similar to: ON 20060327 and upcoming solaris 10 U2 / coreutils

Hello zfs-discuss, Just to be sure - if I create ZFS filesystems on snv_39 and then later I would want just to import that pool on S10U2 - can I safely assume it will just work (I mean nothing new to on-disk format was added or changed in last few snv releases which is not going to be in u2)? I want to put right now (I have to do it now) some data on ZFS and later I want to

OK, I know that there''s been some discussion on this before, but I''m not sure that any specific advice came out of it. What would the advice be for supporting a largish number of users (10,000 say) on a system that supports ZFS? We currently use vxfs and assign a user quota, and backups are done via Legato Networker. >From what little I currently understand, the general

Hi, a simple question.. is add dataset not part of zonecfg ? global# zonecfg -z myzone (OK) zonecfg:myzone> add dataset (fails as there is no dataset option) zonecfg:myzone> add zfs (fails as there is no dataset option) Basically how do I add a dataset to a zone ? Thanks Roshan please cc me pererar at visa.com

Hi, I deployed ZFS on our mailserver recently, hoping for eternal peace after running on UFS and moving files witch each TB added. It is mailserver - it''s mdirs are on ZFS pool: capacity operations bandwidth pool used avail read write read write ------------------------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Working to get ZFS to run on a minimal Solaris 10 U2 configuration. In this scenario, ZFS is included the miniroot which is booted into RAM. When trying to share one of the filesystems, an assertion is raised - see below. If the version of source on OpenSolaris.org matches Solaris 10 U2, then it looks like it''s associated with a popen of /usr/sbin/share. Can anyone shed any

As mentioned last night, we''ve been reviewing a proposal for hot spare support in ZFS. Below you can find a current draft of the proposed interfaces. This has not yet been submitted for ARC review, but comments are welcome. Note that this does not include any enhanced FMA diagnosis to determine when a device is "faulted". This will come in a follow-on project, of which some

Hi, I have simple installation, using mostly defaults, of two mirrored servers. One brick, one volume. GlusterFS version is 3.12.1 (server and client). All hosts involved are Debian 9.1. On another host I have mounted two different directories from the cluster using /etc/fstab: gfs1,gfs2:/vol1/sites-available/ws0 /etc/nginx/sites-available glusterfs defaults,_netdev 0 0 and

Summary: If you use ZFS, do not downgrade from build 35 or later to build 34 or earlier. This putback (into Solaris Nevada build 35) introduced a backwards- compatable change to the ZFS on-disk format. Old pools will be seamlessly accessed by the new code; you do not need to do anything special. However, do *not* downgrade from build 35 or later to build 34 or earlier. If you do so, some of

On Solaris x86, does zpool (or anything) support PATA (or SATA) IDE SMART data? With the Predictive Self Healing feature, I assumed that Solaris would have at least some SMART support, but what I''ve googled so far has been discouraging. http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2006/10/29/solaris-needs-smart-support-please-help/ Bug ID: 4665068 SMART support in IDE driver

As I wrote earlier, MSVC 2015 U2 incorrectly compiles stream_encoder_intrin_*.c files for x86-64 platform. As a result, flac works, but compression ratio is close to 1. This patch disables some compiler optimizations, and compression ratio reverts back to normal values. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: msvc_bug.patch Type: application/octet-stream

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> As I wrote earlier, MSVC 2015 U2 incorrectly compiles >> stream_encoder_intrin_*.c files for x86-64 platform. >> As a result, flac works, but compression ratio is close to 1. >> This patch disables some compiler optimizations, and >> compression ratio reverts back to normal values. > > Rather than having the same chunk of code in

Author: dm89450 Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: fe0bf8e57ac4df0265e4c3d932b3183d06de3f88 Log message: 6217588 New Keyboards software needed for S11 and S10 U2 Files: create: usr/src/cmd/loadkeys/type_6/albania create: usr/src/cmd/loadkeys/type_6/belarus create: usr/src/cmd/loadkeys/type_6/bulgaria create: usr/src/cmd/loadkeys/type_6/croatia create:

Hi, I am trying to run wIntergate by IBM (Now U2) which is a gloried telnet terminal for connecting to mv database server. The installation worked fine. The problem is with execution of wInteg.exe. It starts fine but after some time throws error "An Unexpected license error 0x40000000 has occur" after which it hangs. On investigating in Windows environment. I see that it's also

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Ok, I'll take the original patch as it is. DO you have a link to a > bug report on this problem? It would be nice to put it in a comment > above the workaround. :sigh: I hoped that somebody else will find what's wrong and will create a bugreport... Well, here is the link:

Hello, I have a number centos3.8 installations. Recently I have figured out that version of coreutils is : [ivan at algol ivan]$ rpm -q coreutils coreutils-4.5.3-28.1 while RedHat has released an bux fix errata to that package: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2006-0670.html Actually I discovered that when I encounter bug that should be fixed by this update:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0858 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0858.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: e612f1b61dabaa9bfeef283faa700134d623fef7f9c081f48b51ae7f5d020376 coreutils-8.4-19.el6_4.2.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0287 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0287.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: c501f02c5f96d2697122aa0751ee2f65e35b426758e4a1e1362113a69d65850a coreutils-8.4-31.el6_5.1.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0787 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0787.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: f07fba723dfa5ecd3c374ec7c0edeaaf5853134252f090507745925a25f2de4e coreutils-8.4-31.el6_5.2.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:2017 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2017.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: b95b1e17710cbc00ffa843ab14131b27b3014b124170b04c913282d888cc4ea0 coreutils-8.4-37.el6_7.3.i686.rpm

G'day... I've installed the acl - xatrrib patch from bestbits and it works nice on my RH9 system with Samba.. the only problem i encounter is that a file or directory losses it's extended atrributes when you copy it.. for example cp "--preserve=all /source /destination" preserves the normal acl af the linux system, but skips the acl/xattrib from bestbits. i used the