similar to: About "/usr/sbin/zfs" and ksh93/libshell.so ...

Roland Mainz wrote: > April Chin wrote: > > I''m in the process of filing manpage bugs for ksh93 to include > > changes to existing pages and new manpages for ksh93(1) and its > > builtins (builtin(1), disown(1)). > > > > CR 6457823 New manpages needed for ksh93 > > > > However, I do not see any manpages for vmap(1), alarm(1), or vpath(1). >

Hi, /bin/sh can be very different.... Ubuntu 22.04: :; ls -hal /bin/sh /bin/bash -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1,4M Jan 6 2022 /bin/bash lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Mar 23 2022 /bin/sh -> dash OpenIndiana (old OpenSolaris reincarnation) :; ls -hal /bin/sh /bin/bash -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1,4M Jan 25 09:42 /bin/bash lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Apr 6 2021 /bin/sh -> i86/ksh93 On

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:38:25AM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Fascinating. As I'd been in Sun OS, and started doing admin work when it > became Solaris, I'd missed that bit. A question: did the license agreement > include payment, or was it just restrictive on distribution? In 1990, when I started using ksh88, it was totally commercial. Binaries were $$$ and source was

Hi sh4 porters, I?ve just fixed a regression of klibc to build from source on sh4 using the sumotsu.debian.net porterbox (thanks for making one available) and found a problem with your archi- tecture: all binaries built with klibc (shared and static) get a SIGILL (illegal instruction). I suspect that different CFLAGS are needed. Please, someone, have a look at it; a release of klibc 2.0 upstream

I'm seeing a lot of noise in the logs, to the effect of: setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /bin/ksh93 from write access on the directory /var/lib/ssh-x509-auth as well as others related to find, cat, etc on .pem's in that directory. Is this a policy bug, or just no policy covering this? mark

Hi, folks, Our system gets/creates /var/lib/ssh-x509-auth/<username>,pem, then deletes it when the log out. selinux (in permissive mode) complains. First, I changed the context to cert_t, and *now* it complains that ksh93 wants write, etc access on the directory. grep ssh-x509-auth /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow offers me this: #============= sshd_t ============== allow sshd_t

Kees Cook dixit: >3) fix the use of trampolines in klibc AIUI done in klibc, but post-2.0.7 bye, //mirabilos -- FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much *much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I hadn't wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:15:27PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Stephen Harris <lists at spuddy.org> wrote: > > > Bash was bigger than ksh in the non-commercial Unix world because of ksh88 > > licensing problems. Back in 1998 I wanted to teach a ksh scripting > > course to my local LUG, but AT&T (David Korn himsef!) told me I couldn't > > give

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=826 Summary: RFE: scp and ssh should have an option to set the group- id at login time Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous

2013/2/12 Doug Lytle <support at drdos.info> > >> non-standard locations such as /usr/local/sbin > > If compiling from source, it'd normally be specified by the --prefix > option: > > ./configure --prefix=/usr/local > > Doug > > -- > Ben Franklin quote: > > "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary >

Commit-ID: 977ba2a397020ebf85605d76e385b9ab4bbd3e5f Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=977ba2a397020ebf85605d76e385b9ab4bbd3e5f Author: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> AuthorDate: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:18:35 +0800 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 02:57:21 +0000 [klibc] [BUILTIN] Set command

Commit-ID: 4ef2c091593e96e392384ca8142c64d5ba30b9c7 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=4ef2c091593e96e392384ca8142c64d5ba30b9c7 Author: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> AuthorDate: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:18:35 +0800 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:54 +0000 [klibc] dash: [BUILTIN] Set

Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Apr 27, 2015, at 4:38 AM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > > > This is the SVr4 Bourne Shell, so you need to take into account what has been > > added with Svr4: > > Is there any difference between your osh and the Heirloom Bourne Shell? > >

Stephen Harris wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:38:25AM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Fascinating. As I'd been in Sun OS, and started doing admin work when it >> became Solaris, I'd missed that bit. A question: did the license >> agreement include payment, or was it just restrictive on distribution? > > In 1990, when I started using ksh88, it was

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 01:04:29PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:39:24PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 07:51:48PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > In Debian testing the initrd triggers the warning. > > > > > > [ 34.529809] process '/usr/bin/fstype' started with executable stack > > > >

Hello, I've just seen the below exception in my log file.? does any one knows why ? Nov 17 00:37:55 MyHost abrt: detected unhandled Python exception in '/usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate' Nov 17 00:37:55 MyHost abrtd: New client connected Nov 17 00:37:55 MyHost abrt-server[6427]: Saved Python crash dump of pid 6424 to /var/spool/abrt/pyhook-2012-11-17-00:37:55-6424 Nov 17

Package: logcheck Version: 1.3.14 Severity: normal Tags: patch I keep getting these messages logged, when under high load. This patch should clean that up. commit 72661acccafa519fcb48a6a756e5c35d96e7511d Author: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn at axis.com> Date: Fri Jan 27 16:08:33 2012 +0100 Workaround for error: /usr/sbin/logcheck: line 100: kill: (31667)

I am tring to install wine-20040213-1fc1winehq.i386.rpm into fedora 1 on a celeron 500. When I install it it gives an error: /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/ is not a symbolic link It still installs something and when I try to run a windows app I get this error: err:virtual:map_image Standard load address for a Win32 program (0x00400000) not available - security-patched kernel ? wine: could not load

I have a large group of Linux servers that I inherited from a previous administrator. Unfortunately there is no single sign-on configured so each server has it's own local accounts with local authentication. Normally I use ssh keys and a handy shell script to change passwords on all these machines with the usermod -p command. We are able to update the password on on one server and push the

Every time I try and join a Vista system to the domain I get this error in the log: [2010/03/26 15:18:58, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(1191) april (192.168.1.194) couldn't find service public Error: modifications require authentication at /usr/sbin//smbldap_tools.pm line 1083. [2010/03/26 15:19:16, 0] passdb/pdb_interface.c:pdb_default_create_user(329) _samr_create_user: Running the