similar to: Adding SRV records to zone

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Adding SRV records to zone"

2023 Jul 21
1
Adding SRV records to zone
Hi Sagar, Are you getting a particular error? Because the same method should work just fine in NSD. Simply open the corresponding zone file (as configured in nsd.conf) and put that line in there. Best regards, Jeroen Koekkoek On Fri, 2023-07-21 at 09:14 +0200, Sagar Acharya via nsd-users wrote: > How do I add SRV record to my zone file? > > Eg. In pdns I have > >
2023 Jul 21
1
Adding SRV records to zone
I'm asking that what is the proper method to add SRV records. I read the documentation but I couldn't find anything around it. If you can perhaps add something which specifies how each and every type of record is to be written on documentation, that would be very useful. Thanking you Sagar Acharya https://humaaraartha.in 21 Jul 2023, 18:46 by jeroen at nlnetlabs.nl: > Hi Sagar,
2023 Sep 08
1
Adding PTR records
What is the right way to add PTR records to zonefile? I have the following config. Is it syntactically correct? humaaraartha.in.? ? ? ?A? ? ? ? ?182.59.136.243 243.136.59.182.in-addr.arpa.? ? ? PTR? ? ? ?humaaraartha.in.? When I dig the latter @localhost, I'm unable to get humaaraartha.in.? Thanking you Sagar Acharya https://humaaraartha.in P.S. Kindly cc me, I'm not subscribed to the
2024 Oct 16
1
SIGSEGV in rbtree_find_less_equal
Hi Chris, I've properly started looking into this yesterday. NSD definitely shouldn't crash, still working on that. However, the provided zone is invalid too(?) I'm not the foremost expert on NSEC3 (or even DNSSEC), but is seems an NSEC3 is missing for bar.foo.com. Empty non-terminals should still have an NSEC3 RR. (Of course, the delegation point should be at bar.foo.com. too and
2024 Oct 09
1
SIGSEGV in rbtree_find_less_equal
Hi Chris, I can reproduce with your zone. Thanks! Best, Jeroen On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 14:07 +0000, Chris LaVallee wrote: > > Hi Jeroen, > > > Attached is the zone I used. Did you add the record for a.bar ? > > > Ex: > > > a.bar ? 300 ? ? IN ?NS ? ? ?ns.somewhere.net. > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > >
2024 Jul 24
2
NSD 4.10.1rc2 pre-release
Am 23.07.24 um 17:28 schrieb Jeroen Koekkoek via nsd-users: > NSD 4.10.1rc2 pre-release is available: no compile time warnings while building on debian bookworm/x86_64 > @bilias implemented mutual TLS authentication for zone transfers. > Please consult the nsd.conf manual for details on the newly introduced > configuration options tls-auth-port and tls-auth-xfr-only. this is an nice
2024 Feb 28
1
About timestamps in logs and zonestatus
Hi Jeroen, I just realised that the version I use is very old -- 4.1. So first what I should do -- updating it and only then come here , asking for clarification. ??, 27 ????. 2024??. ? 14:19, Jeroen Koekkoek <jeroen at nlnetlabs.nl>: > Hi Peter, > > NSD processes updates in batches. xfrd receives the [AI]XFR and > schedules a reload for the main process, which in turn forks
2024 Oct 08
1
SIGSEGV in rbtree_find_less_equal
Hi Jeroen, Attached is the zone I used. Did you add the record for a.bar ? Ex: a.bar 300 IN NS ns.somewhere.net. Chris ________________________________ From: Jeroen Koekkoek <jeroen at nlnetlabs.nl> Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 5:33 AM To: Chris LaVallee <clavallee at edg.io>; nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> Subject: Re:
2024 Jul 17
1
Run-time effects of new SIMD code
On 17/07/2024 16:57, Jeroen Koekkoek wrote: Hi Jeroen, > That is indeed correct. At runtime the CPUID instruction is used to > detect which extensions are offered and it chooses based on that. When > compiling on x86_64 with SSE4.2 and AVX2 enabled, the binary will > actually contain 3 parsers, the most optimal one is used at runtime. Thanks for this clarification. NSD doesn't
2024 Apr 25
3
NSD 4.10.0rc1 pre-release
NSD 4.10.0rc1 is available: https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.10.0rc1.tar.gz sha256 ad476e82eee5bdabc985e071cabe6a68263dd02eac6278ce2f81798b8c08f19f pgp https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.10.0rc1.tar.gz.asc Version 4.10.0 integrates simdzone and drops the Flex+Bison zone parser. NSD used a Flex+Bison based zone parser since version 1.4.0. The parser served NSD well, but zones have
