similar to: [PATCH 0/2] vdpa/mlx5: Fixes for ASID handling

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "[PATCH 0/2] vdpa/mlx5: Fixes for ASID handling"

2023 Sep 09
4
[PATCH RFC v2 0/4] vdpa: decouple reset of iotlb mapping from device reset
In order to reduce needlessly high setup and teardown cost of iotlb mapping during live migration, it's crucial to decouple the vhost-vdpa iotlb abstraction from the virtio device life cycle, i.e. iotlb mappings should be left intact across virtio device reset [1]. For it to work, the on-chip IOMMU parent device should implement a separate .reset_map() operation callback to restore 1:1 DMA
2023 Sep 09
4
[PATCH RFC v3 0/4] vdpa: decouple reset of iotlb mapping from device reset
In order to reduce needlessly high setup and teardown cost of iotlb mapping during live migration, it's crucial to decouple the vhost-vdpa iotlb abstraction from the virtio device life cycle, i.e. iotlb mappings should be left intact across virtio device reset [1]. For it to work, the on-chip IOMMU parent device should implement a separate .reset_map() operation callback to restore 1:1 DMA
2023 Sep 09
0
[PATCH RFC v2 2/4] vdpa/mlx5: implement .reset_map driver op
Today, mlx5_vdpa gets started by preallocate 1:1 DMA mapping at device creation time, while this 1:1 mapping will be implicitly destroyed when the first .set_map call is invoked. Everytime when the .reset callback is invoked, any mapping left behind will be dropped then reset back to the initial 1:1 DMA mapping. In order to reduce excessive memory mapping cost during live migration, it is
2023 Feb 15
1
[PATCH v3] vdpa/mlx5: should not activate virtq object when suspended
Otherwise the virtqueue object to instate could point to invalid address that was unmapped from the MTT: mlx5_core 0000:41:04.2: mlx5_cmd_out_err:782:(pid 8321): CREATE_GENERAL_OBJECT(0xa00) op_mod(0xd) failed, status bad parameter(0x3), syndrome (0x5fa1c), err(-22) Fixes: cae15c2ed8e6 ("vdpa/mlx5: Implement susupend virtqueue callback") Cc: Eli Cohen <elic at nvidia.com>
2023 Feb 16
1
[PATCH v3] vdpa/mlx5: should not activate virtq object when suspended
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 9:31 AM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu at oracle.com> wrote: > > Otherwise the virtqueue object to instate could point to invalid address > that was unmapped from the MTT: > > mlx5_core 0000:41:04.2: mlx5_cmd_out_err:782:(pid 8321): > CREATE_GENERAL_OBJECT(0xa00) op_mod(0xd) failed, status > bad parameter(0x3), syndrome (0x5fa1c), err(-22) > >
2023 Feb 16
1
[PATCH v3] vdpa/mlx5: should not activate virtq object when suspended
On 2/15/2023 8:48 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 9:31 AM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu at oracle.com> wrote: >> Otherwise the virtqueue object to instate could point to invalid address >> that was unmapped from the MTT: >> >> mlx5_core 0000:41:04.2: mlx5_cmd_out_err:782:(pid 8321): >> CREATE_GENERAL_OBJECT(0xa00) op_mod(0xd) failed, status
2020 Aug 21
3
[PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Avoid warnings about shifts on 32-bit platforms
Clang warns several times when building for 32-bit ARM along the lines of: drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c:1462:31: warning: shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow] ndev->mvdev.mlx_features |= BIT(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This is related to the BIT macro, which uses an unsigned long literal,
2020 Aug 21
3
[PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Avoid warnings about shifts on 32-bit platforms
Clang warns several times when building for 32-bit ARM along the lines of: drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c:1462:31: warning: shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow] ndev->mvdev.mlx_features |= BIT(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This is related to the BIT macro, which uses an unsigned long literal,
2020 Jul 16
0
[PATCH vhost next 09/10] vdpa/mlx5: Add shared memory registration code
Hi Eli, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on next-20200715] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Eli-Cohen/VDPA-support-for-Mellanox-ConnectX-devices/20200716-155039 base: ca0e494af5edb59002665bf12871e94b4163a257 config: i386-allyesconfig (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-14) 9.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
2023 Feb 06
7
[PATCH v4 0/6] features provisioning fixes and mlx5_vdpa support
This patchset is pre-requisite to export and provision device config attributes and features for vdpa live migration, in a way backward and forward compatibility can be retained. The follow up work [1] will need to be built around the new feature provisioning uAPI, with which it's easier to formalize migration compatibility support at the driver level. Thanks, -Siwei [1] [PATCH v3 0/4] vDPA:
