Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "Adding PTR records"
2023 Jul 21
1
Adding SRV records to zone
I'm asking that what is the proper method to add SRV records. I read the documentation but I couldn't find anything around it.
If you can perhaps add something which specifies how each and every type of record is to be written on documentation, that would be very useful.
Thanking you
Sagar Acharya
https://humaaraartha.in
21 Jul 2023, 18:46 by jeroen at nlnetlabs.nl:
> Hi Sagar,
2023 Jul 21
1
Adding SRV records to zone
Hi Sagar,
Are you getting a particular error?
Because the same method should work just fine in NSD. Simply open the
corresponding zone file (as configured in nsd.conf) and put that line
in there.
Best regards,
Jeroen Koekkoek
On Fri, 2023-07-21 at 09:14 +0200, Sagar Acharya via nsd-users wrote:
> How do I add SRV record to my zone file?
>
> Eg. In pdns I have
>
>
2023 Jul 21
1
Adding SRV records to zone
How do I add SRV record to my zone file?
Eg. In pdns I have
_xmpp-client._tcp.example.com.? ?3600? ? ?IN? ? ?SRV? ? ? 0 5 5222 example.com
Thanking you
Sagar Acharya
https://humaaraartha.in
P.S. Please cc me, I'm not subscribed to this list.?
2024 Mar 01
1
RFC8501 IPv6 Wildcard PTR
Per RFC 8501 seciont 2.2
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8501
I have attempted to use a wildcard on a /64 boundary within a zonefile
for NSD, but it doesn't not appear to work. PTR lookups fail...
tested with, ie:
$ORIGIN 1.1.0.0.8.5.1.b.2.2.5.2.ip6.arpa.
* PTR my.fqdn.net.
Did not work...
or would you have to use? (not tested)
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.* PTR ....
--
2022 Dec 31
1
rewrite manpages to mdoc(7)
Dear authors of NSD,
currently, the manpages that come with NSD
are written in the traditional man(7) markup language.
I am proposing to rewrite them into the semantic markup
of the mdoc(7) language. I am willing to do the work.
See a version of nsd-checkzone.8 below as an example.
Both the man(7) and mdoc(7) languages have been around for decades,
and are supported by the prevalent formatters:
2024 Oct 08
1
SIGSEGV in rbtree_find_less_equal
Hi Chris,
I'm having trouble trying to reproduce the issue locally.
Like you I configure two zones.
zone:
name: example.com.
zonefile: example.com.zone.signed
zone:
name: bar.example.com.
zonefile: bar.example.com.zone
The file bar.example.com.zone does not exist. After touching and
reloading the signed zone, no segfault occurs. I've tried with and
without the
2024 Oct 08
1
SIGSEGV in rbtree_find_less_equal
Hi Jeroen,
Attached is the zone I used. Did you add the record for a.bar ?
Ex:
a.bar 300 IN NS ns.somewhere.net.
Chris
________________________________
From: Jeroen Koekkoek <jeroen at nlnetlabs.nl>
Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 5:33 AM
To: Chris LaVallee <clavallee at edg.io>; nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl>
Subject: Re:
2024 Oct 02
2
SIGSEGV in rbtree_find_less_equal
Hi,
I found a reproducible seg fault with a DNSSEC signed zone and overlapping config. I'm running NSD 4.10.1. Here's how to reproduce.
2 zones in nsd.conf:
zone:
name: "foo.com."
zonefile: "/zones/foo.com.zone.signed"
zone:
name: "bar.foo.com."
zonefile: "/zones/bar.foo.com.zone"
Zone files:
2024 Oct 09
1
SIGSEGV in rbtree_find_less_equal
Hi Chris,
I can reproduce with your zone. Thanks!
Best,
Jeroen
On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 14:07 +0000, Chris LaVallee wrote:
>
> Hi Jeroen,
>
>
> Attached is the zone I used. Did you add the record for a.bar ?
>
>
> Ex:
>
>
> a.bar ? 300 ? ? IN ?NS ? ? ?ns.somewhere.net.
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
2024 Oct 16
1
SIGSEGV in rbtree_find_less_equal
Hi Chris,
I've properly started looking into this yesterday. NSD definitely
shouldn't crash, still working on that.
However, the provided zone is invalid too(?) I'm not the foremost
expert on NSEC3 (or even DNSSEC), but is seems an NSEC3 is missing for
bar.foo.com. Empty non-terminals should still have an NSEC3 RR.
