similar to: ZFS filesystem online backup question

We have an ubuntu 14.04 server running samba 4.1.6 that is a member of our OLDDOMAIN. We recently added a new trusted domain to our forest. We noticed any new directories created by users in that new domain take a long time for the directory to list in the command line. This does not seem to happen when listing the directories with only user/group ID: root at

Hello, I need to regress data like the example below. The data points represent friction factors derived from observed trip length data. The function used to describe this data is a gamma function of the form, f(t) = a * t^b * e^(c*t) and I need to regress the data to obtain the a,b, and c coefficients. The gamma function can also be expressed in the log-linear form, ln[f(t)] = ln[a] + b

This may not be a ZFS issue, so please bear with me! I have 4 internal drives that I have striped/mirrored with ZFS and have an application server which is reading/writing to hundreds of thousands of files on it, thousands of files @ a time. If 1 client uses the app server, the transaction (reading/writing to ~80 files) takes about 200 ms. If I have about 80 clients attempting it @ once, it can

Hello ZFS, System was rebooted and after reboot server again System is snv_39, SPARC, T2000 bash-3.00# ptree 7 /lib/svc/bin/svc.startd -s 163 /sbin/sh /lib/svc/method/fs-local 254 /usr/sbin/zfs mount -a [...] bash-3.00# zfs list|wc -l 46 Using df I can see most file systems are already mounted. > ::ps!grep zfs R 254 163 7 7 0 0x4a004000

Dear R users, I have noticed that my R startup is extremely slow. It takes almost 3 minutes from "double-click" to R prompt. I have been running R-0.64.1 till recently and it took about 30 sec. I still have access to R-0.64.1. When I started it up, it took about 25 sec. Can anyone tell me if this is a bug in R or a problem with my machine? Note: This is after bootup with R being the

This is a simple patch which stops nbd_close from waiting too long for a server subprocess to shut down. I wanted to send SIGHUP because the server will be able to catch it and do a clean shutdown if that is required. Is another signal better? Is it right to send a signal here? Rich.

Hi yes, I'm asking for any advice, I want to implement multithreaded code generator in LLVM. tnx --- On Tue, 10/5/10, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: From: Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Multithreaded code generation To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Date: Tuesday, October 5, 2010, 10:50 AM Hi Hamed, > I want to use LLVM to automatically

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek < kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 4/17/2013 12:15 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > >> >> Give a compelling argument and I might :) >> > > The cost is the extra time spent verifying that the binaries are fresh. > In my experience it has never happened that I ran "make check" on a wrong >

Hi, I am currently running a 10 Node OCFS2 Cluster (version 1.3.9-0ubuntu1) on Ubuntu Server 8.04 x86_64. Linux n1 2.6.24-24-server #1 SMP Tue Jul 7 19:39:36 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux The Cluster is connected to a 1Tera iSCSI Device presented by an IBM 3300 Storage System, running over a 1Gig Network. Mounted on all nodes: /dev/sdc1 on /cfs1 type ocfs2

On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:43 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 4/17/2013 12:15 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > Give a compelling argument and I might :) > > The cost is the extra time spent verifying that the binaries are fresh. In my

On 10/05/2010 09:42 AM, hamed hamzehi wrote: > Hi > yes, I'm asking for any advice, I want to implement multithreaded code > generator in LLVM. > tnx Hi, this generally depends which kind of code you want to multithread, because generally this is a difficult problem. However, if you limit yourself for the moment to loops that fit into the polyhedral model, you can take

On 4/17/2013 12:15 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > Give a compelling argument and I might :) The cost is the extra time spent verifying that the binaries are fresh. In my experience it has never happened that I ran "make check" on a wrong set of binaries. On the other hand, it does happen that I run "make check" repeatedly, when working on a testcase (or a set of

On Nov 14, 2009, at 11:52 PM, Prasanth J wrote: > step 4: > running monolith.bc for 10000 iterations using lli tool and measured the time. How are you doing this? -eric

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 4/17/2013 11:50 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: >> >> Because almost no other piece of software out there doesn't have >> 'check' depend on rebuilding the target it's testing and it's bitten >> people whereas other than the lameness of our build system

Le lun. 19 ao?t 2019 ? 11:01, L.P.H. van Belle via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > > Hai, > > Fist of all, i must say it not very wise to have you NFS server on the AD-DC. > > I do about the same but my NFS server is on a member. > > Have you configured /etc/nsswitch.conf ? > If not do that. > > If you run : id username > I see :

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 6:30 PM, ?? <chenxi at shudun.com> wrote: > Using the host name of the volume, its related gluster commands can become > very slow .For example,create,start,stop volume,nfs related commands. and > some time And in some cases, the command will return Error : Request timed > out > but If using ip address to create the volume. The volume all gluster >

Hi. I use winbind + squid on Debian Buster to authenticate users + authorize them based on groups they are in. It all works, well, good, but winbind's CPU utilization peaks can reach up to 100%. The same solution ran OK on Debian Jessie with up to 20% CPU utilization at most. The configuration of Buster must have been updated based on the samba version leap/shift compared to Jessie. On

Hello Everyone, I am trying to excess the inbuit .Fortran and .C codes of R. Can any one help me in that. For example in kmeans clustering the algorithms are written in .Fortran I want to access them and see the .Fortran syntax of the codes. Can any one help me how can I do that? Thanx, Nitin Kumar On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:00 PM, <r-help-request@r-project.org> wrote: > Send R-help

Using the host name of the volume, its related gluster commands can become very slow .For example,create,start,stop volume,nfs related commands. and some time And in some cases, the command will return Error : Request timed out but If using ip address to create the volume. The volume all gluster commands are normal. I have configured /etc/hosts correctly,Because,SSH can normally use the

Hi all, LLVM is built without debug enabled. Also i am not forcing lli to use interpreter mode. so i dont think the reason is not because of debug build or interpreter mode. *step 1: * compiled the 3 files (generic_replica.c ,xacc.c and dacc.c) with clang-cc to llvm bytecode files using -emit-llvm-bc and (-O0/-O3) options *step 2:* bytecode obtained from step 1 (generic_replica.bc, xacc.bc and