similar to: raidz2 is alive!

I''ve seen the problems with bug 6343667, but I haven''t seen the problem I have at the the moment. I started a scrub of a b72 system that doesn''t have any recent snapshots (none since the last scrub) and the % complete is cycling: scrub: scrub in progress, 69.08% done, 0h13m to go scrub: scrub in progress, 46.63% done, 0h28m to go scrub: scrub in progress, 6.36%

Hello! I''am setup zfs / cifs home storage server, end now have low performance with play movie stored on this zfs from windows client. server hardware is not new , but n windows it perfomance was normal. CPU is AMD Athlon Burton Thunderbird 2500, runing on 1,7GHz, 1024 RAM and storage: usb c4t0d0 ST332062-0A-3.AA-298.09GB /pci at 0,0/pci1458,5004 at 2,2/cdrom at 1/disk at

I''ve installed Open Solaris 2009.06 on a machine with 5 identical 1TB wd green drives to create a ZFS nas. The intended install is one drive dedicated to the OS and the remaining 4 drives in a raidz1 configuration. The install is working fine, but creating the raidz1 pool and rebooting is causing the machine report "Cannot find active partition" upon reboot. Below is command

I''m not sure exactly what happened with my box here, but something caused a hiccup on multiple sata disks... May 9 16:40:33 sol scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /pci at 0,0/pci10de,5c at 9/pci-ide at a/ide at 0 (ata6): May 9 16:47:43 sol scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /pci at 0,0/pci-ide at 7/ide at 1 (ata3): May 9 16:47:43 sol timeout: abort request, target=0

Hey, I''m currently running on Nexenta alpha 6 and I have some corrupted data in a pool. The output from sudo zpool status -v data is: pool: data > state: ONLINE > status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data > corruption. Applications may be affected. > action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the > entire

i''ve got a little zpool with a naughty raidz vdev that won''t take a replacement that as far as i can tell should be adequate. a history: this could well be some bizarro edge case, as the pool doesn''t have the cleanest lineage. initial creation happened on NexentaCP inside vmware in linux. i had given the virtual machine raw device access to 4 500gb drives and 1 ~200gb

As mentioned last night, we''ve been reviewing a proposal for hot spare support in ZFS. Below you can find a current draft of the proposed interfaces. This has not yet been submitted for ARC review, but comments are welcome. Note that this does not include any enhanced FMA diagnosis to determine when a device is "faulted". This will come in a follow-on project, of which some

Machine is running x86 snv_94 after recent upgrade from opensolaris 2008.05. ZFS and zpool reported no troubles except suggesting upgrade for from ver.10 to ver.11. seemed like a good idea at the time. system up for several days after that point then took down for some unrelated maintenance. now will not boot the opensol, drops to grub prompt, no menus. zfs was mirrored on two disks c6d0s0 and

Hey guys, I had a zfs system in raidz1 that was working until there was a power outage and now I''m getting this: pool: tank state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices are faulted in response to IO failures. action: Make sure the affected devices are connected, then run ''zpool clear''. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-HC scrub: scrub in progress for 0h49m,

I am converting a 4 disk raidz from osx to opensolaris. And I want to keep the data intact. I want zfs to get access to the full disk instead of a slice. I believe like c8d0 instead off c8d0s1. I wanted to do this 1 disk at a time and let it resilver. what is the proper way to do this. I tried, I believe from memory : zpool replace -f rpool c8d1s1 c8d1 but it didn''t let me do that. then I

One of my disks in the zfs raidz2 pool developed some mechanical faliure and had to be replaced. It is possible that I may have swaped the sata cables during the exchange, but this has never been a problem before in my previous tests. What concerns me is the output from zpool status for the c2d0 disk. The exchanged disk is now c3d0 but is no longer a part of the pool?! This is build_75 on x86

Hello the list, I thought that it should be easy to do a clone (not in the term of zfs) of a disk with zpool. This manipulation is strongly inspired by http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=135038 and http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/boot/ But unfortunately this doesn''t work, and we do have no clue what could be wrong on c1d0 you have a zfs root create a

I made a bad judgment and now my raidz pool is corrupted. I have a raidz pool running on Opensolaris b85. I wanted to try out freenas 0.7 and tried to add my pool to freenas. After adding the zfs disk, vdev and pool. I decided to back out and went back to opensolaris. Now my raidz pool will not mount and got the following errors. Hope someone expert can help me recover from this error.

Hi all, Please can you help with my ZFS troubles: I currently have 3 x 400 GB Seagate NL35''s and a 500 GB Samsung Spinpoint in a RAIDZ array that I wish to expand by systematically replacing each drive with a 750 GB Western Digital Caviar. After failing miserably, I''d like to start from scratch again if possible. When I last tried, the replace command hung for an age, network

Hi! I tried to add an other FiweFire Drive to my existing four devices but it turned out, that the OpenSolaris IEEE1394 support doen''t seem to be well-engineered. After not recognizing the new device and exporting and importing the existing zpool, I get this zpool status: pool: tank state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is missing or

Hi all, we have just bought a sun X2200M2 (4GB / 2 opteron 2214 / 2 disks 250GB SATA2, solaris 10 update 4) and a sun STK 2540 FC array (8 disks SAS 146 GB, 1 raid controller). The server is attached to the array with a single 4 Gb Fibre Channel link. I want to make a mirror using ZFS with this array. I have created 2 volumes on the array in RAID0 (stripe of 128 KB) presented to the host

Hi Host: VirtualBox 2.1.0 (WinXP SP3) Guest: OSol 5.11snv_101b IDE Primary Master: 10 GB, rpool IDE Primary Slave: 10 GB, empty format output: AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c3d0 <DEFAULT cyl 1302 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci0,0/pci-ide at 1,1/ide at 0/cmdk at 0,0 1. c3d1 <drive unknown> /pci0,0/pci-ide at 1,1/ide at 0/cmdk at 1,0 # ls

My setup: A SuperMicro 24-drive chassis with Intel dual-processor motherboard, three LSI SAS3081E controllers, and 24 SATA 2TB hard drives, divided into three pools with each pool a single eight-disk RAID-Z2. (Boot is an SSD connected to motherboard SATA.) This morning I got a cheerful email from my monitoring script: "Zchecker has discovered a problem on bigdawg." The full output is

Using build 70, I followed the zfsboot instructions at http:// www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/boot/zfsboot-manual/ to the letter. I tried first with a mirror zfsroot, when I try to boot to zfsboot the screen is flooded with "init(1M) exited on fatal signal 9" Than I tried with a simple zfs pool (not mirrored) and it just reboots right away. If I try to setup grub

Dear ZFS experts, I have 2 SATA 500 GB Hard Drive on my Dual Core PC I have installed OpenSolaris 2008.11 using Live CD I got from Sun Tech Days in Singapore Now, using all the guidelines I got here at Indiana Discussion, I can''t attach my second drive to rpool to make them mirror Initially I was playing around with similar configuration in VirtualBox, and it does not succeed. Finally