similar to: Latest 9-Stream ISO fails to boot after install

Hello, I''m configuring my linux server with puppet open and is ok. My question is the next; I''ve a declared in mi nodes.pp the next: [.............] node ''basenode'' { include ''baseos'' include ''motd'' import ''useradd.pp'' } #All nodes for my domain node /.*\.example\.com/ inherits

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:37:20 -0500 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > "This system is not registered to Red Hat Subscription Management. You can use > subscription-manager to register." It sounds like you have something installed that doesn't need to be or shouldn't be installed. Under what circumstances does that message appear? I haven't seen it on any of my C8 systems,

All, While updating my package using dnf update all I allow dnf to clean some package with unresolved dependencies. I would like to reinstall some of them but got an error message "but none of the providers can be installed" during the install process as dnf is trying to install the dependencies. . This happens for some critical package like boost-openmpi-devel (see below for

Hi guys, Does your 'mock' work when used with 'centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64' config? It fails for me with every rpm packages I tried: -> $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock --localrepo=/devs/var/www/dnf.repo --chain --continue rpmbuild/rpm.src/pass-1.7.4-6.el9.src.rpm ... CentOS Stream 9 - BaseOS 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB???? 00:00 The GPG keys listed for the

I am doing a dnf install package_without_version for instance for g++: [piot at paris opal]$ sudo dnf install gcc-c++ Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:06 ago on Thu 16 Jan 2020 06:45:59 AM CST. Error: Problem: package gcc-8.3.1-4.5.el8.x86_64 requires glibc-devel >= 2.2.90-12, but none of the providers can be installed - package glibc-devel-2.28-72.el8.i686 requires glibc-headers, but

><snip> > > I'll post here again once we have pushed the EL8 and CentOS Stream updates. > >OK .. I have also now pushed the CentOS Linux 8 update .. you should see >an update to SHIM .. the new versions are: > >PowerTools/x86_64/os/Packages/shim-unsigned-x64-15-8.el8.x86_64.rpm >BaseOS/x86_64/os/Packages/shim-ia32-15-15.el8_2.x86_64.rpm

Good afternoon from Singapore, May I know roughly how many more months before CentOS 8.0 will be released? https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8 Thank you very much. -----BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE----- The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs): [The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of U.S. Embassy Workers Link:

It is generally used together with BaseOS (which contains a restricted set of packages), so add it to the preconfigured repositories by default. --- builder/templates/make-template.ml | 27 +++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/builder/templates/make-template.ml b/builder/templates/make-template.ml index 8d26177bf..a4e2f37fb 100755 ---

On 16/10/19 02:31, Ranbir wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Has anyone tried to install BackupPC v4 on CentOS 8 from epel? I just did and this happened: > > [root at resurrect ~]# dnf --enablerepo epel install BackupPC > Last metadata expiration check: 0:18:41 ago on Tue 15 Oct 2019 08:03:59 PM EDT. > Error: > Problem: conflicting requests > - nothing provides

At 06:10 AM 8/2/2020, you wrote: >On 8/2/20 8:04 AM, david wrote: > > > >> <snip> > > > > > > > >> > I'll post here again once we have pushed the EL8 and CentOS Stream > >> updates. > >> > >> OK .. I have also now pushed the CentOS Linux 8 update .. you should see > >> an update to SHIM .. the new

This is a quick recovery and fix for the machines rendered unbootable after the grub2/shim yum update. It is written for CentOS 8.2.2004 but similar should work for any CentOS 8 or 7 as long as you get the correct shim file, that is, the one from the latest installation media. I am running on an x86_64 architecture (see uname -i). Please use the correct shim file for your architecture

On 01/05/2023 15:10, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > Hi guys, > > Does your 'mock' work when used with 'centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64' config? > It fails for me with every rpm packages I tried: > > -> $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock > --localrepo=/devs/var/www/dnf.repo --chain --continue > rpmbuild/rpm.src/pass-1.7.4-6.el9.src.rpm

Where can we learn more about the workflow and software used to build CentOS RPMs and iso images? This will be extremely helpful to everyone facing the same challenges of building a custom distro. Thank you all for the hard work on CentOS. On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 7:44 AM Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 7/10/19 1:18 AM, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > >

On 8/2/20 2:04 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > > Il 01/08/20 22:03, Greg Bailey ha scritto: >> On 8/1/20 6:56 AM, david wrote: >>> At 02:54 AM 8/1/2020, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>>> Hi Johnny, >>>> thank you very much for clarification. >>>> >>>> You said that in the centos infrastructure only one server got the >>>>

Hi, I am looking for centos-release-8.1-1.1911.0.9.el8.src.rpm. Does anyone know where to find it. The only thing I see in vault is centos-release-8.1-1.1911.0.8.el8.src.rpm. Regards, -- Tom me at tdiehl.org

--On Friday, October 25, 2019 6:39 PM -0700 Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> wrote: > I may have to pull the coreutils-8.30-6.el8.x86_64 sources to see how ls > makes these decisions. I pulled the coreutils SRPM and it won't build because it wants texinfo and dnf says it doesn't exist, using either the builddep or search subcommands. (There may be other builddep

Following some update or the other (I think) on my CentOS Stream 8 system, I'm no longer able to use ping as a regular user; I get $ ping www.centos.org ping: socket: Operation not permitted Does anyone else see this? It it a bug, or were the system/default permissions deliberately changed? Can anyone suggest a fix/workaround? Actually, I can find several different ones via a simple web

At 06:37 AM 8/2/2020, Johnny Hughes wrote: >On 8/2/20 8:30 AM, david wrote: > > At 06:10 AM 8/2/2020, you wrote: > >> On 8/2/20 8:04 AM, david wrote: > >> > > >> >> <snip> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > I'll post here again once we have pushed the EL8 and CentOS Stream > >>

Hi, Nux! Can you re-paste this cfg? The url is outdated. - robin On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > Hi, > > Here's how my epel-7-i386.cfg mock file looks like: > http://fpaste.org/164110/19877702/raw/ > > Do note the 32bit packages are unofficial and unsupported. RedHat does not > support 32bit in EL7. > > HTH > Lucian >

> > Simon and others > Here's a very simple and hopefully reproducible test-case > > Select as your boot ISO: > ?CentOS-8.1.1911-x86_64-dvd1.iso > Choose to reclaim all space on the disk > Choose 'Minimal Install' as the software selection > Connect yourself to the network (I use a wired connection) > Don't bother creating a user, just provide your