similar to: LZO compression?

Hi, I just installed 2009.06 and found that compression isn''t enabled by default when filesystems are created. Does is make sense to have an RFE open for this? (I''ll open one tonight if need be.) We keep telling people to turn on compression. Are there any situations where turning on compression doesn''t make sense, like rpool/swap? what about rpool/dump? Thanks, ~~sa

Hi Some developers here said a long time ago that someone should show the code for LZO compression support for ZFS before talking about the next step. I made that code with a friend and we also made a little benchmark to give a first impression: http://denisy.dyndns.org/lzo_vs_lzjb/ I hope we made no technical error, but if you find something not accurate, we will correct it. Denis -- This

Hello, I downloaded tinc 1.0.9 from the site and tried to build on Fedora 10 on i386 (and also x86_64). I get, during the configure phase: checking for zlib.h... yes checking for compress2 in -lz... yes checking for lzo1x_1_compress in -llzo2... no checking for lzo1x_1_compress in -llzo... no configure: error: "lzo libraries not found." but: # rpm -qi lzo Name : lzo

Bellow, follows a proposal for a new opensolaris project. Of course, this is open to change since I just wrote down some ideas I had months ago, while researching the topic as a graduate student in Computer Science, and since I''m not an opensolaris/ZFS expert at all. I would really appreciate any suggestion or comments. PROJECT PROPOSAL: ZFS Compression Algorithms. The main purpose of

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0861 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0861.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 5573a762c075a0d03f070c6bd0b47c41311fff66e21e034863d514ee65d8c081 lzo-2.03-3.1.el6_5.1.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0861 Moderate Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014:0861 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 898c40521dfa677aa2217a083a9f382618b359d7a1a0361167427123f3397632 lzo-2.06-6.el7_0.2.i686.rpm

What does it mean for the reported value of a zvol volsize to be less than the product of used and compressratio? For example, # zfs get -p all home1/home1mm01 NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE home1/home1mm01 type volume - home1/home1mm01 creation 1254440045 - home1/home1mm01 used 14902492672

I just setup a new SSD with my laptop root filesystem, and at the time I though, "eh, I''ll just use zlib compression during the first copy, and then switch to lzo afterwards to maintain write speed when I''m using the laptop after the copy and reboot". Now, I rebooted with the new ssd and zlib compressed rootfs, and it seemed to boot slower than it did before with the

Hi all, as suggested on the mailing list I have converted the updated LZO code into git, so please pull my "lzo-update" branch from git://github.com/markus-oberhumer/linux.git lzo-update You can browse the branch at https://github.com/markus-oberhumer/linux/compare/lzo-update I''d ask some official kernel maintainer for review and to push this into linux-next so that it

Hello, I try to install tinc under cygwin. When I make an ./configure with tinc-1.0.1 I get the error-message checking for lzo1x_1_compress in -llzo... no configure: error:"lzo libraries not found" I have installed lzo-1.08. But it was not from the cygwin-Homepage and so I think that there was a wrong installation-path for the lzo-libraries. How can I find out where to install the

Hi, I planned to boost my btrfs performance today. here some errors I met: my ''btrfs filesystem show'' result: ~ # btrfs filesystem show failed to read /dev/sr0 Label: none uuid: 9b9aa9d9-760e-445c-a0ab-68e102d9f02e Total devices 1 FS bytes used 36.59GB devid 1 size 49.52GB used 49.52GB path /dev/sda6 Label: none uuid: 559dec06-4fd0-47c1-97b8-cc4fa6153fa0

- Add incompat flag, otherwise btrfs-progs will report error when operating on btrfs filesystems mounted with lzo option. - Allow to turn on lzo compression for defrag operation: # btrfs filesystem defragment -c[zlib, lzo] <file> Note: "-c zlib" will fail, because that''s how getopt() works for optional arguments. Signed-off-by: Li Zefan

Hi, Running 9.2-PRERELEASE #19 r253313 I got the following panic Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 22; apic id = 46 fault virtual address = 0xffffff827ebca30c fault code = supervisor read data, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff81983055 stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffffcf75bd60a0 frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffffcf75bd68f0

The prescription for Boot Info Table says that checksumming begins at byte 64 of isolinux.bin. When prepcore writes isolinux.bin it begins copying bytes from the input file at the offset given by variable "start". But it begins checksumming at offset 64 of the input file. The problem exists since introduction of prepcore by release 4.00. ISO 9660 programs usually fix it when they write

Hi, I am able to reproduce the following panic on a number of Solaris 10 06/06 boxes (Sun Blade 150, V210 and T2000). The script to do this is: #!/bin/sh -x uname -a mkfile 100m /data zpool create tank /data zpool status cd /tank ls -al cp /etc/services . ls -al cd / rm /data zpool status # uncomment the following lines if you want to see the system think # it can still read and write to the

Hi Lin, In addition to bug 6541114... Bug ID 6541114 Synopsis GRUB/ZFS fails to load files from a default compressed (lzjb) root ... I found yet another way to get the "Error 16: Inconsistent filesystem structure" from GRUB. This time when trying to boot a Xen Dom0 from a zfs bootfs Synopsis: grub/zfs-root: cannot boot xen from a zfs root

Hello All, I am running NTFS over iSCSI on a ZFS ZVOL volume with compression=gzip-9 and blocksize=8K. The server is 2 core P4 3.0 Ghz with 5 GB of RAM. Whenever I start copying files from Windows onto the ZFS disk, after about 100-200 Mb been copied the server starts to experience freezes. I have iostat running, which freezes as well. Even pings on both of the network adapters are reporting

After a crash, in my zpool tree, some dataset report this we i do a ls -la: brwxrwxrwx 2 777 root 0, 0 Oct 18 2009 mail-cts also if i set zfs set mountpoint=legacy dataset and then i mount the dataset to other location before the directory tree was only : dataset - vdisk.raw The file was a backing device of a Xen VM, but i cannot access the directory structure of this dataset. However i

Do we have enormous fragmentation here on our X4500 with Solaris 10, ZFS Version 10? What except zfs send/receive can be done to free the fragmented space? One ZFS was used for some month to store some large disk images (each 50GByte large) which are copied there with rsync. This ZFS then reports 6.39TByte usage with zfs list and only 2TByte usage with du. The other ZFS was used for similar

The size of de/compress buffer and LZO1X_MEM_COMPRESS is small enough. Allocating it with kmalloc rather than vmalloc is preferred. This patch depends on my previous patch, “btrfs: fix decompress buffer size”. Signed-off-by: Kyungsik Lee <kyungsik.lee@lge.com> Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> --- fs/btrfs/lzo.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)