Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "On-write Automatic Snapshot"
2005 Jan 24
15
[Bug 125] add BSM audit support
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125
alex.bell at bt.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |alex.bell at bt.com
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the
2009 Oct 22
0
[LLVMdev] request for help writing a register allocator
Hi Susan,
> But this doesn't seem to be happening; the stores to memory are there but
> the loads are not.
>
> Any ideas what's going wrong?
Are you using VirtRegMap::addSpillPoint and VirtRegMap::addRestorePoint ? If
not you may need to add calls to them to let the rewriter know where to
insert the loads/stores.
> If not, any advice on how to generate the loads
2009 Oct 22
4
[LLVMdev] request for help writing a register allocator
I found the problem! My generated code is spilling correctly but is not
reloading at all. For example, if the original code has the equivalent of
this (where %1024 is a virtual reg):
%1024 = xxx
...
yyy = %1024
and I find no physical register for %1024, then I assign it to physical
register %edi and to a stackslot. That creates code like this:
%edi = xxx
store from %edi to the
2006 Aug 07
4
ZFS/UFS/TMPFS and extended attributes inconsistent behaviour
As part of looking into a minor issue with the group listed when using
runat(1) on a UFS filesystem for Johannes (my Google Summer of Code
student work on new basic file privs), I discovered an even bigger issue
with UFS and extended attributes.
I''ve cc''d ZFS discuss because I used ZFS as the comparison and I believe
that ZFS is acting correctly but even then it might not be
2002 Dec 10
2
OpenSSH 3.5p1 and BSM for Solaris
Can someone help me get BSM working with Solaris 8 and OpenSSH 3.5p1?
I saw the patch here for OpenSSH 3.4p1, but do not know how to apply it to OpenSSH 3.4p1 nor do I feel comfortable modifying to work with OpenSSH 3.5p1:
openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
Is this patch needed to fix the BSM crontab issue only, or is it required for BSM auditing in general?
Jeff
2014 Dec 04
3
Adding Solaris Audit to sshd (and sftp-server)
Hi Damien,
I'm working with the Solaris team that is integrating openssh
into upcoming Solaris releases. I'm looking for advice from the
upstream community. You were suggested for that advice. If
there are other mailing lists you'd like me to ask, I'm happy
to do so, or if you'd like to forward, please feel free to do so.
The --with-audit=bsm (audit-bsm.c) configuration
2003 Jan 03
1
OpenSSH, Solaris 8, and BSM works with BSM patch, but must disable privilege separation
To get BSM working on Solaris 8 with OpenSSH, I did this:
Download John R. Jackson's OpenSSH 3.5p1 BSM patch here, and save as "patch.tar.gz":
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125
(NOTE TO OpenSSH DEVELOPERS, can you incorporate this patch into the next version of OpenSSH?)
Installing the OpenSSH 3.5p1 BSM patch:
?--------------------------------------
Turning on Sun BSM
2011 Mar 08
3
This is supposed to predict a time series?!
Hello,
I just ran the predict.StructTS function using the AirPassengers data
and got a ridiculous result. Here's what I ended up with:
http://24.210.155.111/PredictWhat!.pdf
Who wrote this? Am I seriously supposed to think this function would
accurately predict a time series?
-AnalogKid
2004 Dec 20
6
[Bug 125] add BSM audit support
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125
dtucker at zip.com.au changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #647 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2004-12-20 16:24 -------
2005 Jan 26
1
OpenSSH and BSM
All,
I've recently received a requirement to implement OpenSSH on a Solaris
server with BSM enabled. Checking through the list archive suggests that
the patch Darren's patch is almost ready but requires testing & perhaps
fine-tuning.
Can someone please let me know what the status is and if any assistance
is required with testing I'm happy to offer an extra pair of hands.
