similar to: Export ZFS over NFS ?

When somebody is hammering on the system, I want to be able to detect who''s doing it, and hopefully even what they''re doing. I can''t seem to find any way to do that. Any suggestions? Everything I can find ... iostat, nfsstat, etc ... AFAIK, just show me performance statistics and so forth. I''m looking for something more granular. Either *who* the

I have Solaris 10 U7 that is exporting ZFS filesytem. The client is Solaris 9 U7. I can mount the filesytem just fine but I am unable to write to it. showmount -e shows my mount is set for everyone. the dfstab file has option rw set. So what gives? Phillip -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

I noticed an oddity on my 2008.05 box today. Created a new zfs file system that I was planning to nfs share out to an old FreeBSD box, after I put sharenfs=on for it, I noticed there was a bunch of others shared too: -bash-3.2# dfshares -F nfs RESOURCE SERVER ACCESS TRANSPORT reaver:/store/movies reaver - - reaver:/export

I started sharing out zfs filesystems via NFS last week using sharenfs=on. That seems to work fine until I reboot. Turned out the NFS server wasn''t enabled - I had to enable nfs/server, nfs/lockmgr and nfs/status manually. This is a stock SXCR b49 (ZFS root) install - don''t think I''d changed anything much. Shouldn''t a ZFS share be permanently enabling NFS?

Hi everyone, I have just installed Solaris and have added a 3x500GB raidz drive array. I am able to use this pool (''tank'') successfully locally, but when I try to share it remotely, I can only read, I cannot execute or write. I didn''t do anything other than the default ''zfs set sharenfs=on tank''... how can I get it so that any allowed user can access

Hi everyone, I have just installed Solaris and have added a 3x500GB raidz drive array. I am able to use this pool (''tank'') successfully locally, but when I try to share it remotely, I can only read, I cannot execute or write. I didn''t do anything other than the default ''zfs set sharenfs=on tank''... how can I get it so that any allowed user can access

Has there been any discussion here about the idea integrating a virtual IP into ZFS. It makes sense to me because of the integration of NFS and iSCSI with the sharenfs and shareiscsi properties. Since these are both dependent on an IP it would be pretty cool if there was also a virtual IP that would automatically move with the pool. Maybe something like "zfs set ip.nge0=x.x.x.x mypool"

I have an Ultra 10 client running Sol10 U3 that has a zfs pool set up on the extra space of the internal ide disk. There''s just the one fs and it is shared with the sharenfs property. When this system reboots nfs/server ends up getting disabled and this is the error from the SMF logs: [ Apr 16 08:41:22 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/nfs-server start") ] [ Apr 16

I''ve got quite the ActiveRecord challenge, any help would be appreciated. In my current project Companies can have many reviews. class Company < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :reviews, :as => :reviewable end However, my company table, I have two different IDs to identify my company. id - This is the typical id we use for normal stuff other_company_id - This is the id we use

Please help, I have an application I switched over to UTF-8, but I am unable to decode URLs with unicode characters in them properly. For instance, if I have "item=Pur%E9ed" as a parameter in my url, when it''s decoded by rails, it returns "Pur?ed" and not "Pur?ed". Is there an easy way to fix my controller to accept these characters properly?

Hola a tod en s, tengo una duda que se relaciona con alternativas al uso de variables globales. En principio, si se quiere usar un generador de v.a con la librería Runuran sólo se permite definir las funciones de densidad (o el núcleo de las mismas) con funciones con un único argumento en (x). Sin embargo, necesito pasar a las funciones más argumentos que van cambiando en las iteraciones de

x86 snv 108 I have a pool with around 5300 file systems called home. I can do: zfs set sharenfs=on home however zfs set sharenfs="sec=krb5,rw" home complains: cannot set property for ''home'': ''sharenfs'' cannot be set to invalid options I feel I must be overlooking something elementary. Thanks, Alastair -------------- next part --------------

I have a pool with 3 partitions in it. However, one of them is no longer valid, the disk was removed and modified so that the original partition is no longer available. I cannot get zpool to remove it from the pool. How do I tell zfs to take this item out of the pool if not with "zfs remove" ? Thanks, Wyllys here is my pool: zpool status pool: bigpool state: FAULTED status:

Please help, Does anyone know how to override the Mongrel request URI limits built in? I know it was set at a 512 byte limit, but my application will not work with this in place. Why do I need a larger limit? I''ve written a rails application that uses a bookmarklet to send large amounts of data from site to site. The only way to do this is (and keep it cross browser

Hi, I''ve encountered this bug: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=108316&tstart=30 and to obviate to the problem I''m using legacy mounts. Now the system boot without problems, but nfs server doesn''t start because couldn''t find any share. So I''ve disabled nfs with zfs set sharenfs=off on my zfs filesystems and tried to use the share

I saw in another post that a best practices doc will be coming, but I figured I would try to get this working. I''m trying to understand why zfs uses so many "zfs create" so I can use it better. What makes sense is that each zfs fs can have it''s own options (compression, nfs, atime, quota, etc). I really love this because it is so tuneable -- compression on these

I am trying to configure a system where I have two different NFS shares which point to the same directory. The idea is if you come in via one path, you will have read-only access and can''t delete any files, if you come in the 2nd path, then you will have read/write access. For example, create the read/write nfs share: zfs create tank/snapshots zfs set sharenfs=on tank/snapshots root

Hey guys, I wanted to share with you guys a detailed tutorial I just finished this weekend for using Acts_As_Ferret. http://www.railsenvy.com/2007/2/19/acts-as-ferret-tutorial I started using Ferret and Acts_As_Ferret a few weeks ago, and I learned so much that I wanted to give back to the community by writing up a helpful tutorial that covers all the key topics in one

Given this test message, with admittedly incorrect QP encoding: ---- From: Test <test at example.com> Subject: Test Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain To: Test <test at example.com> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:54:10 +0000 Message-Id: <1 at example.com> https://example.com/?from=bsu&url=http%3A//www.example.com/ ----

-bash-3.2$ zfs share tank cannot share ''tank'': share(1M) failed -bash-3.2$ how do i figure out what''s wrong? This message posted from opensolaris.org