similar to: [PATCH net-next V1 0/4] virtio_net: add per queue interrupt coalescing support

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "[PATCH net-next V1 0/4] virtio_net: add per queue interrupt coalescing support"

2023 Jul 14
1
[PATCH net-next V1 0/4] virtio_net: add per queue interrupt coalescing support
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 07:40:12 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:20:01PM +0300, Gavin Li wrote: > > Currently, coalescing parameters are grouped for all transmit and receive > > virtqueues. This patch series add support to set or get the parameters for > > a specified virtqueue. > > > > When the
2023 Mar 05
1
[PATCH net] virtio-net: unify notifications coalescing structs
Unify virtio_net_ctrl_coal_tx and virtio_net_ctrl_coal_rx structs into a single struct, virtio_net_ctrl_coal, as they are identical. This patch follows the VirtIO spec patch: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202302/msg00431.html Signed-off-by: Alvaro Karsz <alvaro.karsz at solid-run.com> --- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 15 +++++++--------
2023 Mar 06
1
[PATCH net] virtio-net: unify notifications coalescing structs
On Sun, Mar 5, 2023 at 11:49?PM Alvaro Karsz <alvaro.karsz at solid-run.com> wrote: > > Unify virtio_net_ctrl_coal_tx and virtio_net_ctrl_coal_rx structs into a > single struct, virtio_net_ctrl_coal, as they are identical. > > This patch follows the VirtIO spec patch: > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202302/msg00431.html > > Signed-off-by: Alvaro
2014 Dec 02
4
[PATCH RFC v4 net-next 0/5] virtio_net: enabling tx interrupts
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:17:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> Hello: >> >> We used to orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. This >> breaks >> socket accounting and can lead serveral functions won't work, e.g: >> >> - Byte Queue Limit depends
2014 Dec 02
4
[PATCH RFC v4 net-next 0/5] virtio_net: enabling tx interrupts
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:17:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> Hello: >> >> We used to orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. This >> breaks >> socket accounting and can lead serveral functions won't work, e.g: >> >> - Byte Queue Limit depends
2015 Feb 13
4
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 4/6] virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:02:37PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: >> Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes: >> > This patch enables the interrupt coalescing setting through ethtool. >> >> The problem is that there's nothing network specific about interrupt >> coalescing. I can see
2015 Feb 13
4
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 4/6] virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:02:37PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: >> Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes: >> > This patch enables the interrupt coalescing setting through ethtool. >> >> The problem is that there's nothing network specific about interrupt >> coalescing. I can see
2007 Dec 17
2
[LLVMdev] Question about coalescing
Dear Dave, Evan, thank you for answering. What I did was to remove the implementation of most of the methods of SimpleRegisterCoalescing and put them in a single class (RegisterCoalescer_Impl) that is not an analysis. Any class that wants these methods, can extend this class privately, or can use a reference to an RegisterCoalescer_Impl object. I wish it would be possible to go even
2010 Nov 18
1
[LLVMdev] subregs in trivial coalescing
I'm running into a problem with subregs during trivial coalescing in the linear scan allocator. Should RALinScan::attemptTrivialCoalescing be allowed to coalesce a COPY that uses a subreg as a destination? I've got the following sequence of code (unfortunately for an out of tree target) that is moving 32 and 64 bit sub-registers around within a 128 bit register. By the time the register
2010 Oct 03
1
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Coalescing Registers
I want to full understand register coalescing and how to coalesce copies. From what I have seen from "SimpleRegisterCoalescing," "RegAllocLinearSpan," and "RegAllocPBQP" there are three indicators for the copy instruction x = copy y. Assume that the value number of x does not equal the value number of y. For "x = copy y", let the boolean values a,b, and c,
2015 Feb 10
4
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 4/6] virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes: > This patch enables the interrupt coalescing setting through ethtool. The problem is that there's nothing network specific about interrupt coalescing. I can see other devices wanting exactly the same thing, which means we'd deprecate this in the next virtio standard. I think the right answer is to extend like we did with
2015 Feb 10
4
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 4/6] virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes: > This patch enables the interrupt coalescing setting through ethtool. The problem is that there's nothing network specific about interrupt coalescing. I can see other devices wanting exactly the same thing, which means we'd deprecate this in the next virtio standard. I think the right answer is to extend like we did with
2007 Dec 16
3
[LLVMdev] Question about coalescing
Dear guys, I want to coalesce some copies, and I would like to know if there is any method that I can call, like JoinCopy from the old (LLVM 1.9) LiveIntervals class. I found it in SimpleRegisterCoalescing (LLVM 2.1), but I do not want to call this analysis, as I have my own. basically, I can determine that two virtuals do not overlap, and I know that it is safe to join them. In
2007 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] Question about coalescing
On Monday 17 December 2007 14:06, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira wrote: > Dear Dave, Evan, thank you for answering. > > What I did was to remove the implementation of most of the methods of > SimpleRegisterCoalescing and put them in a single class > (RegisterCoalescer_Impl) that is not an analysis. Any class that wants > these methods, can extend this class privately, or can
2007 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] Question about coalescing
On Dec 15, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira wrote: > > Dear guys, > > I want to coalesce some copies, and I would like to know if > there is > any method that I can call, like JoinCopy from the old (LLVM 1.9) > LiveIntervals class. I found it in SimpleRegisterCoalescing (LLVM > 2.1), > but I do not want to call this analysis, as I have my own.
2004 Feb 25
1
Wan Simulation / Bw/Latency testing
Hi, i have a question if linux is able to do the same thing that commercial wan simulators do (which cost 7000 $ or more). Basicly i want to use the following setup. Linux Router Machine 192.168.0.1 192.168.1.1 Eth0 192.168.10.1 Eth5 192.168.2.1 Eth1 192.168.100.1 WEB Server. 192.168.3.1 Eth2
2014 Dec 01
9
[PATCH RFC v4 net-next 0/5] virtio_net: enabling tx interrupts
Hello: We used to orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. This breaks socket accounting and can lead serveral functions won't work, e.g: - Byte Queue Limit depends on tx completion nofication to work. - Packet Generator depends on tx completion nofication for the last transmitted packet to complete. - TCP Small Queue depends on proper accounting of sk_wmem_alloc to work. This
2014 Dec 01
9
[PATCH RFC v4 net-next 0/5] virtio_net: enabling tx interrupts
Hello: We used to orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. This breaks socket accounting and can lead serveral functions won't work, e.g: - Byte Queue Limit depends on tx completion nofication to work. - Packet Generator depends on tx completion nofication for the last transmitted packet to complete. - TCP Small Queue depends on proper accounting of sk_wmem_alloc to work. This
2014 Dec 02
2
[PATCH RFC v4 net-next 0/5] virtio_net: enabling tx interrupts
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 08:15:02AM +0008, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > >On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:17:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >>> Hello: > >>> We used to
2014 Dec 02
2
[PATCH RFC v4 net-next 0/5] virtio_net: enabling tx interrupts
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 08:15:02AM +0008, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > >On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:17:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >>> Hello: > >>> We used to