality Engineering group, has released the Megacli test suite. More information on Megacli test suite can be found at: http://opensolaris.org/os/community/storage/tests/ http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/test/ontest-stc2/src/suites/storage/megacli/README http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/test/ontest-stc2/src/suites/storage/megacli/

Here is my thought process on why the application crashes with a protection violation reading a section of memory. I used IDA to disassemble the app. Here's the section where it reads from memory and crashes because of a protection violation: 00760D4A sub_760D4A proc near ; CODE XREF: sub_75FCB0+159^Xp 00760D4A push ebp 00760D4B mov

Hi All, I am looking at trying to understand the conceptual model of how data is grouped and partitioned within a storge pool. In looking at the on disk document that Tabriz sent out a few weeks ago I see that object sets are the grouping which ZFS uses to group objects that are related. Specifially to aid in format and layout of like objects in to a set. So, for example 1 potential object

Hello Jean-Marc, Thanks for the quick reply and comments. On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Here's some more minor comments below. As long as you address the two > comments from my previous email (254 -> 2 and the draft name), the draft > is good for submitting as initial version on the IETF website (even