similar to: samba@lists.samba.org

Hi! Have you read? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Samba_DC_to_an_Existing_Active_Directory#Preparing_the_Host_for_Joining_the_Domain Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> escreveu no dia domingo, 16/07/2023 ?(s) 07:23: > I am planning up upgrading my AD/DC from Samba version 4.8.2 to the most > recent > version in my Slackware distro which is currently

On 28/01/2023 06:44, Mark Foley via samba wrote: > I wrote earlier about setting the domain user password minimum to > 14 > characters. It was advised that my first step should be to upgrade from Samba > 4.8.2 to the most recent version available which for my Slackware 15.0 distro is > 4.15.5. This also involved a distro upgrade from Slackware 14.2 to 15.0. > > After

On Sat Jan 28 02:37:16 2023 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 28/01/2023 06:44, Mark Foley via samba wrote: > > I wrote earlier about setting the domain user password minimum to > 14 > > characters. It was advised that my first step should be to upgrade from Samba > > 4.8.2 to the most recent version available which for my Slackware 15.0

Hello Together Please i have here a little company with any exisiting internal DNS Server "BIND 9.11.5-P4-5.1-Debian (Extended Support Version) <id:998753c>" Today i compilled the release Samba 4.10.7 successfully on any new machine here..... i read on Samba org the following News. - Do not use the BIND9_FLATFILE DNS back end. It is not supported and will be removed

On 05/08/2019 09:55, Patrik via samba wrote: > the dig is wrong as well, it adds an additional ip address, which i have > not request to use other interfaces: > root at server:/# dig p3x-dc.patrikx3.com > Patrik, I have told you what your problem is, refusing to accept that you have setup Bind9 incorrectly is no reason for opening a new thread. Just in case you missed it, or

Hi, I'm curious about this remark on the wiki[1] : "do NOT use NONE as the DNS backend, it is not supported and will be removed in a future Samba version." Why is this being removed? I would prefer to manually add the records that would be generated by BIND9_FLATFILE to my domain's zone file. We have automation that controls records in the domain's zone file that I

On 29/01/2023 18:58, Mark Foley via samba wrote: > I am torn between using Heimdal and MIT. On the one hand, I really like > to use the packages supplied by the distro with as little > "customization" as possible, which in my case would be MIT. On the other > hand, my initial DC deployment using Slackware 14.1 back in 2014 > apparently did use Heimdal. And it appears

On Jul 24 13:30:11 2023 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 24/07/2023 17:46, Mark Foley via samba wrote: > > I removed the new computer from the domain and deleted the smb.conf file. I then > > did: > > > > samba-tool domain join hprs.local DC --option='idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes' -U Administrator [deleted] > It sounds

Hello List, I am trying to compile and install Samba 4 using the wiki guide on Centos 6.2. I am currently using the current source from git. It seems that the zone file used for Bind is not configured and not installed in the private directory. Is there any way to get this file generated so I can finish my install? Thank you for your time and have a great day!! Kind regards, Jeremy

Hai, Since your getting. finddcs: No matching server found > ERROR: Invalid IP address '3(NXDOMAIN)'! There is something wrong in the base of you setup. Check all DC's for ipnumbers (A) and PTR records. Dont forget to create the reverse zone yourself. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_Troubleshooting

Hi Rowland Thanks for the link https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_Port_Usage It should fix the Firewall authentication problem. I like to find out if I can rename the Domain name of the DC when I move it to the new DC like currently it is IUMNET.EDU.NA <http://iumnet.edu.na/> but my GApps domain name is IUM.EDU.NA <http://ium.edu.na/> and I like to use the same on my new

Hi Team, Samba Version = 4.2 Bind = 9.10 with dlz Not able to to view replication.(samba-tool drs showrepl) [root at dc2]# samba-tool drs showrepl (want to highlight the name which is using to connect) ERROR(<class 'samba.drs_utils.drsException'>): DRS connection to *dc2.ik.lan.mum* failed - drsException: DRS connection to dc2.ik.lan.mum failed: (-1073741772, 'The

Il giorno mar 17 dic 2019 alle ore 17:49 Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> ha scritto: In the last year this has come up a few times, try reading this > > https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/817470/how-to-reconfigure-an-msdcs-subdomain-to-a-forest-wide-dns-application > It looks like we need a tool to correct AD :-( > Thanks! I will read that article. Do

First off, thanks to Rowland Penny for his patience in working through my thread "Joining a new Samba AD DC". I first attempted to upgrade my old Samba 4.8.2 AD/DC to a more recent version, but that effort failed due to too many differences with the Samba version and the latest Slackware OS version. Next I tried to join a 2nd Samba DC to the existing domain with the intent of promoting

Am 18.07.2018 um 14:17 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:49:39 +0200 > Anton Blau via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hmm, your REALM is 'SMBDOMAIN.FILE.DUCK' but your dnsdomain appears to > be just 'duck' > > Rowland > I read https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Active_Directory_Naming_FAQ - but I am not sure that my

Hai, ? i was reading: ? http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO#Testing_DNS? which stats : Don't use BIND9_FLATFILE! It's not documented and supported!? ? This is wrong imo.? ? bind9_flatefile works fine, it just does not support multi master dns, and bind9_DLZ does. so you must setup a master/slave setup for bind9 with flatfile ? If you need to run a network with

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:57 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 28/08/2019 19:49, Andy Strohman via samba wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm curious about this remark on the wiki[1] : > > "do NOT use NONE as the DNS backend, it is not supported and will be > > removed in a future Samba version." > > > >

Thanks a lot for your help so far. The main reason I do not use vms is that the server is pretty limited in RAM so this would only be my last resort. To prevent confusion: srv.wie (192.168.1.50) is the same machine as smb.wie (192.168.1.55), I seperated them just now to debug the problem. > These look like they are being run on the DC, what about from the > windows clients ? > I did

Can work if you use provisioning with BIND9_FLATFILE anyway i tested that long time ago.. but then you wil be missing the "Multimaster" dns ability. Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: donderdag 22 januari 2015 11:10 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org

yes i realized that there is something wrong with BIND9_FLATFILE while encountering with samba_upgradedns -h which doesn't show BIND9_FLATFILE Any help on*drs repl* not working i think it is pointing to wrong FQDN how do i correct that ? > >/ Not able to to view replication.(samba-tool drs showrepl) > />/ > />/ > />/ [root at dc2