similar to: Updating samba with bookworm-backports

18.08.2023 10:47, spindles seven via samba ?????: > On August 16, 2023 spindles seven wrote: >> roy at franks:~$ sudo apt -t bookworm-backports install samba winbind >> Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... >> Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have >> requested an impossible situation

11.03.2024 17:40, spindles seven via samba: > Hi > > After seeing that Bookworm Backports has now got Samba version 4.19.5, I decided to update my samba machines. However, I find that those running on AMD64 architecture, the update doesn't appear. Machines running on arm architectures (armel & arm64) are updated correctly. I haven't changed anything in the

Hi After seeing that Bookworm Backports has now got Samba version 4.19.5, I decided to update my samba machines. However, I find that those running on AMD64 architecture, the update doesn't appear. Machines running on arm architectures (armel & arm64) are updated correctly. I haven't changed anything in the /etc/apt/samba.lists file and previous updates have worked fine. Is

06.11.2024 12:50, spindles seven via samba wrote: > Hi > I tried to update a member server's samba version from 4.20.5 to 4.21.1 using Bookworm-backports and get the following error: > > roy at moggy:~$ sudo apt upgrade > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > Reading state information... Done > Calculating upgrade... Done > Some packages

Hi I tried to update a member server's samba version from 4.20.5 to 4.21.1 using Bookworm-backports and get the following error: roy at moggy:~$ sudo apt upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if

On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >> Hi folks, >> >> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be >> the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. >> Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba

On 30-04-2023 10:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will >>> be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released,

Hi Peter, Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: > Hi folks, > > I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be > the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. > Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba backports > for Bookworm? > > I saw a post from Michael Tokarev in this list a

Hi folks, I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba backports for Bookworm? I saw a post from Michael Tokarev in this list a while ago, that there probably wont be a Samba 4.18 for Debian Bullseye. I also saw another post about

On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>> Hi Yvan, >>> >>> Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I >>> need to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then

30.04.2023 11:20, Rowland Penny via samba ?????: .. > There is a big problem with this, bookworm hasn't been released yet and as far as I can see, there isn't a bookworm-backports yet. > The only mention of Samba 4.18 that I can see in Debian is in experimental, a long way from any backports. No, there's no long way to bookworm-backports. I use experimental just because debian

On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>>> Hi Yvan, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the information, really useful.

On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > Hi Yvan, > > Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I need > to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then getting > the newest Samba packages from Bookworm backports. It's just a little > over a month away, so there is ample time for planning upgrades. > > Best

On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: > > On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:

On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> Hi Yvan, >> >> Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I >> need to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then >> getting the newest Samba packages from Bookworm backports. It's just >> a

On 30-04-2023 12:04, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 30/04/2023 10:52, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: >>> >>> On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:

On 30/04/2023 10:52, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: >> >> On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:

On 20 January 2025 15:18 Luis Peromarta wrote: > > I hope to be able to do the same kind of tests, > On 20 Jan 2025 at 15:10 +0000, Peter Milesson <miles at atmos.eu>, wrote: > > > > I have tested with Windows 7 Pro (SP1), Windows 10 Pro (22H2), and > > Windows 11 Pro (24H2). All those clients report CMOS clock as time > > source. I also suspect that

On 16 March 2023 20:22 Michael Tokarev wrote: > 14.03.2023 13:02, spindles seven via samba wrote: > This is one of many examples why I thought it is not a good idea to have the same > version of samba packages for bullseye on my repository as on testing/unstable. > But people insisted :) > > The thing is: both my bullseye 4.17 repository and debian unstable now has version >

18.03.2023 01:56, spindles seven wrote: > On 16 March 2023 20:22 Michael Tokarev wrote: .. >> Once you remove my 4.17 repo from your sources.list, apt wont be able to find the >> right version of samba for bullseye, even if "almost" the same version is available in >> bpo11. > > Thanks for this. However, I don't understand this last statement - once I