similar to: Setting ACLs

Rick McNeal and I have been working on building support for sharing ZVOLs as iSCSI targets directly into ZFS. Below is the proposal I''ll be submitting to PSARC. Comments and suggestions are welcome. Adam ---8<--- iSCSI/ZFS Integration A. Overview The goal of this project is to couple ZFS with the iSCSI target in Solaris specifically to make it as easy to create and export ZVOLs

ZFS introduces a new and incompatible ACL interface into Solaris and this seems to be not yet fully completed in addition to the fact that is causes a lot of problems for software that needs to be compatible with Solaris-2.5 like star. Proof for incompatibility: create a file on UFS and set an ACL for this file. Use Sun tar cpf out file to archive this file. Unpack this archive file on ZFS

I am the maintainer of GDM, and I am noticing that GDM has a problem when running on a ZFS filesystem, as with Indiana. When GDM (the GNOME Display Manager) starts the login GUI, it runs the following commands on Solaris: /usr/bin/setfacl -m user:gdm:rwx,mask:rwx /dev/audio /usr/bin/setfacl -m user:gdm:rwx,mask:rwx /dev/audioctl It does this because the login GUI programs are run as the

Greetings! Are there any plans of using Kerberos for authentication in addition to (or in place of) SSL certificates in Puppet? Kerberos provides mutual, cryptographically strong authentication. A number of different services are Kerberos-enabled (SSH, NFSv4 and HTTP are common examples), and thus use the same authentication mechanism system-wide. At our site, almost all services and users are

Hi. I''m happy to inform that the ZFS file system is now part of the FreeBSD operating system. ZFS is available in the HEAD branch and will be available in FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE as an experimental feature. Commit log: Please welcome ZFS - The last word in file systems. ZFS file system was ported from OpenSolaris operating system. The code in under CDDL license. I''d

I''m currently prototyping a Solaris file server that will dish out user home directories and group project directories via NFSv4 and Samba. I have samba configured and integrated into our local active directory, with ACL mapping working. I''m a little confused as to the behavior of the ZFS ACL though. on a brand-new filesystem, touching a file results in: -rw-r--r-- 1 root

Hi, I dare to send you this very small patch that defines LOCKED_PASSWD_STRING for the FreeBSD operating system. The manpage had been unclear about this for a long time, up to 5.x days. Since 6.x, it has been made clearer, and thanks to Ceri Davies who highlighted this feature in OpenSSH, I made this patch. I hope this will reach OpenSSH source tree. This is not a big deal and I would add

Hello, After researching the subject on the internet I concluded that Samba should take into account Unix file acls. During my tests I found the opposite. Only Unix file mode bits are respected, and file acls are ignored. If my initial assumption is correct and Samba do respect Unix file acls, then I am doing something wrong. Please see the setup below and point to what I am doing wrong.

I'm not sure where else to ask about this, so please excuse me if this is the wrong forum. In trying to remove a 'nodump' flag on a directory with the 'chflags' command I have noticed that the 'nonodump' flag does not function. I see an open PR for the problem: o [2003/01/09] i386/46912 johan chflags nonodump fails I was wondering when this might be dealt with? Else is

Here's a bunch of changes I've made to the current portable version of OpenSSH. The aim is that the rsa_authentication flag in sshd_config can be given the values "without-nfs" This is really handy within a large organization where incorrectly secured home directories can allow authorized_keys(2) to be modified by someone other than the owner. So now rsa_authentication can take

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 1:46:53 AM > Subject: Re: [Samba] ACLs on Samba share not preserved when copying with Windows Explorer > > >> > > Hi Rowland, > > > > This Samba 3 server is joined to a Samba 4 AD domain

Some miscellaneous questions: * When you share a ZFS fs via NFS, what happens to files and filesystems that exceed the limits of NFS? * Is there a recommendation or some guidelines to help answer the question "how full should a pool be before deciding it''s time add disk space to a pool?" * Migrating pre-ZFS backups to ZFS backups: is there a better method than "restore

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:12:21 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Trying to understand why you are getting the segfault, I set up freebsd 11.0rc2 in a VM and then installed samba44, I now know where Gentoo gets its ideas from :) After freebsd built everything in the chain of required packages, it finally built Samba, I did notice two things, one it built

Dear all, what is about the support for POSIX ACL in Samba protocol implementation of SMB2 and SMB3? >From what I extracted from SNIA and SambaXP developer conference talks and as well as the official Samba Wiki, support for POSIX ACL in SMB2 and SMB3 has been completely abandonned. Am I right? If so, is there any other possibility to allow Linux Clients to natively access access control lists

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 2:19:09 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] ACLs on Samba share not preserved when copying with Windows Explorer > > Hi, is the share stored on a standalone server or an AD member server or > what ? > > Not that

Hello samba team ! On my network, I mainly manage my AD users and computers from Unix using shell scripts. So I would like to set the shares' ACLs directly from the DC with the POSIX setfacl command. When exporting with NFSv4, the POSIX ACLs are conserved. I can set the permissions the same manner as for my local users. But on DC, the "rwx" right is mapped to "full

Hello everybody, I would like to know if there is a plugin that allow us to manage advances ACL on a linux system (Debian ) Because for the moment,the idea to use "exec setfacl" to set my ACLs sounds a little bit "dirty" Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to

When somebody is hammering on the system, I want to be able to detect who''s doing it, and hopefully even what they''re doing. I can''t seem to find any way to do that. Any suggestions? Everything I can find ... iostat, nfsstat, etc ... AFAIK, just show me performance statistics and so forth. I''m looking for something more granular. Either *who* the

Thank you. Basically our problem are not the ACLs or their support per se, but that we have to manage a huge number of individual ACLS (several hundred users in more than hundred projects) in multi-petabyte filesystem and still have to keep overview and control. Our problem is more the management side. Effectively we are looking for a tool that helps us manage these permissions and we

Hello, I am the guy behind the ext2/ext3 patches for Extended Attributes and ACLs, and I've recently been asked about ACL support in rsync by Eric. Upon investigating I found that you have an ACL patch against rsync-2.5.5 [1]. I also found some other postings to rsync@lists.samba.org concerning rsync and ACLs [3]. Are there any plans for finalizing an integrating that rsync ACL patch? I