similar to: Terraform ?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200000 matches similar to: "Terraform ?"

2018 May 02
1
unable to remove ACLs
On 01/05/18 23:59, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 5:46 AM, lejeczek > <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk <mailto:peljasz at yahoo.co.uk>> wrote: > > hi guys > > I have a simple case of: > $ setfacl -b > not working! > I copy a folder outside of autofs mounted gluster vol, > to a regular fs and removing acl works as
2018 May 01
2
unable to remove ACLs
hi guys I have a simple case of: $ setfacl -b not working! I copy a folder outside of autofs mounted gluster vol, to a regular fs and removing acl works as expected. Inside mounted gluster vol I seem to be able to modify/remove ACLs for users, groups and masks but that one simple, important thing does not work. It is also not the case of default ACLs being enforced from the parent, for I
2018 May 01
0
unable to remove ACLs
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 5:46 AM, lejeczek <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > hi guys > > I have a simple case of: > $ setfacl -b > not working! > I copy a folder outside of autofs mounted gluster vol, to a regular fs and > removing acl works as expected. > Inside mounted gluster vol I seem to be able to modify/remove ACLs for > users, groups and masks but that one
2023 Apr 19
2
bash test ?
On 19/04/2023 08:04, wwp wrote: > Hello lejeczek, > > > On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:50:29 +0200 lejeczek via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > >> Hi guys. >> >> I cannot wrap my hear around this: >> >> -> $ unset _Val; test -z ${_Val}; echo $? >> 0 >> -> $ unset _Val; test -n ${_Val}; echo $? >> 0 >> -> $
2018 Jan 03
1
@redhat - someone could take a look or ask about - freeipa-users@redhat.com
sorry guys to spam a bit - I hope someone from redhat could check whether - freeipa-users at redhat.com - is up & ok? I've been a subscriber for a couple of years but now, suddenly(?) I cannot mail there, I get: " Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address. <freeipa-users at redhat.com>: 554: 5.7.1 <freeipa-users at redhat.com>: Recipient
2017 Sep 01
2
peer rejected but connected
Logs from newly added node helped me in RCA of the issue. Info file on node 10.5.6.17 consist of an additional property "tier-enabled" which is not present in info file from other 3 nodes, hence when gluster peer probe call is made, in order to maintain consistency across the cluster cksum is compared. In this case as both files are different leading to different cksum, causing state in
2018 May 03
3
@devel - Why no inotify?
hi guys will we have gluster with inotify? some point / never? thanks, L.
2023 Jan 09
1
centos 8-Streams kernel?
On 1/7/23 13:41, Aleksandar Ivanisevic wrote: > Heh, > > Your sentiments on the website very much mirror my own, although I?m more focused on server applications rather than on desktop (we use Macs and Ubuntu for that). When Red Hat announced Streams, I was terrified at first and my first instinct was to switch to Rocky or a similar 1:1 distro, but then thought there might be something
2017 Sep 07
0
peer rejected but connected
Thank you for the acknowledgement. On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:39 PM, lejeczek <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > yes, I see things got lost in transit, I said before: > > I did from first time and now not rejected. > now I'm restarting fourth(newly added) peer's glusterd > and.. it seems to work. <- HERE! (even though.... > > and then I asked: >
2018 Aug 16
0
CentOS Digest, Vol 163, Issue 13
oh sorry On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 7:00 AM, <centos-request at centos.org> wrote: > Send CentOS mailing list submissions to > centos at centos.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > centos-request
2017 Aug 30
0
peer rejected but connected
Could you please send me "info" file which is placed in "/var/lib/glusterd/vols/<vol-name>" directory from all the nodes along with glusterd.logs and command-history. Thanks Gaurav On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 7:13 PM, lejeczek <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > hi fellas, > same old same > in log of the probing peer I see: > ... > 2017-08-29
2019 Dec 13
2
running R with users home dirs on a shared filesystems
Hi guys, I want to ask devel for who knows better - having multiple nodes serving users home dirs off the same shared network filesystem : are there any precautions or must-dos & must-donts in order to assure healthy and efficient parallel Rs running simultaneously - and I don't mean obvious stuff, I'm rather asking about R's internals & environment. simple example: three
2017 Sep 04
0
peer rejected but connected
Executing "gluster volume set all cluster.op-version <op-version>"on all the existing nodes will solve this problem. If issue still persists please provide me following logs (working-cluster + newly added peer) 1. glusterd.info file from /var/lib/glusterd from all nodes 2. glusterd.logs from all nodes 3. info file from all the nodes. 4. cmd-history from all the nodes. Thanks
2019 Aug 15
4
NT style domain users on Win10 cannot connect WIFI
hi guys, I realize it's not necessarily Samba type of a question but since this community here is vast with lots of win experience I thought I'd poke - same one winstation(ver. 1903) and computer's domain users when logged in can connect WIFI no problems, only Samba domain users cannot (to the same WIFIs). Anybody? many thanks, L.
2017 Aug 29
3
peer rejected but connected
hi fellas, same old same in log of the probing peer I see: ... 2017-08-29 13:36:16.882196] I [MSGID: 106493] [glusterd-handler.c:3020:__glusterd_handle_probe_query] 0-glusterd: Responded to priv.xx.xx.priv.xx.xx.x, op_ret: 0, op_errno: 0, ret: 0 [2017-08-29 13:36:16.904961] I [MSGID: 106490] [glusterd-handler.c:2606:__glusterd_handle_incoming_friend_req] 0-glusterd: Received probe from uuid:
2019 Jul 01
5
HPE ProLiant - support Linux Vendor Firmware Service ?
hi guys does anybody here runs on HPE ProLiant? I was hoping you can tell whether HPE support Linux Vendor Firmware Service and you actually get to upgrade ProLiants' BIOS/firmware via fwupdmgr? many thanks, L.
2018 Nov 20
7
kernel 3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64 + EFI on Dell server - problem
hi guys I've one box where I just yesterday upgraded Centos. I wonder if that kernel upgrade process might somewhat troublesome. After that upgrade UEFI boot fails with: Failed to set MokListRT: Invalid Parameter Something has gone seriously wrong: import_mok_state() failed : Invalid Parameter Has anybody seen that? And maybe know to fix it? many thanks, L.
2018 Oct 26
2
lvm vs qcow (on NVMe)
hi guys, anybody observed, maybe has measured performance difference between the two with qemu quests(windows OS)? Any conclusions, recommendations? many thanks, L.
2018 Dec 20
9
Fedora Server - as an alternative ?
hi guys I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than only contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in test/production envs. If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it to be a viable option to put it on at least portion of servers stack. Anybody? Many thanks, L.
2018 Dec 20
3
Fedora Server - as an alternative ?
On 20/12/2018 15:33, mark wrote: > lejeczek via CentOS wrote: >> hi guys >> >> I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than only >> contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in test/production >> envs. >> >> If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it to >> be a viable option to put it on