similar to: TextMate Sidebar

Hi I am experimenting with Constructor based dependency injection for rails controllers. So I have something like this class LoginSessionsController < ApplicationController def initialize(authenticator = TheRealAuthenticator) @authenticator = authenticator end .... end The plan was to override the authenticator used when testing with something like describe

Hey all, I just found Bryan Helmkamp''s (of webrat fame) slides on a presentation he did at GoRuCo 2008: http://www.brynary.com/2008/4/26/story-driven-development-slides-posted On slides 21-24 he talks about writing good stories and shows gives two examples.. the way not to do it and the way to do it. You can also see the video of the presentation at confreaks

So I''ve just started working on a rails project which currently has something like 7500 LOC. All of the tests are written in Test::Unit, although the test coverage is pretty poor: rcov says that 25% of the code is covered, while rake stats shows the code to test ratio as 1:0.1 (800 lines of test code). I guess I''m wondering what would generally be advisable here. Is it

I?m trying to spec a ?binary?, and as previously discussed on this list, I?m trying to do it ?from outside? ? i.e., by calling it with Kernel#` and observing the (side-)effects. Unfortunately, this doesn?t really let me spec expectations about its internals. Let?s assume I have a -d flag and I parse it with Trollop to set Conf.debug: opts = Trollop::options do opt :debug, ''Print debug

hi, i have discovered a bug under IE6 and the sidebar management of typo. you can see the html coda that show the error on http://www.shoob.com/denis/sidebar_typo/sidebar.html or download the code locally with http://www.shoob.com/denis/sidebar_typo.zip i''m not able to find what cause the error so i cannot propose a patch. The Error is on the onHover method line 698 or 687

hi, i have discovered a bug under IE6 and the sidebar management of typo. I have created a simplified version available under http://www.shoob.com/denis/sidebar_typo/sidebar.html The code is also available locally http://www.shoob.com/denis/sidebar_typo.zip Every thing run fine under fifireox, safari and opera. We only have an error under IE 6. i''m not able to find what cause the

I have a basic login form rendered as a component in the sidebar of my main layout view. Whether or not the login succeeds, the controller redirects to the main index to refresh the sidebar. On success, I set the session[:user_id] to @user.id as usual. The problem is that ''index'' gets rendered in the sidebar. However, when I comment out "session[:user_id] =

I have been tidying up bits of the Wiki. This one is not clear cut, so I decided to seek advice. Also, I wasn't sure where to post this question, so defaulted to ogg-dev. Should Speex and CMML be removed from the Wiki Sidebar at: https://wiki.xiph.org/MediaWiki:Sidebar ? Many thanks, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web:

On August 9, 2013, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Martin Leese wrote: ... >> Should Speex and CMML be removed from >> the Wiki Sidebar > Don't remove Speex - it's still very much in use. > > We probably want to add Daala to the list of video codecs: > https://wiki.xiph.org/Daala > > We probably want to remove CCML from the

Thanks Charles for the clarification. If NUT cannot control it then removing it would, IMO add value. On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 at 00:14, Charles Lepple < clepple_at_gmail.com_chribonn at duck.com> wrote: > On Mar 9, 2024, at 5:16?PM, chribonn at duck.com wrote: > > > > The posting at > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/432#issuecomment-405371395 > references

Very good point. I hope to write a beginners guide -- more like adopting my notes --on NUT. I could summarise your point that technically one should only override settings that NUT can act upon (like those settings that control Low Battery or, as stated in the documentation if the reported value is known to be incorrect. Overriding a variable that is out of scope for NUT (as with

Wow :-) I'll have a read through it. On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 at 15:54, Roger Price < roger_at_rogerprice.org_chribonn at duck.com> wrote: > On Sun, 10 Mar 2024, Alan via Nut-upsuser wrote: > > > Very good point. I hope to write a beginners guide -- more like > adopting my > > notes --on NUT. > > I did the same thing, 131 pages, at >

On Mar 9, 2024, at 5:16?PM, chribonn at duck.com wrote: > > The posting at https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/432#issuecomment-405371395 references ups.delay.start and suggests setting it to -1. > > upsrw -l pve1 at localhost listed this as modifiable but any attempt at modifying the value failed. I used the override.ups.delay.start = -1 in nut.conf and this is now being

I''m working on a simple photo gallery app for personal use and I want to generalize the sidebar such that in any page (controller or view, I''m not sure which) I can dynamically add either 1. links to a given sidebar 2. or an entire sidebar. I know that typo does this, and I''ve looked the code. I think it''s too complex a solution for my simple site.

Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote > Linux does not implement stable kernel interfaces. It may be that there is > an intention to do so but I''ve seen problems on Linux resulting from > self-incompatibility on a regular base. To be precise, Linus tries hard to prevent ABI changes in the system call interfaces exported from the kernel, but the glibc team had defeated

I am currently using 2 layouts in my site. One is for the admin area. I am trying to get content in my sidebar to change depending upon the current controller. Example: Within admin I have a users controller and a articles controller. When in the users view I want the sidebar to display options (like add user delete user etc). What is the best actionview way to do this. I don''t

My leaky memory says we moved entry-point into some form of debug record in the standard libraries, circa Solaris 8/9. Before that, my group maintained text files that listed all the entry-points and their parameters for libraries like libc.so, so that we could print out parameter values in apptrace(8). There''s a (small) chance the records are complete enough that dtrace could use the

I''m using RSpec on Rails and would like to clean up the backtraces, so I went looking for an RSpec equivalent to ThoughtBot''s Quiet Backtrace gem<http://thoughtbot.com/projects/quietbacktrace>. I found Spec::Runner::QuietBacktraceTweaker in the RDOCS, but I can''t figure out how to use it. Can I add something to spec_helper.rb that will utilize

This is kind of a two part question. Question One: I want to be sure that an Order model is protecting sensitive attributes from mass assignment. The example looks like this: describe Order do it "should protect total attribute from mass assignment" do @order = Order.new(:total => 0.05) @order.total.should_not == 0.05 end end And the code to implement it: class Order

Now that RSpec is nearing 1 dot oh, are there any plans to implement an integration testing equivalent in RSpec On Rails?