Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit"
2023 Sep 02
1
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:56:42AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:45:14PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > This adds support for datagrams to the virtio-vsock device.
> > >
> > > virtio-vsock already supports stream and seqpacket types. The existing
> >
2023 Sep 02
1
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:56:42AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 02:45:14PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > This adds support for datagrams to the virtio-vsock device.
> > >
> > > virtio-vsock already supports stream and seqpacket types. The existing
> >
2023 Sep 06
0
[PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 09:24:26AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:41:28AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 04:37:19AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 09:31:03AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 12:43:03AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > > >
2015 Aug 16
1
[PATCH v2 2/2] virtio-net: add default_mtu configuration field
Sometimes it is essential for libvirt to be able to configure MTU
on guest's NICs to a value different from 1500.
The change adds a new field to configuration area of network
devices. It will be used to pass initial MTU from the device to
the driver, and to pass modified MTU from driver to the device
when a new MTU is assigned by the guest OS.
In addition, in order to support backward and
2019 Nov 22
0
[RFC virtio 12/13] virtio-iommu: Add built-in topology description
Add a lightweight method to describe the IOMMU topology in the config
space, guarded by a new feature bit. A list of capabilities in the
config space describes the devices managed by the IOMMU and their
endpoint IDs.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe at linaro.org>
---
virtio-iommu.tex | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 88 insertions(+)
2023 Aug 01
0
[PATCH RFC net-next v5 10/14] virtio/vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 04:30:22AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 09:48:21AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:38:08PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 12:50:14AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>> > > This commit adds a feature bit for virtio vsock to support datagrams.
>> > >
2018 Jun 13
0
[RFC] virtio-iommu version 0.7
This is version 0.7 of the virtio-iommu specification. The diff from 0.6,
included below, is fairly small and consists of the following changes:
* Address comments from 0.6, rework bits of the implementation notes.
* Change resv_mem parameters to be consistent with the rest of the
spec.
* Add the MMIO flag to MAP requests. At the moment it is used by
mapped MSIs mostly for completeness, but
2015 Aug 16
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] virtio-net: rephrase devconf fields description
Clarify general description of the mac, status and
max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is
vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of
the fields are non valid.
Also clarify that validity of two status bits depends on two
different feature flags.
Signed-off-by: Victor Kaplansky <victork at redhat.com>
---
content.tex | 42
2023 Mar 10
0
[PATCH net-next v3 0/3] vsock: add support for sockmap
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 07:04:33PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> Add support for sockmap to vsock.
>
> We're testing usage of vsock as a way to redirect guest-local UDS
> requests to the host and this patch series greatly improves the
> performance of such a setup.
>
> Compared to copying packets via userspace, this improves throughput by
> 121% in basic testing.
2023 Aug 04
0
[PATCH RFC net-next v5 03/14] af_vsock: support multi-transport datagrams
On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 06:58:24PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 02:42:26PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 12:53:22AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 10:24:44PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>> > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 12:53:15AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> > > >
2015 Aug 16
5
[PATCH v2 0/2] virtio-net: default_mtu - new conf. field
This set of two patches adds a new field called default_mtu to
the configuration area of network devices. The motivation is to
allow libvirt to set initial MTU different from 1500 on guests
virtual NICs. We also propose to use this new field to report
MTU changes by the guest OS to the device to facilitate
debugging and mtu tunning.
The first patch just clarify the definition of existing fields
2015 Aug 16
5
[PATCH v2 0/2] virtio-net: default_mtu - new conf. field
This set of two patches adds a new field called default_mtu to
the configuration area of network devices. The motivation is to
allow libvirt to set initial MTU different from 1500 on guests
virtual NICs. We also propose to use this new field to report
MTU changes by the guest OS to the device to facilitate
debugging and mtu tunning.
The first patch just clarify the definition of existing fields
2017 Aug 04
7
[RFC] virtio-iommu version 0.4
This is the continuation of my proposal for virtio-iommu, the para-
virtualized IOMMU. Here is a summary of the changes since last time [1]:
* The virtio-iommu document now resembles an actual specification. It is
split into a formal description of the virtio device, and implementation
notes. Please find sources and binaries at [2].
* Added a probe request to describe to the guest different
2017 Aug 04
7
[RFC] virtio-iommu version 0.4
This is the continuation of my proposal for virtio-iommu, the para-
virtualized IOMMU. Here is a summary of the changes since last time [1]:
* The virtio-iommu document now resembles an actual specification. It is
split into a formal description of the virtio device, and implementation
notes. Please find sources and binaries at [2].
* Added a probe request to describe to the guest different
2015 Aug 17
0
[PATCH v2 2/2] virtio-net: add default_mtu configuration field
On 08/16/2015 09:42 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote:
> Sometimes it is essential for libvirt to be able to configure MTU
> on guest's NICs to a value different from 1500.
>
> The change adds a new field to configuration area of network
> devices. It will be used to pass initial MTU from the device to
> the driver, and to pass modified MTU from driver to the device
> when a new
2023 Apr 14
0
[PATCH RFC net-next v2 2/4] virtio/vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM feature bit
Hi Bobby,
> /* The feature bitmap for virtio vsock */
> #define VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET 1 /* SOCK_SEQPACKET supported */
> +#define VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM 2 /* Host support dgram vsock */
Seems that bit 2 is already taken by VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_NO_IMPLIED_STREAM.
https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/commit/26ed30ccb049fd51d6e20aad3de2807d678edb3a
2023 Aug 04
0
[RFC PATCH v1 1/2] vsock: send SIGPIPE on write to shutdowned socket
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 03:46:47PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>Hi Stefano,
>
>On 02.08.2023 10:46, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 05:17:26PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>> POSIX requires to send SIGPIPE on write to SOCK_STREAM socket which was
>>> shutdowned with SHUT_WR flag or its peer was shutdowned with SHUT_RD
>>> flag.
2023 Jun 01
0
[PATCH net] virtio/vsock: fix sock refcnt bug on owner set failure
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 07:47:32PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>Previous to setting the owner the socket is found via
>vsock_find_connected_socket(), which returns sk after a call to
>sock_hold().
>
>If setting the owner fails, then sock_put() needs to be called.
>
>Fixes: f9d2b1e146e0 ("virtio/vsock: fix leaks due to missing skb owner")
>Signed-off-by: Bobby
2015 Aug 17
0
[PATCH v2 1/2] virtio-net: rephrase devconf fields description
On 08/16/2015 09:42 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote:
> Clarify general description of the mac, status and
> max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is
> vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of
> the fields are non valid.
>
> Also clarify that validity of two status bits depends on two
> different feature flags.
>
> Signed-off-by:
2023 Aug 04
0
[RFC PATCH v1 1/2] vsock: send SIGPIPE on write to shutdowned socket
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 05:34:20PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>
>
>On 04.08.2023 17:28, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 03:46:47PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>> Hi Stefano,
>>>
>>> On 02.08.2023 10:46, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 05:17:26PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>>>