2023 Dec 07
2
Question on slave
Jeroen Koekkoek via nsd-users <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> wrote: > Anand's answer is entirely correct. > > Once 4.8.0 is released, zone files will be written once per hour by > default. I'm confused now :-) Arnand said the "database" option is being removed. Does this mean the database will always be created, or NEVER be created? I always wondered why
2023 Apr 24
1
nsd issue
Hi Jean Claude, The message is printed when the bind operation failed. Why that happens is hard to say, I'd need more information for that. As the message does not say: address already in use (or similar), I'm guessing the address is not configured? Best regards, Jeroen On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 18:03 +0200, HAKIZIMANA Jean Claude via nsd-users wrote: > Dear nsd Users, > kindly can
2024 Feb 27
1
About timestamps in logs and zonestatus
Hi Peter, NSD processes updates in batches. xfrd receives the [AI]XFR and schedules a reload for the main process, which in turn forks new serve children. The served-serial is updated after main reports success, the commit-serial (update written to disk) is updated before the reload (to explain the serials). The difference in timestamp can be explained by the fact that NSD looks up if the serial
2024 Oct 08
1
SIGSEGV in rbtree_find_less_equal
Hi Chris, I'm having trouble trying to reproduce the issue locally. Like you I configure two zones. zone: name: example.com. zonefile: example.com.zone.signed zone: name: bar.example.com. zonefile: bar.example.com.zone The file bar.example.com.zone does not exist. After touching and reloading the signed zone, no segfault occurs. I've tried with and without the
2023 Dec 05
1
Question on slave
Hi Jean-Christophe, Anand's answer is entirely correct. Once 4.8.0 is released, zone files will be written once per hour by default. Best regards, Jeroen On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 10:48 +0100, Anand Buddhdev via nsd-users wrote: > On 04/12/2023 13:47, Jean-Christophe Boggio via nsd-users wrote: > > Hi Jean-Christophe, > > > When syncing between master and slaves, am I
2024 Jul 17
1
Run-time effects of new SIMD code
Hi Anand, Stuart, That is indeed correct. At runtime the CPUID instruction is used to detect which extensions are offered and it chooses based on that. When compiling on x86_64 with SSE4.2 and AVX2 enabled, the binary will actually contain 3 parsers, the most optimal one is used at runtime. Optimized versions can be disabled with --disable-westmere (SSE4.2) and --disable-haswell (AVX2) if
2024 Jul 23
1
NSD 4.10.1rc2 pre-release
Hi, NSD 4.10.1rc2 pre-release is available: https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.10.1rc2.tar.gz sha256 ce2e82bc673aeff3a71aeb422fa38fb8db0a591edb76c13b0e4dde83ec8253e9 pgp https://nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/nsd-4.10.1rc2.tar.gz.asc Version 4.10.1 consists primarily of bug fixes. @bilias implemented mutual TLS authentication for zone transfers. Please consult the nsd.conf manual for details
2009 Aug 24
8
overriding .blank? method
Hi, Does anyone know a way to override .blank? method that rails provides. I want to add additional custom checks (specific to my application) to this method. Thanks, Pratik
2009 Sep 17
3
Help with date specification
Hi everyone,I have a data daily data (x) for 10 years starting from 04-01-1995 to 03-31-2005. I was able to get the yearly sum for the ten years using aggregate(x, years, sum). But this gave me the yearly sum for 1995 (Apr- Dec); 1996 (Jan-Dec) ---------2005 (Jan-Mar). But I want to get the aggregates for Apr-1995 to Mar 1996, Apr 1996- mar 1997 and so on. your help will be higly appreciated.
2014 Nov 12
3
Put virbr0 in promiscusous
Hi , I have two virtual machines VM1 and VM2. Then I have added eth0 of my VM to 'default' network. Use case :- I want to monitor all traffic on virbr0('default' network). Steps followed :- 1. Add VM1 eth0 to virbr0 2. Add VM2 eth1 to virbr0 3. brctl setageing ovsbr0 0 ..(To put bridge in promiscuous) Now I am running tcpdump on eth1 of VM2 and trying to ping