(Of course, the delegation point should be at bar.foo.com. too and
2015 Dec 03
2
After joining domain, Samba uses the workgroup name, not the FQDN when running the net ads command
On 03/12/15 20:54, Jonathan S. Fisher wrote:
> >unless you explicitly set your site name when you provision
> I guess we didn't. Is that an issue? I still wonder why that says
> "null" when, even if we used the default, our sitename is not null.
>
No it isn't an issue, why are you now worrying about something that has
nothing to do with your problem.
> >
2006 Dec 07
1
a few more notes
hi,
while all files is owned by nsd user and nsd run as nsd the nsd.db is
still owned by root user (because the compiler run as root and create
this file as root, ok i know just it'd be better if this file is owned
by nsd too).
another strange thing is that on the slave nsd i've got such messages:
-----------------------------------------
zonec: reading zone "lfarkas.org".
2015 Jul 03
3
NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION messages in log.samba--proper course of action?
Hi all,
We've recently migrated from a separate DNS server that was dynamically
updated with BIND's update-policy, using a manually generated
tkey-gssapi-keytab (plus a second server functioning as an ordinary
slave to the first), to BIND9_DLZ. The setup predated Samba's AD DC
support and BIND's DLZ support, and was originally established because
even though we needed AD, we were
2015 Dec 03
4
After joining domain, Samba uses the workgroup name, not the FQDN when running the net ads command
On 03/12/15 21:12, Jonathan S. Fisher wrote:
> Rowland, I hear and understand you loud and clear. If you could point
> out below what is the problem, because the client seems to be
> configured correctly as you have asked:
>
>
> root at freeradius:~# nslookup 192.168.127.131
> Server:192.168.127.131
> Address:192.168.127.131#53
>
> Non-authoritative answer:
>
2013 Oct 18
1
nsd-4.0.0b5(and rc2) and changing zone from master to slave ?
Hi,
I'm doing some quick tests with nsd-4.0.0b5 and (rc2). And found
something strange when changing (nsd-control reconfig) one
zone from:
zone:
name: 10.in-addr.arpa
zonefile: /zones/empty.zone
to
zone:
name: 10.in-addr.arpa
request-xfr: 192.168.122.12 NOKEY
allow-notify: 192.168.122.12 NOKEY
zonefile: /zones/slave/10.rev
and doing nsd-control reconfig.
After
2012 Jul 18
1
allow-notify SUBNET and request-xfr inconsistency
Hi list,
We are observing strange behavior of nsd v3.2.9 acting as slave DNS server.
The environment is set up as follows:
0. We are using 172.16.0.0/16 subnet;
1. Primary Master server at 172.16.100.114;
2. Slave server at 172.16.100.115. The config file is
in /etc/nsd-dns-slave.conf;
3. There may be also other Master servers im the given subnet.
Now I want to permit DNS NOTIFY messages to
2001 Jul 27
0
(fwd) Re: rsync and named-xfer
i'm posting this to the bind-users and rsync mailing lists in order to
get this archived for the next person who needs to do this :)
comments and suggestions are welcome, but please cc: to me because i'm
not subscribed to either list.
craig
----- Forwarded message from Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au> -----
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 10:30:20 +1000
From: Craig Sanders
2006 Dec 10
5
which is the vaild a format?
hi,
after i test nsd i find the following. if i use this in a zone file:
$ORIGIN example.com.
CNAME www
www CNAME x
x A 1.2.3.4
then it's excepted by nsd what's more give the proper result. if the
slave is nsd than there is no problem, while if the slave is bind i've
got the following error:
2023 Dec 05
1
Question on slave
On 04/12/2023 13:47, Jean-Christophe Boggio via nsd-users wrote:
Hi Jean-Christophe,
> When syncing between master and slaves, am I supposed to see new files
> appear in the slave's "zonesdir" directory? Because, as you might
> expect, I see nothing here. Is this behavior normal? From what I
> understand, the slave "caches" the data in /var/lib/nsd/nsd.db
2019 Dec 28
2
tinydns to nsd
On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 17:02:09 +0100
richard lucassen via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
> The problem is (was) that I used "include:" statements in nsd.conf
> to load zone information. Apparently nsd does not reread the include
> files upon a SIGHUP. I scripted everything into 1 file and a HUP
> rereads the zone info now.
Wrong, I made a mistake it