Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "[PATCH net-next V1 0/4] virtio_net: add per queue interrupt coalescing support"
2023 Jul 14
1
[PATCH net-next V1 0/4] virtio_net: add per queue interrupt coalescing support
On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 07:40:12 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:20:01PM +0300, Gavin Li wrote:
> > Currently, coalescing parameters are grouped for all transmit and receive
> > virtqueues. This patch series add support to set or get the parameters for
> > a specified virtqueue.
> >
> > When the
2023 Mar 05
1
[PATCH net] virtio-net: unify notifications coalescing structs
Unify virtio_net_ctrl_coal_tx and virtio_net_ctrl_coal_rx structs into a
single struct, virtio_net_ctrl_coal, as they are identical.
This patch follows the VirtIO spec patch:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202302/msg00431.html
Signed-off-by: Alvaro Karsz <alvaro.karsz at solid-run.com>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 15 +++++++--------
2023 Mar 06
1
[PATCH net] virtio-net: unify notifications coalescing structs
On Sun, Mar 5, 2023 at 11:49?PM Alvaro Karsz <alvaro.karsz at solid-run.com> wrote:
>
> Unify virtio_net_ctrl_coal_tx and virtio_net_ctrl_coal_rx structs into a
> single struct, virtio_net_ctrl_coal, as they are identical.
>
> This patch follows the VirtIO spec patch:
> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202302/msg00431.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Alvaro
2014 Dec 02
4
[PATCH RFC v4 net-next 0/5] virtio_net: enabling tx interrupts
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:17:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> Hello:
>>
>> We used to orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. This
>> breaks
>> socket accounting and can lead serveral functions won't work, e.g:
>>
>> - Byte Queue Limit depends
2014 Dec 02
4
[PATCH RFC v4 net-next 0/5] virtio_net: enabling tx interrupts
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:17:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> Hello:
>>
>> We used to orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. This
>> breaks
>> socket accounting and can lead serveral functions won't work, e.g:
>>
>> - Byte Queue Limit depends
2015 Feb 13
4
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 4/6] virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:02:37PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes:
>> > This patch enables the interrupt coalescing setting through ethtool.
>>
>> The problem is that there's nothing network specific about interrupt
>> coalescing. I can see
2015 Feb 13
4
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 4/6] virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:02:37PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes:
>> > This patch enables the interrupt coalescing setting through ethtool.
>>
>> The problem is that there's nothing network specific about interrupt
>> coalescing. I can see
2007 Dec 17
2
[LLVMdev] Question about coalescing
Dear Dave, Evan, thank you for answering.
What I did was to remove the implementation of most of the methods of
SimpleRegisterCoalescing and put them in a single class
(RegisterCoalescer_Impl) that is not an analysis. Any class that wants
these methods, can extend this class privately, or can use a reference to
an RegisterCoalescer_Impl object. I wish it would be possible to go even
2010 Nov 18
1
[LLVMdev] subregs in trivial coalescing
I'm running into a problem with subregs during trivial coalescing in the
linear scan allocator.
Should RALinScan::attemptTrivialCoalescing be allowed to coalesce a COPY
that uses a subreg as a destination?
I've got the following sequence of code (unfortunately for an out of tree
target) that is moving 32 and 64 bit sub-registers around within a 128 bit
register. By the time the register
2010 Oct 03
1
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Coalescing Registers
I want to full understand register coalescing and how to coalesce
copies. From what I have seen from "SimpleRegisterCoalescing,"
"RegAllocLinearSpan," and "RegAllocPBQP" there are three indicators
for the copy instruction x = copy y. Assume that the value number of x
does not equal the value number of y.
For "x = copy y", let the boolean values a,b, and c,
2015 Feb 10
4
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 4/6] virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes:
> This patch enables the interrupt coalescing setting through ethtool.
The problem is that there's nothing network specific about interrupt
coalescing. I can see other devices wanting exactly the same thing,
which means we'd deprecate this in the next virtio standard.
I think the right answer is to extend like we did with
2015 Feb 10
4
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 4/6] virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes:
> This patch enables the interrupt coalescing setting through ethtool.
The problem is that there's nothing network specific about interrupt
coalescing. I can see other devices wanting exactly the same thing,
which means we'd deprecate this in the next virtio standard.
I think the right answer is to extend like we did with
2007 Dec 16
3
[LLVMdev] Question about coalescing
Dear guys,
I want to coalesce some copies, and I would like to know if there is
any method that I can call, like JoinCopy from the old (LLVM 1.9)
LiveIntervals class. I found it in SimpleRegisterCoalescing (LLVM 2.1),
but I do not want to call this analysis, as I have my own.
basically, I can determine that two virtuals do not overlap, and I
know that it is safe to join them. In
2007 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] Question about coalescing
On Monday 17 December 2007 14:06, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira wrote:
> Dear Dave, Evan, thank you for answering.
>
> What I did was to remove the implementation of most of the methods of
> SimpleRegisterCoalescing and put them in a single class
> (RegisterCoalescer_Impl) that is not an analysis. Any class that wants
> these methods, can extend this class privately, or can
2007 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] Question about coalescing
On Dec 15, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira wrote:
>
> Dear guys,
>
> I want to coalesce some copies, and I would like to know if
> there is
> any method that I can call, like JoinCopy from the old (LLVM 1.9)
> LiveIntervals class. I found it in SimpleRegisterCoalescing (LLVM
> 2.1),
> but I do not want to call this analysis, as I have my own.
2004 Feb 25
1
Wan Simulation / Bw/Latency testing
Hi, i have a question if linux is able to do the same thing that
commercial wan simulators do (which cost 7000 $ or more).
Basicly i want to use the following setup.
Linux Router Machine
192.168.0.1 192.168.1.1 Eth0 192.168.10.1 Eth5
192.168.2.1 Eth1 192.168.100.1 WEB Server.
192.168.3.1 Eth2
2014 Dec 01
9
[PATCH RFC v4 net-next 0/5] virtio_net: enabling tx interrupts
Hello:
We used to orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. This breaks
socket accounting and can lead serveral functions won't work, e.g:
- Byte Queue Limit depends on tx completion nofication to work.
- Packet Generator depends on tx completion nofication for the last
transmitted packet to complete.
- TCP Small Queue depends on proper accounting of sk_wmem_alloc to work.
This
2014 Dec 01
9
[PATCH RFC v4 net-next 0/5] virtio_net: enabling tx interrupts
Hello:
We used to orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. This breaks
socket accounting and can lead serveral functions won't work, e.g:
- Byte Queue Limit depends on tx completion nofication to work.
- Packet Generator depends on tx completion nofication for the last
transmitted packet to complete.
- TCP Small Queue depends on proper accounting of sk_wmem_alloc to work.
This
2014 Dec 02
2
[PATCH RFC v4 net-next 0/5] virtio_net: enabling tx interrupts
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 08:15:02AM +0008, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:17:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>> Hello:
> >>> We used to
2014 Dec 02
2
[PATCH RFC v4 net-next 0/5] virtio_net: enabling tx interrupts
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 08:15:02AM +0008, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:17:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>> Hello:
> >>> We used to