similar to: Error in samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck

That's not a problem its just a ACL provisioning message as you can see the result was "DAG:DAD:PAI" but expected was "O:DAG:DAD:PAR" that's "normal" ;-) just ignore it or do a "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset" Am 19.10.23 um 17:27 schrieb bd730c5053df9efb via samba: > Hi! > > I executed the command "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck"

On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 13:01:53 +0000 Peter Mittermayer via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > While resuming my testing for adding a new DC with higher Samba > version I have some questions: > > 1. do I have to expunge tombstones on each DC or just one (and > replication will remove it from others). - I think it should be run > on all DCs. > > 2. same question

Hey, dir exisit.... root at dc01:/autofs/backup# ls -la /autofs/backup/linux/samba_dom/backup.tgz/ insgesamt 12484 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 20. Nov 14:02 . drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 20. Nov 14:00 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12765535 20. Nov 14:03 samba-backup-samba.laurenz.ws-2023-11-20T14-02-51.306281.tar.bz2 drwx------ 2 root root 4096 20. Nov 14:00 tmpdz6serc_ drwx------ 7 root

While resuming my testing for adding a new DC with higher Samba version I have some questions: 1. do I have to expunge tombstones on each DC or just one (and replication will remove it from others). - I think it should be run on all DCs. 2. same question for dbcheck 3. Rowland mentioned that the error message I get when trying the DC is just a result of the real issue. In which section of the

Full output: root at iob-master:~# samba-tool domain backup online --server=dc01 --targetdir=/autofs/backup/linux/samba_dom/$(hostname -d) -U administrator Password for [SAMBA\administrator]: INFO 2023-11-20 15:30:05,639 pid:73781 /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/samba/join.py #1614: workgroup is SAMBA INFO 2023-11-20 15:30:05,640 pid:73781 /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/samba/join.py #1617: realm

I see. Thanks for clarification. Checking the detailed of using debuglevel 10 I see this message: ../../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c:5583: Resolving conflict record via existing-record rename 'CN=Vikas Rajan,CN=Users,DC=SUB,DC=DOM,DC=TLDbg' -> 'CN=Vikas Rajan\0ACNF:de5b7fa1-e3ec-4631-a8d7-cdfc137ac3b7,CN=Users,DC=SUB,DC=DOM,DC=TLD' Although it was renamed

System config:- bash-3.2# ifconfig -a lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 rge0: flags=201004843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4,CoS> mtu 1500 index 2 inet 192.168.1.53 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether 0:1e:8c:25:cc:a5 lo0:

Hi, I'm trying to upgrade my very old samba domain controllers (4.11) to latest samba. (4.21). The process I'm following is to demote on of the existing DCs and repalce it with a news system (up-to-date OS & samba version). Unfortunately when trying to join as DC I get below error: INFO 2024-12-05 19:29:42,222 pid:126140 /usr/local/samba/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/samba/join.py

On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 15:34:19 +0100 Dirk Laurenz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Full output: > > root at iob-master:~# samba-tool domain backup online --server=dc01 > --targetdir=/autofs/backup/linux/samba_dom/$(hostname -d) -U > administrator Password for [SAMBA\administrator]: > INFO 2023-11-20 15:30:05,639 pid:73781 >

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 08:02:59PM +0200, Yonatan Shtarkman wrote: > The attached code snippet?reproduces the issue when running: > python3 libugestfs_segfault_repro.py > > With: > guestfs version: 1.48.6 > guestfs-python version: 1.48.6 Can confirm with {python3-,}libguestfs-1.51.1-1.fc39.x86_64 The stack trace is roughly the same as yours. Rich. > Stacktrace: > #0

Unable to connect to my HVM # xm list Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 3869 2 r----- 368.6 vm00 45 128 1 -b---- 62.3 The vm00 changes state from "r" to "b" after about a minute. (I have a fedora dvd in the drive.) #cat

Dear samba experts, I did a classic upgrade from a Samba 3.6.14 samba NT4 DC to a Samba 4.18.2 AD-DC. It does not work and I just want to make sure that I have the correct understanding of our domain SID. On our old Samba server net getdomainsid shows: SID for local machine SERV00 is: S-1-5-21-1415314133-2460755331-2761616138 SID for domain NAV is: S-1-5-21-1415314133-2460755331-2761616138

On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 03:31:08PM +0200, Yonatan Shtarkman wrote: > Hey, > When downloading a file whose path contains multi-byte utf-8, libguestfs > sometimes crashes. > This reproduces when using python, and not when using guestfish. > > Code to reproduce: > for i in range(2000): > ? ? g.download ('/xxx?', '/tmp/1') 'i' is not used inside the

Hai, ? im running samba 4.2.2 sernet on debian. ? when i run : samba-tool gpo aclcheck -UAdministrator ? im getting : ERROR: Invalid GPO ACL O:DAG:DAD:PAI(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;EA)(A;OICIIO;0x001f01ff;;;CO)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;DA)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;AU)(A;OICI;0x001200a9;;;ED) and it tells me it should be O:DAG:DAD:P?

Dear All, I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO are having issue Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate success fully. When I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck or samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset But don't seem to got it fix.. Any suggestion? Thank in advance. #samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck Processing section

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 3:31 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > OK, if you look at the end of the permissions, there is a '+' sign, this > shows that extended acls set, to see these: > > getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol The difference in acls is that the non-working domain includes: user:3000001:r-x user:3000002:rwx user:3000003:r-x

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 4:24 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Yes, that is what it is designed for. Yes, and yes it does! Thank you!!

G'day Guys, We are running Centos 6.4, samba4.0.10, compiled from tgz. Has anyone come up with this one before? samba-tool gpo aclcheck ERROR(<type 'exceptions.KeyError'>): uncaught exception - 'No such element' File "/usr/local/samba/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run return self.run(*args, **kwargs) File

Am 2017-05-23 um 20:16 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> Can I reset that somehow manually? > > If you are adding GPOs, then yes, by never running sysvolreset. I only did that after sysvolcheck failed! And I still get these problems in the GPO-management. I translate via googling: "A processing error occurred collecting data using this base domain controller." this one ?

Samba 4.4.2 I was doing some maintenance work and I noticed that sysvolcheck gave some error. I ran "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset". Running sysvolcheck again still gives errors. I tried with several sysvol backups and the result is always the same. The affected policies are always "Default Domain Policy" and "Default Domain Controllers Policy". These policies