2023 Jan 30
6
[PATCH 0/6] features provisioning fixes and mlx5_vdpa support
This patchset is pre-requisite to export and provision device config attributes and features for vdpa live migration, in a way backward and forward compatibility can be retained. The follow up work [1] will need to be built around the new feature provisioning uAPI, with which it's easier to formalize migration compatibility support at the driver level. Thanks, -Siwei [1] [PATCH v3 0/4] vDPA:
2023 Feb 03
6
[PATCH v3 0/6] features provisioning fixes and mlx5_vdpa support
This patchset is pre-requisite to export and provision device config attributes and features for vdpa live migration, in a way backward and forward compatibility can be retained. The follow up work [1] will need to be built around the new feature provisioning uAPI, with which it's easier to formalize migration compatibility support at the driver level. Thanks, -Siwei [1] [PATCH v3 0/4] vDPA:
2023 Jan 31
7
[PATCH v2 0/7] features provisioning fixes and mlx5_vdpa support
This patchset is pre-requisite to export and provision device config attributes and features for vdpa live migration, in a way backward and forward compatibility can be retained. The follow up work [1] will need to be built around the new feature provisioning uAPI, with which it's easier to formalize migration compatibility support at the driver level. Thanks, -Siwei [1] [PATCH v3 0/4] vDPA:
2023 Jul 04
1
[PATCH] mlx5_vdpa: offer VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK
On 7/3/2023 8:46 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 04:25:14PM +0200, Eugenio P?rez wrote: >> Offer this backend feature as mlx5 is compatible with it. It allows it >> to do live migration with CVQ, dynamically switching between passthrough >> and shadow virtqueue. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eugenio P?rez <eperezma at redhat.com> > Same
2020 Nov 01
12
[PATCH mlx5-next v1 00/11] Convert mlx5 to use auxiliary bus
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro at nvidia.com> Changelog: v1: * Renamed _mlx5_rescan_driver to be mlx5_rescan_driver_locked like in other parts of the mlx5 driver. * Renamed MLX5_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL_VDPA to tbe MLX5_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL_VNET as a preparation to coming series from Eli C. * Some small naming renames in mlx5_vdpa. * Refactored adev index code to make Parav's SF series
2020 Sep 28
0
[PATCH V1 vhost-next] vdpa/mlx5: Make vdpa core driver a distinct module
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:32:31PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > Change core vdpa functionality into a loadbale module such that upcoming > block implementation will be able to use it. > > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic at nvidia.com> Why don't we merge this patch together with the block module? > --- > V0 --> V1: > Removed "default n" for configu options
2020 Sep 29
0
[PATCH V1 vhost-next] vdpa/mlx5: Make vdpa core driver a distinct module
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:20:26AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:55:09PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:32:31PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > Change core vdpa functionality into a loadbale module such that upcoming > > > block implementation will be able to use it. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eli
2020 Sep 29
0
[PATCH V1 vhost-next] vdpa/mlx5: Make vdpa core driver a distinct module
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:34:33AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:26:44AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:20:26AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:55:09PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:32:31PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > > > Change core
2020 Sep 29
0
[PATCH V1 vhost-next] vdpa/mlx5: Make vdpa core driver a distinct module
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:57:44AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:51:12AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:34:33AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:26:44AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:20:26AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep
2020 Jul 16
0
[PATCH vhost next 10/10] vdpa/mlx5: Add VDPA driver for supported mlx5 devices
On 2020/7/16 ??3:23, Eli Cohen wrote: > Add a front end VDPA driver that registers in the VDPA bus and provides > networking to a guest. The VDPA driver creates the necessary resources > on the VF it is driving such that data path will be offloaded. > > Notifications are being communicated through the driver. > > Currently, only VFs are supported. In subsequent patches we will