similar to: New features in Solaris Express 05/06

Hello zfs-discuss, Just to be sure - if I create ZFS filesystems on snv_39 and then later I would want just to import that pool on S10U2 - can I safely assume it will just work (I mean nothing new to on-disk format was added or changed in last few snv releases which is not going to be in u2)? I want to put right now (I have to do it now) some data on ZFS and later I want to

Now that Solaris 10 11/06 is available, I wanted to post the complete list of ZFS features and bug fixes that were included in that release. I''m also including the necessary patches for anyone wanting to get all the ZFS features and fixes via patches (NOTE: later patch revision may already be available): Solaris 10 Update 3 (11/06) Patches sparc Patches * 118833-36 SunOS 5.10:

Hi all. A quick question about the checksum error detection routines in ZFS. Surely ZFS can decide about checksum errors in a redundant environment but what about an non-redundant one? We connected a single RAID5 array to a v440 as a NFS server and while doing backups and the like we see the "zpool status -v" checksum error counters increment once in a while. Nevertheless the

I was wondering if somebody could explain why I get different results here: >treats[,2]<-as.factor(treats[,2]) >treats[,5]<-as.factor(treats[,5]) >treats[,4]<-as.factor(treats[,4]) #there are 'c' on more days than I have 'h2o2', where treats[,4] is the day. I only want 'c' that correspond to the same days that I have a 'h2o2' also.

So I have this dual 16-core Opteron Dell R715 with 128G of RAM attached to a SuperMicro disk enclosure with 45 2TB Toshiba SAS drives (via two LSI 9200 controllers and MPxIO) running OpenIndiana 151a4 and I''m occasionally seeing a storm of xcalls on one of the 32 VCPUs (>100000 xcalls a second). The machine is pretty much idle, only receiving a bunch of multicast video streams and

Hi all, I am going to have solaris 06/06, a database (postgresql), application server (tomcat or sun app. server) on x86, 2GB with max. 3 scsi (hardware raid possible) disks. There will be no e-mail or file serving. The ratio of write/read operations to database is >=2 (and there is no other significant disk io). Block size of postgresql is default (I think it is 8K). Our application

A long formula which is converted using as.character, looses its last part: ``diagonal = 1e-12)'' Shorter formula is ok though. Best, H??vard ************ Browse[2]> formula.str y ~ -1 + b1 + b2 + b3 + b4 + b5 + b6 + b7 + b8 + b9 + b10 + b11 + b12 + b13 + b14 + b15 + b16 + b17 + b18 + b19 + b20 + b21 + b22 + b23 + b24 + b25 + b26 + b27 + b28 + b29 + b30 + b31 + b32 +

Hi, I do not really have much direct control over the compile lines any more. I guess I could code up a wrapper for your wrapper so that the libtool wrapper would be happy, but could you all consider libtool built projects and embed the necessary option stripping in your clang-cc thing? Thank you. Regards, Bruce make[2]: Entering directory `/home/bkorb/ag/ag/snprintfv' /bin/sh ../libtool

Dear all, I would appreciate please a piece of help regarding the use of acast/dcast functions in reshape2 package. Specifically, I'm working with a data frame, that has information about SAMPLE, GENE, and TYPE of MUTATION (as shown below): Sample Gene Type 22M AEBP1 SNV 17M AEBP1 SNV 22M ATR INDEL 22M ATR SNV 11M BTK SNV 11M BTK

Today I attempted to upgrade to S10_U2 and migrate some mirrored UFS SVM partitions to ZFS. I used Live Upgrade to migrate from U1 to U2 and that went without a hitch on my SunBlade 2000. And the initial conversion of one side of the UFS mirrors to a ZFS pool and subsequent data migration went fine. However, when I attempted to attach the second side mirrors as a mirror of the ZFS pool, all

I''ve recently upgraded my x4500 to Nevada build 97, and am having problems with the iscsi target. Background: this box is used to serve NFS underlying a VMware ESX environment (zfs filesystem-type datasets) and presents iSCSI targets (zfs zvol datasets) for a Windows host and to act as zoneroots for Solaris 10 hosts. For optimal random-read performance, I''ve configured a single

Hi gurus, I like zpool iostat and I like system monitoring, so I setup a script within sma to let me get the zpool iostat figures through snmp. The problem is that as zpool iostat is only run once for each snmp query, it always reports a static set of figures, like so: root at exodus:snmp # zpool iostat -v capacity operations bandwidth pool used avail read

Recently, I''m benchmarking all kinds of stuff on my systems. And one question I can''t intelligently answer is what blocksize I should use in these tests. I assume there is something which monitors present disk activity, that I could run on my production servers, to give me some statistics of the block sizes that the users are actually performing on the production server.

[retrying send with different email source] Hi, I do not really have much direct control over the compile lines any more. I guess I could code up a wrapper for your wrapper so that the libtool wrapper would be happy, but could you all consider libtool built projects and embed the necessary option stripping in your clang-cc thing? Thank you. Regards, Bruce make[2]: Entering directory

Greetings, all. Does anyone have a good whitepaper or three on how ZFS uses memory and swap? I did some Googling, but found nothing that was useful. The reason I ask is that we have a small issue with some of our DBA''s. We have a server with 16GB of memory, and they are looking at moving over databases to it from a smaller system. The catch is that they are moving to 10g. Oracle

With llc, the size of the names section can vary widely depending on the value of -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD. Enabling coverage shouldn't increase the name section size much. I only see one place where this happens, and it's relatively cold: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/llvm/coverage/Users/buildslave/jenkins/sharedspace/clang-stage2-coverage-R at

Original Dom0 setup had been done per Todd Deshane''s instruction:- http://deshantm.livejournal.com/29959.html Functionality of SNV89 PV and HVM DomUs tested fine as well as F8 and WinXP HVM guests. Once again, all done as advised at http://deshantm.livejournal.com/29959.html Next i attempted to follow :- https://help.ubuntu.com/8.04/serverguide/C/libvirt.html #

Hi There is a problem when creating a domU. I intend to install Solaris N90 on RedHat RHEL5 in paravirtualized(I''ve tried fully virtualized method, that''s no problem). #xm info release : 2.6.18-53.el5xen machine : i686 xen_caps : xen-3.0-x86_32p My steps are as follow(install via NFS): 1 mkdir disk and mkdir Solaris 2 mount /dev/cdrom /disk/Solaris, it tell me that disk

Hi I want t create a demU. but I it require me the NFS location. #virt-install -n xvm1 --paravirt -r 1024 --nographics -f /export/home/xvm1 -s 16 -l /net/t1000-up/software/snv-solarisdvd-x86-77.iso but during installing, it need NFS server. But I set NFS location /net/t1000-up/software/snv-solarisdvd-x86-77.iso. ERROR: You must specify a host who know what''s wrong? If I install demU

We''re running a Cyrus IMAP server on a T2000 under Solaris 10 with about 1 TB of mailboxes on ZFS filesystems. Recently, when under load, we''ve had incidents where IMAP operations became very slow. The general symptoms are that the number of imapd, pop3d, and lmtpd processes increases, the CPU load average increases, but the ZFS I/O bandwidth decreases. At the same time, ZFS