similar to: Samba-AD in Docker

On Monday, August 7, 2023 6:05:03 AM EDT Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > https://github.com/samba-in-kubernetes > Andrew, thanks a bunch for pointing people to our org! I really appreciate it. More below... > On Mon, 2023-08-07 at 11:08 +0200, Joachim Lindenberg via samba wrote: > > Hello Anantha, Michael, > > IIRC this is somewhat optimistic or a secret sausage. For

Hello Marc, Upgrade DNS worked properly as you can see below. --------- samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information DNS accounts already exist No zone file /usr/local/samba/private/dns/EXZA.LOCAL.zone # is this the culprit? DNS records will be automatically created DNS partitions already exist dns-dc account already exists See

Hello Rowland, ldap search command throws error as below. I am unable to search ldap. ------- ldap_initialize( ldap://dc.exza.local:3268 ) ldap_start_tls: Can't contact LDAP server (-1) Enter LDAP Password: ldap_sasl_bind(SIMPLE): Can't contact LDAP server (-1) ---------- I am using BIND_DLZ dns back end. and server is listening on 3268 and 3269 -- Thanks & Regards, Anantha

Hi, We were running Samba-AD - Version 4.7.6 for over 2 years without any errors. We have 4 Domain Controllers in our setup and DNS is BIND_DLZ (BIND 9.9.4). Off late (since 8th June 2019) we upgraded the Samba-AD version to 4.10.4 and all of sudden we started receiving the error "RPC Server not available" when we are trying to join the new PCs to domain. After multiple attempts

My dockerfile: FROM python:3 WORKDIR /usr/src/app COPY requirements.txt ./ COPY languageserver-master ./ COPY radian-master ./ RUN pip3 install --no-cache-dir -r requirements.txt EXPOSE 8080 RUN apt-key adv --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key 'E19F5F87128899B192B1A2C2AD5F960A256A04AF' RUN echo "deb http://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian buster-cran40/" >>

I continue to receive an error installing R via dockerfile on a buster image python:3. E: The value 'buster-cran40' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a release is not available in the sources My starting point is the debian buster based Python:3 image adding a couple of python specific configurations and then using the commands in the R project documentation for installing R on

On 8 July 2024 at 19:32, marcoblanchette at icloud.com wrote: | Oh, again, sorry for the spam but the problem Lauren is seeing is when she is | trying to sign the key. Installing gnugpg usually takes care of that problem. I am not sure about that. For jammy, my current (and used) rocker/r2u:jammy Dockerfile is https://github.com/rocker-org/r2u/blob/master/jammy/Dockerfile and it does what

No sure why you?re doubting me but if one would like the minimal Dockerfile following the CRAN recommendations at https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/, one would simply do FROM ubuntu:22.04 USER root ENV DEBIAN_FRONTEND noninteractive ## Configure Ubuntu for R install RUN apt update \ && apt install -y --no-install-recommends \ software-properties-common \ gnupg2 \

Hi, We upgraded from Samba version 4.15.9 to 4.18.1 on last Saturday. We are running AD-DC Service. Our upgrade process was nothing but a fresh compile & installation and add the samba instance to AD-DC cluster as a Domain Controller and demote and remove the old one. Of 5 server, there are no issues. 2 of them experiencing slowness and in the logs we are seeing

I have to support a legacy build that runs on CentOS 6. I?m new to Docker and would like to use the official CentOS 6.10 image (https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-images/blob/da050e2fc6c28d8d72d8bf78c49537247b5ddf76/docker/Dockerfile <https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-images/blob/da050e2fc6c28d8d72d8bf78c49537247b5ddf76/docker/Dockerfile>) as a Docker container on

Hi, Setting up a test environment for 4.19 rc2. However, can't we raise the lowest functional level higher than 2008 R2 in 4.18.x? Thanks & Regards, Anantha Raghava H A DISCLAIMER: This e-mail communication and any attachments may be privileged and confidential to Exzatech Consulting And Services Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, and are intended only for the use of the recipients named above

Hi Dirk and Marco, I need to test some of the suggested solutions and circle back here. Thank you so much for your help. Br, Lauren -- Lauren J. Gerber Bioinformatician Precision Systems Medicine (Kallioniemi) Research Group iCAN ? Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM) Nordic EMBL Partnership for Molecular Medicine Biomedicum Helsinki 2U,

Lauren, I am now back home where looking into these things is a little easier. From your first email to me, I started off with the selenium container you mentioned as your starting point. And that basically is your issue. It is a 'high-level' container, and it sets a user. (Essentially) all other Dockerfiles you have seen and been pointed at are 'lower-level' and operate as root

Hi Dirk, Thank you so much for looking into this when you got home. I greatly appreciate it. I was actually in the midst of writing to everyone the following message: ?. ?. ?. Hi All, I have some good news. ? My docker image is now up-to-date with R version 4.4.1. I first had to clear a bunch of unused data using docker system prune ?force. Apparently, it cleared over 32.53 gigs of data, and

Oh, again, sorry for the spam but the problem Lauren is seeing is when she is trying to sign the key. Installing gnugpg usually takes care of that problem. From: marcoblanchette at icloud.com <marcoblanchette at icloud.com> Date: Monday, July 8, 2024 at 12:26?PM To: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> Cc: Gerber, Lauren J <lauren.gerber at helsinki.fi>, r-sig-debian at

Hi, Our Domain controller environment is working for over 6 years without a break. It started with Samba Version 4.6.5 and today running 4.18.5. We have only Windows 10 clients across our organisation. Off late, we have observed that GPOs are not getting updated when we change some GPOs and link them to some specific OUs. For example, previously, we had not allowed one specific network path

Lauren, little oversight from my Dockerfile, if you want to follow the CRAN steps and get the R from the cloud.r-project.org server, you want to replace && add-apt-repository -y "ppa:marutter/rrutter4.0" With && add-apt-repository "deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu $(lsb_release -cs)-cran40/" The ppa repo is Michael Rutter personal repo

Hi Marco, Thank you for the follow up email. In the line below, do I replace $(lsb-release -cs) with jammy (Ubuntu 22.04) or leave it alone: Add-apt-repository ?deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu jammy-cran40/? It?s good to know about installations for Bioconductor. I am not currently using it, but I may need it in the future for other projects. Br, Lauren -- Lauren J. Gerber

Yes, keep the $(lsb-release -cs) there. This allows you to change the version of the OS without having to change anything else (for instance we are migrating all of our docker to 24.04 LTS right now, so we only have to modify the FROM entry and all of our Dockerfile will still work). From: Gerber, Lauren J <lauren.gerber at helsinki.fi> Date: Thursday, July 11, 2024 at 2:21?AM To:

Hmm? It?s picking up the pre-made binary from ppa:marutter/rrutter4.0 using apt-get install. Isn?t it what Lauren?s trying to do? From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> Date: Monday, July 8, 2024 at 11:57?AM To: marcoblanchette at icloud.com <marcoblanchette at icloud.com> Cc: Gerber, Lauren J <lauren.gerber at helsinki.fi>, r-sig-debian at r-project.org <r-sig-debian