similar to: How will fragmentation help Red Hat

Somehow the text of my message got deleted: I'm still using CentOS 7 because both security and stability are important to me. While CentOS Stream may, or may not, have comparable security, it is severely lacking in stability. IMHO both CentOS 8 and CentOS 9 are gigantic piles of garbage. When the time comes that CentOS 7 no longer meets my needs, I'll be switching to some other distro,

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 6:13?AM Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch> wrote: > > Hi, > > As I found out yesterday, the fragmentation of the "Enterprise Linux" > ecosystem just started to come true. I expect this is only the beginning > and Red Hat may also start to completely hold back sources of non GPL > software which is part of the "Enterprise

Hi, As I found out yesterday, the fragmentation of the "Enterprise Linux" ecosystem just started to come true. I expect this is only the beginning and Red Hat may also start to completely hold back sources of non GPL software which is part of the "Enterprise Linux" ecosystem. I'm really wondering, how will this help anybody and how will this help Red Hat in the long run?

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 2:02 PM Josh Boyer <jwboyer at redhat.com> wrote: Ultimately, the Red Hat teams are using modularity where they believe > it makes sense and using regular packaging to reduce complexity for > customers where it doesn't provide much benefit. > Thanks for the explanation. For those who want to know more, here is the documentation I used when I was trying

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 3:18 PM Gionatan Danti <g.danti at assyoma.it> wrote: > > Il 2023-01-12 16:10 Josh Boyer ha scritto: > > Modules are one of several packaging formats we have. With CentOS > > Stream 9/ RHEL 9, we took user and customer feedback on how the > > default versions of software are packaged and determined that the > > defaults should be normal

Wayne.my vote is for a command-line option. I've noticed there is some penalty for very large files (35GB-50GB). The penalty is relatively small based on my 'intuitive' measurements.read me watching without running a real timer. The difference is very small compared to what happens after a few weeks without the fragmentation patch. Our SAN was becoming so fragmented that we were

I have been running a lot of large compression tests to see how well Martijn van Beurden's new presets do and was once again reminded how real the fragmentation problem still is. To have decent speed it's necessary to run multiple encoders in parallel. In my setup FLAC was compressing four files at the same time and each instance writes tiny bits of data to disk at once. A

Hi Timo, Any chance the mbox/mdbox writer code could be modified to do physical preallocation on files to help avoid file(system) fragmentation? Constantly appending a file is the prime recipe for causing fragmentation, and mbox is notorious for this--not a fault of Dovecot but the nature of the mbox beast. Obviously maildir doesn't have such a problem, but some (many?) of us still prefer

Hi, Em 07-04-2016 12:19, Volker escreveu: > Hi all. > > I have a strange problem at hand regarding UDP fragmentation on Centos7: > Applications are unable to receive UDP packets which have undergone > fragmentation UNLESS the netfilter modules are loaded. > > The problem arose on a application which would run fine on OpenSuse but > does not work on Centos7. The application

Em 10-04-2016 14:25, Volker escreveu: > On 09.04.2016 21:40, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Em 07-04-2016 12:19, Volker escreveu: >>> Hi all. >>> >>> I have a strange problem at hand regarding UDP fragmentation on Centos7: >>> Applications are unable to receive UDP packets which have undergone >>> fragmentation UNLESS

I've been running some tests on files created by rsync and noticing fragmentation issues. I started the testing because our 5TB array started performing very slowly and it appears fragmentation was the culprit. The test I conducted was straighforward: 1. Copy over a 49GB file. Analyzed with contig (from sysinternals), no fragments. 2. Ran rsync and the file was recreated normally (rsync

Hello Marc, I'm referring to divide/fragment de Database AD (if possible). Trying to store a set of Data in a DC and another set of data in other DC... something like this. I ask that, because I've been asked for a strategy or mechanism related to the scalability which based on the horizontal fragmentation of AD. Then, Does AD have some type of mechanism for supporting the horizontal

Il 2023-01-12 16:10 Josh Boyer ha scritto: > Modules are one of several packaging formats we have. With CentOS > Stream 9/ RHEL 9, we took user and customer feedback on how the > default versions of software are packaged and determined that the > defaults should be normal RPMs. Newer and alternative versions of > software will be delivered as modules in some cases, or as regular

Let me preface this by saying "Yes, I know *nix filesystems don't need to worry about fragmentation". That said, is there a way to check the overall level of fragmentation of a live ext3 filesystem? I know about filefrag, but that's for specific files. And I think e2fsck tells you, but only if you take the filesystem offline for the scan. Is there anything that will give

Am 15.06.2016 um 22:05 schrieb Felipe_G0NZÁLEZ_SANTIAG0: > I'm referring to divide/fragment de Database AD (if possible). > Trying to store a set of Data in a DC and another set > of data in other DC... something like this. I ask that, > because I've been asked for a strategy or mechanism > related to the scalability which based on the > horizontal fragmentation of AD.

Hello All, I have few questions around our use of ocfs1/2 for archive logs on 10G RAC. Is there an article out there describing why fragmentation is a special concern for ocfs1/2? Are there ways to remove fragmentation short of rebuilding the fs? Is there a way to estimate how often we will need to rebuild the fs? Any special tools/packages available to handle this issue? Regards, Pradeep.

On 09.04.2016 21:40, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > Hi, > > Em 07-04-2016 12:19, Volker escreveu: >> Hi all. >> >> I have a strange problem at hand regarding UDP fragmentation on Centos7: >> Applications are unable to receive UDP packets which have undergone >> fragmentation UNLESS the netfilter modules are loaded. >> >> The problem arose on a

On 04/07/2016 08:19 AM, Volker wrote: > I have a strange problem at hand regarding UDP fragmentation on Centos7: > Applications are unable to receive UDP packets which have undergone > fragmentation UNLESS the netfilter modules are loaded. ... > The application in question uses Qt, which opens the UDP socket in > non-blocking mode - apparently that's an issue because reading

This post appeared on another forum: Will CentOS become obsolete now because of the changes Red Hat is implementing? Red Hat has changed the way it distributes Enterprise Linux kernel code in an effort to prevent Oracle and Novell from stealing its customers, making it more difficult for these competitors to understand which patches have been applied where. Some have speculated that the change

I have a huge problem with ZFS pool fragmentation. I started investigating problem about 2 weeks ago http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=34423&tstart=0 I found workaround for now - changing recordsize - but I want better solution. The best solution would be a defragmentator tool, but I can see that it is not easy. When ZFS pool is fragmented then: 1. spa_sync function is