similar to: mount volumes ON the arbiter?

On 8/25/2017 12:56 AM, Gionatan Danti wrote: > > >> WK wrote: >> 2 node plus Arbiter. You NEED the arbiter or a third node. Do NOT try 2 >> node with a VM > > This is true even if I manage locking at application level (via > virlock or sanlock)? We ran Rep2 for years on 3.4.? It does work if you are really,really? careful,? But in a crash on one side, you might

Il 25-08-2017 21:48 WK ha scritto: > On 8/25/2017 12:56 AM, Gionatan Danti wrote: > > > We ran Rep2 for years on 3.4.? It does work if you are really,really? > careful,? But in a crash on one side, you might have lost some bits > that were on the fly. The VM would then try to heal. > Without sharding, big VMs take a while because the WHOLE VM file has > to be copied over.

On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 11:15:32AM +0000, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > is possible to add an arbiter node on the client? I've been running in that configuration for a couple months now with no problems. I have 6 data + 3 arbiter bricks hosting VM disk images and all three of my arbiter bricks are on one of the kvm hosts. > Can I use multiple arbiter for the same volume ? In example,

That really isnt an arbiter issue or for that matter a Gluster issue. We have seen that with vanilla NAS servers that had some issue or another. Arbiter simply makes it less likely to be an issue than replica 2 but in turn arbiter is less 'safe' than replica 3. However, in regards to Gluster and RO behaviour The default timeout for most OS versions is 30 seconds and the Gluster

Hi, The existing syntax in the gluster CLI for creating arbiter volumes is `gluster volume create <volname> replica 3 arbiter 1 <list of bricks>` . It means (or at least intended to mean) that out of the 3 bricks, 1 brick is the arbiter. There has been some feedback while implementing arbiter support in glusterd2 for glusterfs-4.0 that we should change this to `replica 2 arbiter

Right now you have 3 "sets" of replica 2 on 2 hosts.In your case you don't need so much space for arbiters (10-15GB with 95 maxpct is enough for each "set") and you need a 3rd system or when the node that holds the data brick + arbiter brick fails (2 node scenario) - that "set" will be unavailable. If you do have a 3rd host, I think the command would be:gluster

Hi, We're running a cluster with two data nodes and one arbiter, and have sharding enabled. We had an issue a while back where one of the server's crashed, we got the server back up and running and ensured that all healing entries cleared, and also increased the server spec (CPU/Mem) as this seemed to be the potential cause. Since then however, we've seen some strange behaviour,

Ok. I have a 3rd host with Debian 12 installed and Gluster v11. The name of the host is arbiter! I already add this host into the pool: arbiter:~# gluster pool list UUID Hostname State 0cbbfc27-3876-400a-ac1d-2d73e72a4bfd gluster1.home.local Connected 99ed1f1e-7169-4da8-b630-a712a5b71ccd gluster2 Connected

Hi Strahil, We're using gluster to act as a share for an application to temporarily process and store files, before they're then archived off over night. The issue we're seeing isn't with the inodes running out of space, but the actual disk space on the arb server running low. This is the df -h? output for the bricks on the arb server: /dev/sdd1 15G 12G 3.3G 79%

Hi, Thanks for your response, please find the xfs_info for each brick on the arbiter below: root at uk3-prod-gfs-arb-01:~# xfs_info /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1 meta-data=/dev/sdc1 isize=512 agcount=31, agsize=131007 blks = sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1 = crc=1 finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=0 =

But if I change replica 2 arbiter 1 to replica 3 arbiter 1 gluster volume add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 I got thir error: volume add-brick: failed: Multiple bricks of a replicate volume are present on the same server. This setup is not optimal. Bricks should be on different nodes to have best fault tolerant configuration. Use

Hi, you mentioned that the arbiter bricks run out of inodes.Are you using XFS ?Can you provide the xfs_info of each brick ? Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov? On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 19:41, Liam Smith<liam.smith at ek.co> wrote: Hi, We're running a cluster with two data nodes and one arbiter, and have sharding enabled. We had an issue a while back where one of the server's

Thanks for the clarification. That behaviour is quite weird as arbiter bricks should hold?only metadata. What does the following show on host?uk3-prod-gfs-arb-01: du -h -x -d 1?/data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brickdu -h -x -d 1?/data/glusterfs/gv1/brick3/brickdu -h -x -d 1 /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick2/brick If indeed the shards are taking space -?that is a really strange situation.From which version

Hi Liam, I saw that your XFS uses ?imaxpct=25? which for an arbiter brick is a little bit low. If you have free space on the bricks, increase the maxpct to a bigger value, like:xfs_growfs -m 80 /path/to/brickThat will set 80% of the Filesystem for inodes, which you can verify with df -i /brick/path (compare before and after).?This way?you won?t run out of inodes in the future. Of course, always

So I went ahead and do the force (is with you!) gluster volume add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 volume add-brick: failed: Multiple bricks of a replicate volume are present on the same server. This setup is not optimal. Bricks should be on different nodes to have best fault tolerant co nfiguration. Use 'force' at the end of the command

Hi Strahil, This is the output from the commands: root at uk3-prod-gfs-arb-01:~# du -h -x -d 1 /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick 2.2G /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/.glusterfs 24M /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/scalelite-recordings 16K /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/mytute 18M /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/.shard 0

What's the volume structure right now? Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 18:24, Gilberto Ferreira<gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: So I went ahead and do the force (is with you!) gluster volume add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 volume add-brick: failed: Multiple bricks of a replicate volume are present

After force the add-brick gluster volume add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 force volume add-brick: success pve01:~# gluster volume info Volume Name: VMS Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: e1a4f787-3f62-441e-a7ce-c0ae6b111ebf Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 3 x (2 + 1) = 9 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1:

is possible to add an arbiter node on the client? Let's assume a gluster storage made with 2 storage server. This is prone to split-brains. An arbiter node can be added, but can I put the arbiter on one of the client ? Can I use multiple arbiter for the same volume ? In example, one arbiter on each client.

Hi, On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:35 AM, WK <wkmail at bneit.com> wrote: > Pavel. > > Is there a difference between native client (fuse) and libgfapi in regards > to the crashing/read-only behaviour? I switched to FUSE now and the VM crashed (read-only remount) immediately after one node started rebooting. I tried to mount.glusterfs same volume on different server (not VM), running