similar to: [Bug 1672] add local DNSSEC validation

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1672 Summary: add local DNSSEC validation Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.3p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: robert.story

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1672 --- Comment #8 from pva <peter.volkov at gmail.com> --- What is the status of this patch? It looks like many people don't realize that without a secure local resolver, SSHFP just hides security under the carpet: instead of a clear one-time 'yes' it makes this 'yes' unattended, yet it's still possible for mitm on local

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2119 Bug ID: 2119 Summary: SSHFP with DNSSEC ? no trust anchors given, validation always fails Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.2p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Set all RESOLVED bugs to CLOSED with release

Attached is a patch that adds local DNSSEC validation to OpenSSH. See the readme for more detail. Please direct any questions or comments to users at dnssec-tools.org. Thanks.. -- Robert Story Senior Software Engineer SPARTA (dba Cobham Analytic Soloutions) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size:

Hi, I submitted a patch back in November of 2009 to add local validation of DNSSEC record to openssh. I recent updated the patch for 5.8, and figured I do a little marketing while I'm at it. :-) Someone had previously submitted a patch which simply trusted the AD bit in the response, which is susceptible to spoofing by anyone who can inject packets between the resolver and the client. Our

Hi, I found a small issue with DNSSEC validation of SSHFP lookups. (For reference I used OpenSSH 6.8p1 on FreeBSD 10.1). The issues is that when DNSSEC valiation fails, ssh displays a confusing message to the user. When DNSSEC validation of a SSHFP record fails, ssh presents the user with "Matching host key fingerprint found in DNS. "Are you sure you want to continue connecting

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2516 Bug ID: 2516 Summary: ssh client shouldn't trust the DNS AD bit blindly Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: security Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1860 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Damien Miller <djm at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1296 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1970 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME CC| |djm at mindrot.org Status|NEW

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1592 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org --- Comment #1 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Can you reproduce this with a

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022 Bug #: 2022 Summary: ssh segfaults when using ldns, SSHFP, a DNSSEC-enabled resolver and a CNAME Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.0p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749 Bug ID: 3749 Summary: RELEASE_KEY.asc at https://www.openssh.com/portable.html is expired Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.9p1 Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Set all RESOLVED bugs to CLOSED with release

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1970 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Close all resolved bugs after 7.3p1 release

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1592 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Damien Miller <djm at

But the main question hasn't been answered: Why is /usr/local placed before user-specified paths? Hypothetical example: You want to link against OpenSSL 0.96 for OpenSSH, but /usr/local contains 0.95, which is needed for something else. (Assume it comes binary only on Solaris for the sake of argument...) --Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: Damien Miller [mailto:djm at

I am taking the liberty of forwarding this message to the list. I am not subscribed to it. If you want to reply to me, please send email to faheem at email.unc.edu Thanks, Faheem Mitha. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Faheem Mitha <faheem at email.unc.edu> Newsgroups: comp.security.ssh Subject: installing OpenSSH rpm on SuSE 6.2 Dear people, I tried