similar to: Assertion raised during zfs share?

I have an Ultra 10 client running Sol10 U3 that has a zfs pool set up on the extra space of the internal ide disk. There''s just the one fs and it is shared with the sharenfs property. When this system reboots nfs/server ends up getting disabled and this is the error from the SMF logs: [ Apr 16 08:41:22 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/nfs-server start") ] [ Apr 16

Hello, we have the following problem: - a new Dell Optiplex 740 boots pxelinux.0 - loads the kernel - start to load the miniroot.gz and crashs after loading about 1/5 of the miniroot The tftpd messages are: Feb 21 14:48:32 srv006 atftpd[26225]: Advanced Trivial FTP server started (0.7) Feb 21 14:48:32 srv006 atftpd[26225]: Serving /linux/pxelinux.0 to 10.10.100.113:2070 Feb 21 14:48:32 srv006

I am trying to use Syslinux as my boot loader for a stripped down version of Knoppix (DSL) on a USB Pen Drive. I followed the instructions verbatim on http://rz-obrian.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de/knoppix-usb/knoppix-usb.html, but no luck. The system will start to boot to the USB, but gives a Kernel Panic. I will give all information that shows on the screen. After I select Boot from USB (which on my

Hello! I have a boot problem with ISOLinux 2.00, downloaded yesterday. The CD works fine with every PC except on an IBM Thinkpad. If I poweron the TP and try to boot from CD I get back a "isolinux: disk error 01, ax = 4211,8B". Then, if I reboot (ctrl-alt-canc) your isolinux works fine. May you help me? -- Stefano Pettini spettini at inwind.it New ICQ number: 159144497 Notary of

Hi, I am currently trying to replace our companies elilo UEFI PXE boot with syslinux. I compiled all the needed files and the DHCP distributes them fine to the requesting client. However when I try to boot our companies miniroot the DHCP serves the file, but it seems like it never finishes. The image is generated with the following command: find . | grep -v 'name'.bz2 | cpio -o -H newc

We want to use Nagios to monitor out puppet server so we can be notified if it goes down. We are using Fusion Passenger and Apache on Red Hat. Any suggestion for what and how to monitor? -- Thanks, Allan Marcus 505-667-5666 Allan@lanl.gov -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to

Hi There is a problem when creating a domU. I intend to install Solaris N90 on RedHat RHEL5 in paravirtualized(I''ve tried fully virtualized method, that''s no problem). #xm info release : 2.6.18-53.el5xen machine : i686 xen_caps : xen-3.0-x86_32p My steps are as follow(install via NFS): 1 mkdir disk and mkdir Solaris 2 mount /dev/cdrom /disk/Solaris, it tell me that disk

Hi All, Now that we have multiboot capable pxelinux, thanks to mboot.c32, I decided to try and remove pxegrub from my x86 jumpstart infrastructure since, in theory, pxelinux can now do it all. The problem I'm having is I'm not very sure I'm following Tim's documentation correctly... I'm not 100% what comes after the --- and whether the Sun kernel needs it's arguments

I'm having some difficulties pxe booting Solaris. So far I have tried the mboot.c32, and the pxegrub shipped with Solaris. At first I had some problems with blksize, but this disapeared when I changed from atftpd to tftpd-hpa. The point at which I'm stuck now is, the kernel and x86.microroot/x86.miniroot is loaded but then VMWare crashes. I might try with real hardware, but I thought

Hi, If I have an R object UUU, where the second element is U2, based on "g" column of my.table my.table of UUU is: mmm ggg gindex map Info aaa123 U1 1 1 1 aaa124 U1 1 2 1 bbb1378 U2 2 1 1 bbb8888 U2 2 2 0 bbb1389 U2 2 3

On 21.09.2015 12:06, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Mathias Radtke <m.radtke at uib.de> wrote: >> >> On 18.09.2015 16:35, Gene Cumm wrote: >>> 1) This is actually a critical cusp size. Watch what tftpd you use or >>> you'll never get it all. The tftpd needs to support rollover. >>> Consider HTTP as it should be more capable

Dear R helpers,   I know this is a simple task, but I'm new to R and I'm still havind difficulties with the language. I want to create 30 vectors to be used in a simulation, each with 1 columm and 5 lines, of random numbers N(0,1). What I tried was this:   N=150 u2<-rep(1:150,0) u2<-list(matrix(0,5)) u2 for(i in 1:N) { u2[i]<-rnorm(5) } u2 ### also tried this: N=150

Let me thank everyone in advance. I''ve read a number of posts here and it helped tremendously in getting the install done. I have a couple of remaining issues which I can''t seem to overcome. Here are the basics: dom0 - CentOS 5.2 32-bit Xen 3.2.1 compiles from source domU - os200805.iso The install config: [root@internetpowagroup oshman]# cat opensolaris.install name =

Dear all, Suppose I have a very long expression e. Lets assume, for simplicity, that it is e = expression(u1+u2+u3) Now I wish to replace u2 with x and u3 with 1. I.e. the 'new' expression, after replacement, should be: > e expression(u1+x+1) My question is how to do the replacement? I have tried using: > e = parse(text=gsub("u2","x",e)) > e =

Dear all, I am using the function 'D' in the 'stats' package to perform symbolic derivation. This works very well and it is much faster than e.g. Mathematica (at least for my purposes). First, I would like to thank the development team for this excellent function. However, I run into trouble in some cases, particularly when I am to do some operations on long expressions

If this is posted elsewhere I cannot find it. I need to perform multiple integration where some of the variables are in the bounds of the other variables. I was trying to use R2Cuba function but cannot set the upper and lower bounds. My code so far is : int <- function(y){ u2 = y[1] z2 = y[2] u1 =y[3] z1 = y[4] ff <- u1*(z1-u1)*u2*(z2-u2)*exp(-0.027*(12-z2)) return(ff) }

Hi, I tried a fast search about domain controller replication limit without find without finding an answer. Can someone tell me if there are time limit of correct synchronization of domain controller turned off for a long time (like some days)? If yes what should be the time limit and what is better do when need to poweron domain controller that has passed that time? Can there be issue with

Dear all, I would like to solve the following problem, which can be done with optimal control theory or dynamic programming: max(x,y) a*u1+b*u2+c*f1(u2) s.t. 0<u1<x, 0<u2<f2(x,u2), x'=f3(u1,u2,x) which can be rewritten if optimal control theory should be applied as H=a*u1+b*u2+c*f1(u2)+lambda*(x') s.t. 0<u1<x, 0<u2<f2(x,u2) The maximum principle

Hi all, I have upgraded a test machine from OpenSuSE 11.1 to 11.2. I have found following bug: the server is a 2x quadcore intel box also 2x4=8cpu If you limit the dom0 cpu with dom0-cpus= [1-7]: - [xenwatch_cb] is running 100% cpu and makes var log entry every 65 sec BUG: soft lockup - CPU#X stuck for 61s! - xm commands not work - xend is dead if set dom0-cpus to 0 or 8: - everything looks

Hi, in the code below, I am drawing 1000 samples from two beta distributions, each time using the same random number seed. Using set.seed(80) produces results I expect, in that the differences between the distributions are very small. Using set.seed(20) produces results I can't make sense of. Around half of the time, it behaves as with set.seed(80), but around half of the time, it behaves