Thanks
2006 Sep 30
1
audit-bsm.c lacks <errno.h>
#include <errno.h> was removed from includes.h in July:
----------------------------
revision 1.113
date: 2006/07/12 12:22:46; author: dtucker; state: Exp; lines: +1 -2
- stevesk at cvs.openbsd.org 2006/07/11 20:07:25
[scp.c auth.c monitor.c serverloop.c sftp-server.c sshpty.c readpass.c
sshd.c monitor_wrap.c monitor_fdpass.c ssh-agent.c ttymodes.c atomicio.c
includes.h
2009 Dec 13
4
any use of flash causing "stack level too deep"
Is there any way to clear what''s in there?
This happens any time flash[] is in my code. It can be setting or
reading a value.
I''ve tried commenting out all uses of flash in my code to get a few
different pages to load, thinking this would clear the values, but no
luck.
If I get into the debugger, a p flash or pp flash will give a ''Stack
level too deep'' error
2007 Jun 02
1
Problem with the command "StrucTS" that fits a basic structural model for time series
Hi everybody,
I'am very interested with the basic structural model of time series. So I used the command "StructTS" but I failed to obtain a desirable output, in fact when I write in R Console the following lines:
> x=(1,2,3,4,5,2,25,14,12,13,11,6,9,24,12,13,14,12,12,14,11,12,14,15,20,21,22,23,21,25,28)
>(fit <- StructTS(x,type = "BSM"))
I obtained the following
2004 Dec 13
1
Status of Sun BSM/Auditd Support ?
Hey folks,
About a year ago it was pointed out to me there was BSM support in CVS that
would hopefully make it into a release soon. I had a look over it and it looks
like it covers everything (it certainly covers more than the 3 or 4 things we
do here at USC).
So I'm wondering what the status of that is? Is it planned for a release soon?
Are there issues with it? This is a really big feature
2007 Jul 26
1
Asterisk 1.2.23 and Sangoma a102 no incoming calldetected
Do you have any extension in default context of your extensions.conf
file to accept incoming calls ?
It must be something like;
exten => 12345678,1,Answer()
exten => 12345678,2,Playback(Welcome)
...
12345678 = The DID number you are calling to reach E1
Idris
-----Original Message-----
From: Erick Perez [mailto:eaperezh at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 7:03 AM
To:
2001 Nov 12
4
Openssh 3.0p1/Solaris 8 problems still...
Currently under solaris 8 with a fairly generic build:
CC="cc" ./configure \
--prefix=/opt/openssh \
--sysconfdir=/var/ssh \
--with-rsh=/usr/local/etc/rsh \
--with-ipv4-default \
--with-ssl-dir=/usr/local/ssl \
--with-ipaddr-display \
--with-pam \
--with-pid-dir=/var/ssh
cron will quit working since ssh hasn't
2002 Jul 14
3
[Bug 125] with BSM auditing, cron editing thru ssh session causes cron jobs to fail
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125
------- Additional Comments From jrj at purdue.edu 2002-07-14 13:31 -------
Created an attachment (id=131)
Update of bug #2 patch to 3.4p1
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
2005 Mar 03
2
Question/concern about bsm auditing option on solaris
Hello,
I downloaded and compiled the Mar 2, 2005 snapshot and compiled it with
bsm auditing for solaris turned on. I've been noticing about a dozen or
so of the following messages per day now. Not sure exactly what it is, or
if it is a big issue.
Mar 3 13:46:10 machine_name sshd[15298]: [ID 800047 auth.crit] fatal: mm_request_send: write
If it matters it is running on solaris 8
2002 Dec 13
3
Suggestion: Disable PrivilegeSepartion by default
PrivilegeSeparation seems to be a valuable option, however at its
current maturity level it is the cause of several problems. Just to name
a few:
- Incompatible with BSM auditing on Solaris
- Incompatible with PAM password aging (for this reason??? the code to
handle password expiration has been disabled without ANY notice)
- Causes core dumps on HP-UX
I think PrivilegeSeparation should be
2002 Apr 11
3
[Bug 2] sshd should have BSM auditing on Solaris
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2
Michael.Gerdts at alcatel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |Michael.Gerdts at alcatel.com
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are