similar to: Low performance when using "server signing" = "mandatory"

On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:13:49 +0200 Adam B?aszczykowski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > I'm experiencing very slow read/write performance, about 20 MB/s, on > Samba share when I configure the "server signing" option as > "mandatory". Once I set "server signing" to "default", the read/write > performance returns

Hi, If I update the Samba server version to the latest one, set the "server signing = default" parameter and the "server role = standalone" parameter, will my server be vulnerable to CVE-2016-2114? Thank you. pon., 16 pa? 2023 o 16:50 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> napisa?(a): > On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:13:49 +0200 > Adam B?aszczykowski via

Hello, I have updated my system to Debian 12 with Samba 4.17.12, but the problem with performance still exist. On the Samba page there is a note in the CVE-2016-2114 description: "Note that the default for server roles other than active directory domain controller, is "off" because of performance reasons." https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2016-2114.html Does it mean

On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:54:47 +0200 Adam B?aszczykowski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > I have updated my system to Debian 12 with Samba 4.17.12, but the > problem with performance still exist. > On the Samba page there is a note in the CVE-2016-2114 description: > "Note that the default for server roles other than active directory > domain

On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:02:20 +0200 Adam B?aszczykowski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Ok thank you. > So, Is my file server with Samba 4.17.12 vulnerable to CVE-2016-2114 > if it is not a DC server? > > To be clear, I don't use any Active Directory domain controller in my > network. Lets see if I can paraphrase the documentation for CVE-2016-2014

Ok thank you. So, Is my file server with Samba 4.17.12 vulnerable to CVE-2016-2114 if it is not a DC server? To be clear, I don't use any Active Directory domain controller in my network. Best regards. Adam Blaszczykowski pon., 23 pa? 2023 o 10:20 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> napisa?(a): > On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:54:47 +0200 > Adam B?aszczykowski via samba

Hello, We have strange issue with rsync and backup-dir option. In case of having empty directories and deleting them, those directories are not backed up in backup-dir directory. Directories are backed up only if contains files. Scenario: # mkdir -p source/b # rsync -a --backup --backup-dir=../backup source/ destination/ # rm -rf source/b # rsync -a --backup --backup-dir=../backup source/

On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 08:38:09 +0200 Adam Błaszczykowski <adam.blaszczykowski at gmail.com> wrote: > ok sorry for that, now should be ok :-D > > *smb.conf:* > [global] > workgroup = RES > netbios name = dsshp2 > vfs objects = acl_xattr shadow_copy2 fileid > fileid:mapping = fsid > encrypt passwords = yes > domain logons = no > log

Hello, I have problem with Samba 4.4.3. I'd like to use SMB 3.02 file shares as shared storage for Hyper-V in Windows Server 2012 R2. I am able to create Virtual Machine on Samba share using guest access, but when I try to start VM I'm getting the following error: "An error occurred while attempting to start the selected virtual machine(s). 'New Virtual Machine' could not

On 08/05/2016 03:50 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 08:38:09 +0200 > Adam Błaszczykowski <adam.blaszczykowski at gmail.com> wrote: > >> ok sorry for that, now should be ok :-D >> >> *smb.conf:* >> [global] >> workgroup = RES >> netbios name = dsshp2 >> vfs objects = acl_xattr shadow_copy2 fileid >>

Hi, I wonder about the performance of a Linux box used as router (I guest I''m not the first :). Althought I know it mainly depends on the hardware, I''m trying to find some references on the topic or comparations with other routing solutions (FreeBSD box used as router, Cisco, etc). For example, http://facweb.cti.depaul.edu/jyu/Publications/Yu-Linux-TSM2004.pdf (althought is

Hi guys, I was wondering whether there's anyone who could share his/her experiences with using Microsoft RTC Library. In particular I am wondering what Ethernet capacity should I have in scenario of 30 people using Microsoft RTC Library for SIP communication (PBX is obviously Asterisk :-) ) concurrently (alaw codec being used)? What problems can be expected in such scenario? Would a good 1

Hello listmates, As some of you may know we have been having a really bad problem with Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 cards. See here for details: http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?24,140124,140224 So now my question is, what PCI 1 Gbit/s Ethernet adapters should I use under CentOS? If you have had a consistent positive experience with any particular chipset/brand please speak up.

While attempting to use cifs to mount a win2k3 share, I get this error: [root@dhcp190 root]# mount //win2k3/data -t cifs -o username=administrator /mnt/smbfs cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it. 2687: protocol negotiation failed SMB connection failed Where exactly do I enable smb signing? kernel 2.6.5 + samba 3.0.3

Hi! I'm trying to connect to a share on a Windows 2003 server with samba 3.0.0. I have edited smb.conf as was instructed in chapter 7 of the Samba-HOWTO-Collection to include the following: client use spnego = yes When I try to connect to the server, I get the following error: cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it 2355: protocol negotiation failed SMB connection

Hi, I was trying smbmount (SuSE's samba-client-3.0.20b-3.4). The mount command replied: cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it. 9451: protocol negotiation failed SMB connection failed No I'd suggest to change the message at least: It's unclear who "we" is: The Samba Team, the client, or the server The server is a "Windows 2003 server",

I have not tried with a Samba 4.x DC. As far as I know Samba 4.x does not have this limitation. On 01/06/15 04:10, ali-reza.fahimi at schneider-electric.com wrote: > > Does this mean that we cannot use mandatory server signing in Samba 3? > What about the later versions? The problem is that lack of server > signing is considered a security hole. > > > Inactive hide

We are using samba on RedHat 8.8. The latest samba version available for RHEL8 is samba 4.17.5 Since samba is updated to 4.17.5 from 4.16.4 the "server signing = mandatory" config option seems to be broken. Nessus scans reports a vulnerability on server signing not required: SMB Signing not required VULNERABILITY MEDIUM PLUGIN ID57608 Description Signing is not required on the remote

I have encountered this error: cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it. 26595: protocol negotiation failed SMB connection failed when I am attempting to mount a windows xp machine from a linux machine: mount -t smbfs //machine/share /root/smb_mnt -o username=administrator,password=mypass I have looked through the archives and found the following information concerning this

Hello listmates, We are working on setting up two private networks linked by a public network which is fast (1 Gbit/s) but potentially insecure. Since the hosts on our two networks need to talk to each other, and do so securely, we have decided to use OpenVPN to connect them, making one gateway a server and the other a client. The connectivity part was easy to establish and worked like a charm.