similar to: Spotlight indexing with fscrawler for multiple shares

Hey Kees, fs2es-indexer is designed to be a lightweight alternative to FSCrawler. So no ... it doesnt do any content indexing or saves much of the metadata. As far as I understand it the OCR and other stuff makes FScrawler that big. And we dont need any of that - we just want to search for file names. BUT Im open for merge requests ;-) I currently getting away with a lot less complexity

So I have two issues. 1) Using Samba 4.19.2 with spotlight and elasticsearch 8.10.3 doesn?t work. Errors: [2023/10/22 09:04:17, 0] ../../source3/rpc_server/mdssvc/mdssvc_es.c:755(mds_es_search_http_read_done) mds_es_search_http_read_done: json_loadb failed 2) Using Samba 4.19.2 with spotlight and elasticsearch 7.17.10 works. There is a bug where when the samba server is running and files

Hello, yes sadly update 8.9 of elasticsearch broke the samba integration. Seems like 8.10 is still broken. Stay on 8.8 until this is fixed. Ive emailed Ralph B?hme of Sernet already, but hes got no time for it atm. Im not sure about the second part of your bug report though: > There is a bug where when the samba server is running and files are being indexed while samba is running finder

Hi Alexander, I'm terribly sorry. We didnt have the "ntlm auth" parameter configured on the DCs at all. I added it and it just works. Thanks for your help. Now I just need to figure out how I can make WLAN-specific LDAP-Group authentication. e. g. production WLAN needs LDAP group "wlan_production" and management WLAN needs the "wlan_management" group. I

Hi Matthias, we?re using Debian Bullseye with the backports repo. So version is a mixture of - Samba version 4.17.3-Debian - Samba version 4.17.7-Debian We?ve installed it directly on the DC?s as well. In my opinion using "ntlm auth = yes? should be fine. Did you try using a simple RADIUS secret? In my experience long secrets or ones containing special characters don?t work very well. I

I can share my notes, we authenticate UniFi clients via Freeradius against Samba AD. We also check group membership which you might or might not need: ## 4 FreeRADIUS ### 4.1 Basics ```bash apt install freeradius freeradius-ldap freeradius-utils # create new DH-params openssl dhparam -out /etc/freeradius/3.0/certs/dh 2048 ``` ### 4.2 Configure Authentication - modify mschap to use winbind,

Hello Alexander, thanks Alexander for these configuration snippets. Which version of Samba are you using? Is this on debian bullseye? Is the FreeRADIUS server installed on a DC or on a Domain Member? (I just tested the latter). is "ntlm auth = yes" OK for the DCs and the domain member or does it have to be "mschapv2-and-ntlmv2-only" for all servers (DCs + Member)? It

13.07.2023 19:17, Adi Kriegisch wrote: > Hi! > >> I was looking at the code this morning trying to figure out how to >> reject packet with lvl2 properly, - unfortunately I don't know samba >> well enough to be able to find the place "quickly" and I got distracted >> by other things. It was my first thought when someone posted the debug >> info

Dear All, Well, this is very embarrassing.... It seems that running 'smbcontrol all reload-config' isn't sufficient for reloading the ntlm config parameters. I tried restarting the whole samba service on the DC my FR box was authenticating against (systemctl restart sernet-samba-ad) and my test laptop is now connected to the network on the correct VLAN. I apologise for wasting

Hello Tim, Hello samba-people, is there an uptodate guide for authenticating via freeradius somewhere? I have some Ubiquiti APs plus a Cloud Key and I want to authenticate WLAN clients via WPA2-Enterprise instead of a (shared) PSK. It seems like https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Authenticating_Freeradius_against_Active_Directory is missing some steps (basic setup of freeradius). Can you

Hi, I'm running Samba Active Directory 4.16.9 with packages from Sernet. Domain members are Linux servers (Ubuntu 20.04, RHEL 8) with Sernet Samba 4.16.x. I'm getting crazy with group memberships syncing from AD to Linux members. It is completely random as when changes in AD group are visible in Linux OS (or more precise: winbind), it might take minutes, hours or days as when these

On 29/06/2023 07:38, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Hi, > > there is some progress, even I would'nt call it that. At least they > admitted it's caused through some changes from their side. > > @Rowland: Remember that "old Samba method" part? > > This is their answer. I don't know what to make of it. Maybe someone > with more knowledge about the

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 08:38:58 +0200 Matthias K?hne | Ellerhold Aktiengesellschaft via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello lovely samba-people, > > this morning all of our DCs (debian bookworm) upgraded their bind9 > packages to 9.18.28 (from 9.18.24). Afterwards the named service > would not come up successfully and crash after loading the DLZ: > > Jul 26

Am 28.05.2024 07:51, schrieb Christian Naumer via samba: > Am 28.05.24 um 07:34 schrieb Bestattungen Vitt - Thomas Reitelbach via > samba: >> >> Christian Naumer said, I can get Nextcloud to work without this >> insecure parameter - I'll have to figure out how I could acceppt a >> self-signed certificate on the side of apache2/php-ldap module. > > I

Hello, my smb.conf is in the first post. Im not setting unix extensions explictly, so the default is used (which is yes)? But they are only active for smb1 right? I did not activate the smb3 unix extensions. This also happens for shares that are not mounted by cifs ... e. g. we have a share that is used as a hotfolder for a RIP. The workflow is, that people mount them in MacOS and put files

17.07.2024 10:54, Matthias K?hne | Ellerhold Aktiengesellschaft via samba wrote: > Hello lovely samba-people, Hi! :) > after upgrading to 4.20 some file shares randomly get weird directories > and files in them: > > drwxrwx---+ 3 AD-ELLERHOLD\user AD-ELLERHOLD\group 4.0K May 29 01:14 ''$'\352' > drwxrwx---+ 3 AD-ELLERHOLD\user AD-ELLERHOLD\group 4.0K May

18.07.2024 13:03, Matthias K?hne | Ellerhold Aktiengesellschaft via samba wrote: > Hallo, > > yes this is an "ls -lAh" on the samba fileserver side in the > corresponding directory. > > Downgrading to 4.19 does not remove the weird directories and files. But > it prevents new weird ones being created... > > Looking at the timestamps these seem to be created

Hello Rowland, I have to recognize that asking to compile the distro version is a valid argument. Hello Michael, can you please explain, how I can compile Samba as I am using your distro (deb [signed-by=/etc/apt/mjt.key] http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba jammy/samba-4.19/)? Thanks, Joachim > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im

04.07.2024 21:27, Paul Leiber via samba wrote: > Dear Samba list, > > I have a Samba instance running as an ad-dc on debian bullseye. Some time ago, I changed the standard installation to backports with > > apt -t bullseye-backports install samba > > After a recent update, samba-ad-dc service didn't start anymore. The journal gave the following hint: > > Jul 04

Hi Louis, I used your excellent packages but also tried building from source. I?m trying to get Tracker working. Elasticsearch was simpler to get going but it doesn?t really suite the use case due to limitations in fscrawler. I actually created the mdssvc user but also tried directly under root once the dedicated user didn?t work. The problem might be somewhere in D-Bus configuration but I