similar to: Question about silos and Authentication policies

Hello, You cannot use Active Directory Administrativ Center because samba has no ADWS implented. There where efforts and but ADWS did no reach production status. I think Catalyst, Andrew Bartlett tried someting, did not finish it. Yes you need to use the old RSAT. Gretings Daniel EDV Daniel M?ller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von:

Do you know wich of the RSAT I need to use to manage auth-policies and silos. With samba-tool I can't assign users and hosts to the policies. I can only create, delete, list and view policies and silos Am 19.10.23 um 09:03 schrieb Daniel M?ller via samba: > Hello, > > You cannot use Active Directory Administrativ Center because samba has no ADWS implented. > There where

I looked around a little bit, but as far as I can see, at the moment it's not possible to use auth-policies and silos with Samba-DCs only. So I need at least one Windows DC :-( Am 19.10.23 um 11:48 schrieb Stefan Kania via samba: > Do you know wich of the RSAT I need to use to manage auth-policies and > silos. With samba-tool I can't assign users and hosts to the policies. I

Talking to myself again ;-) Samba-tool is working a little bit different then the silo/policy management on a Windows-DC. On a Windows-DC after assigning the user and host to the silo you have to assign the silo to the user and the host. When assigning the user and host to the silo with samba-tool, the assignment to the user and the host will be done at the same time. So now my policy looks

Hi Stefan, We had a long weekend in New Zealand, I'm catching up now to your emails. Some of the slight differences between Windows tools I've already picked up on and are in my PR Andrew Bartlett mentioned on Friday, but I'm always open to learning what things are missing or different etc. On 23/10/23 02:58, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > Talking to myself again ;-) > >

Thanks Rob for chiming in. Stefan, I do want to be very clear, one of the big challanges that we as developers face building these kind of tools is that we don't run AD domains day-to-day. So we really value good feedback on the ergonomics. If you can test with our work in progress, we are keen to adapt the tooling where possible to be more in line with what is 'naturally expected, so

I was playing around again with Windows and when you add members to silos, or remove them, it should not set/unset assigned silo on the user. So I've got a new pull request in Draft state still where I remove that functionality, as well as add some new commands to samba-tool user command. It turned out to be easier to add sub commands to user, as edit user wasn't quite what I thought

Am 27.10.23 um 02:32 schrieb Rob van der Linde via samba: > The missing functionality is --silo and --policy on modify user, and > probably also create user commands. That's exacly right, that's also the way Windows is handling this.

Trying to learn Puppet, given a cfengine background. Am trying to understand the Puppet way of accomplishing the following: I have a lot of servers, that are organized into clusters (we call them silos). Each silo has a specific set of parameters (like IP addresses). I''d like to organize the silo information in some way that each server is associated with that information, and can

On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 12:18 +0100, Pisch Tam?s wrote: > > Others have integrated Azure AD with Samba without the FL increase, > > and > > the key step would be the adprep work, > > Then I will do it without increasing the FL. What do I have to do > with adprep? To (prepare to) raise the domain functional level of an existing domain, after updating the smb.conf and

My housemate has formalized a sortof new attack against unix-style operating systems. He''s a BSD fan, so that''s where he developed the attack. He asked me to check Linux, which I did. It seems Linux is not vulnerable to it. This attack is going out to BUGTRAQ tonight. The attack isn''t too serious because it requires physical access to the console, but it

Just wanted to note that you also need "mount" => 2.11 to use "auto" in fstab. On the homepage http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ it only tells you to use "util-linux" => 2.11 Also, a note about SILO not working with unclean Ext3 would be nice (i.e. make a dedicated ext2 /boot partition if you want to run ext3 on Sparc). /Martin (very new to this list)

Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.19.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.19 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.19.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.19 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of Samba 4.20.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.20 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of Samba 4.20.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.20 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of Samba 4.19.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.19 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the second release candidate of Samba 4.19.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.19 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.19.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.19 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES

Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.19.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.19 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= NEW FEATURES/CHANGES