similar to: orphaned snapshots

I?ve never had such situation and I don?t recall someone sharing something similar. Most probably it?s easier to remove the node from the TSP and re-add it.Of course , test the case in VMs just to validate that it?s possible to add a mode to a cluster with snapshots. I have a vague feeling that you will need to delete all snapshots. Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov? On Thursday, August 10, 2023, 4:36

Hi, I have a 5-nodes GlusterFS cluster with Distributed-Replicate. There are 180 bricks in total. The OS is CentOS6.5, and GlusterFS is 3.11.0. I find many bricks are offline when we generate some empty files and rename them. I see xfs call trace in every node. For example, Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: XFS (rdc00d28p2): Internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1948 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c.

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Paul <flypen at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a 5-nodes GlusterFS cluster with Distributed-Replicate. There are > 180 bricks in total. The OS is CentOS6.5, and GlusterFS is 3.11.0. I find > many bricks are offline when we generate some empty files and rename them. > I see xfs call trace in every node. > > For example, > Nov 16

Hi I am trying to get shadow_copy2 to read gluster snapshots and provide the users with previous versions of their files. Here is my smb.conf: [global] ??????? security = ADS ??????? workgroup = AD ??????? realm = AD.XXX.XX ??????? netbios name = A32X ??????? log file = /var/log/samba/%m ??????? log level = 1 ??????? idmap config * : backend = tdb ??????? idmap config * : range =

Hi Sebastian, why are you using shadow:snapprefix if this is just ?snap?? Does it work using ONLY shadow:format = snap_GMT-%Y.%m.%d-%H.%M.%S ? If you use snapprefix you also need to use shadow:delimiter (in your case this would be ?_?). However, I never managed to get it working with snapprefix on my machines. Alexander > On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 2:52 PM, Sebastian Neustein via samba

On 8/18/23 09:55, Sebastian Neustein via samba wrote: > With the default settings of vfs_acl_xattr samba takes posix acls into > account when delivering data - how can I activate > "acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes" > without loosing the information saved in posix acls? Background: our > future file system won't be able to support acls. Sorry, but this is

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 9:32?AM Sebastian Neustein via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hi Alexander > > # net conf delparm projects shadow:snapprefix > does not change a thing. The error persists. (I killed my smb session > before trying again). > > log still says: > [2023/05/22 15:23:23.324179, 1] >

22 May 2023 8:11:33 pm Sebastian Neustein via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > I found an error when the samba client is mounting the gluster volume in the gluster logs (/var/log/glusterfs/snaps/glvol_samba/snapd.log) > [2023-05-22 12:52:09.438169 +0000] E [server-handshake.c:156:server_first_lookup] 0-snapd-glvol_samba: lookup on root failed: argument is not valid > (the last

On Wed, 2023-05-24 at 14:38 +0200, Sebastian Neustein via samba wrote: > > In addition to that there will be a log file corresponding to the > > FUSE mount of GlusterFS volume under /var/log/glusterfs with mount > > point as log file name? Please check if there are any warning/error > > entries while trying to list previous versions from windows. > Yes, there is a file

Does you filesystem support extended attributes? What does "|getfattr -n security.NTACL |filename" return?|| On 30.01.2024 16:13, Peter Milesson wrote: > Hi folks, > > It seems that the setting acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes reduces > Windows compatibility when defined for a share. In all attempts I have > used Windows tools (except editing smb.conf) > > Assume

The gluster side looks like this: root at B741:~# gluster volume get glvol_samba features.show-snapshot-directory features.show-snapshot-directory???????? on root at B741:~# gluster volume get glvol_samba features.uss features.uss???????????????????????????? enable I found an error when the samba client is mounting the gluster volume in the gluster logs

Hi Ralph > On 8/18/23 09:55, Sebastian Neustein via samba wrote: >> With the default settings of vfs_acl_xattr samba takes posix acls >> into account when delivering data - how can I activate >> "acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes" >> without loosing the information saved in posix acls? Background: our >> future file system won't be able to support

> Does it make a difference if you re-mount the volume without 'acl' > option? Even otherwise can you try listing the snapshot contents from > the server as a user(and not super user) who in reality tries to list > previous versions from Windows? I feel like it has something to do with > permissions setup for the user accessing the share. It does make a difference! First

Hi Alexander # net conf delparm projects shadow:snapprefix does not change a thing. The error persists. (I killed my smb session before trying again). log still says: [2023/05/22 15:23:23.324179,? 1] ../../source3/modules/vfs_shadow_copy2.c:2222(shadow_copy2_get_shadow_copy_data) ? shadow_copy2_get_shadow_copy_data: SMB_VFS_NEXT_OPEN failed for

Sebastian Neustein wrote: > I have to migrate our data from one old samba server to a new one. Due > to various reasons we had to change some settings. Now I struggle to > get the acls right. > ?Previously the acls were stored via posix and extended attributes, > now they are stored only in extended attributes With the default settings of vfs_acl_xattr samba takes posix acls

On 8/21/23 18:20, Sebastian Neustein wrote: > The storage has come a long way with various changes of the smb.conf. It > is possible that at the time of creation of a file/directory > vfs_acl_xattr was not active. This could mean that the directory does > not have any extended attributes written to it and ACLs are only defined > with POSIX ACLs. In this case I would need a

Hi folks, It seems that the setting acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes reduces Windows compatibility when defined for a share. In all attempts I have used Windows tools (except editing smb.conf) Assume there is a share, where the files and folders in the share root should at least be readable by anybody having access to the share. For the sake of simplicity the following permissions apply on

> the third instead failed: > >> samba-tool domain level raise --domain-level=2016 --forest-level=2016 >> ERROR(<class 'AttributeError'>): uncaught exception - 'NoneType' >> object has no attribute 'startswith' >> ? File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", >> line 279, in _run >> ??? return

Hi, I have to migrate our data from one old samba server to a new one. Due to various reasons we had to change some settings. Now I struggle to get the acls right. old smb.conf: [global] ??????? log file = /var/log/samba/%m ??????? realm = AD.XXXXXX ??????? security = ADS ??????? template homedir = /home/%U ??????? template shell = /bin/bash ??????? winbind use default domain = Yes

On Thu, 2023-05-25 at 16:45 +0200, Sebastian Neustein wrote: > > Does it make a difference if you re-mount the volume without 'acl' > > option? Even otherwise can you try listing the snapshot contents > > from the server as a user(and not super user) who in reality tries > > to list previous versions from Windows? I feel like it has > > something to do with