similar to: zfs send/receive question

Hello folks, I have strange and unusual request... I have two 300gig drives mirrored: [11:33:22] root at chrysek: /d/d2 > zpool status pool: mypool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0

hello everyone, I have strange issue and I am not sure why is this happening. syncing file systems... done rebooting... SC Alert: Host System has Reset Probing system devices Probing memory Probing I/O buses Sun Fire V240, No Keyboard Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. OpenBoot 4.22.19, 8192 MB memory installed, Serial #65031515. Ethernet address 0:3:ba:e0:4d:5b, Host

hello folks, I am running Solaris 10 U3 and I have small problem that I dont know how to fix... I had a pool of two drives: bash-3.00# zpool status pool: mypool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypool ONLINE 0 0 0 emcpower0a ONLINE 0 0 0 emcpower1a ONLINE

$ zfs list -t filesystem NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT datapool 840M 25.5G 21K /datapool datapool/virtualbox 839M 25.5G 839M /virtualbox mypool 8.83G 6.92G 82K /mypool mypool/ROOT 5.48G 6.92G 21K legacy mypool/ROOT/May25-2010-Image-Update

On 29/10/2007, Tek Bahadur Limbu <teklimbu at wlink.com.np> wrote: > I created a ZFS file system like the following with /mypool/cache being > the partition for the Squid cache: > > 18:51:27 root at solaris:~$ zfs list > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > mypool 478M 31.0G 10.0M /mypool > mypool/cache 230M 9.78G 230M

Hi, I had a plan to set up a zfs pool with different raid levels but I ran into an issue based on some testing I''ve done in a VM. I have 3x 750 GB hard drives and 2x 320 GB hard drives available, and I want to set up a RAIDZ for the 750 GB and mirror for the 320 GB and add it all to the same pool. I tested detaching a drive and it seems to seriously mess up the entire pool and I

Hello all, First off, i''m talking about a SXDE build 89. Sorry if that was discussed here before, but i did not find anything related on the archives, and i think is a "weird" issue... If i try to remove a specific file, i got: # rm file1 rm: file1: No such file or directory # rm -rf dir2 rm: Unable to remove directory dir2: Directory not empty Take a look: ------- cut

Has there been any discussion here about the idea integrating a virtual IP into ZFS. It makes sense to me because of the integration of NFS and iSCSI with the sharenfs and shareiscsi properties. Since these are both dependent on an IP it would be pretty cool if there was also a virtual IP that would automatically move with the pool. Maybe something like "zfs set ip.nge0=x.x.x.x mypool"

Hi, I do have a disk array that is providing striped LUNs to my Solaris box. Hence I''d like to simply concat those LUNs without adding another layer of striping. Is this possibile with ZFS? As far as I understood, if I use zpool create myPool lun-1 lun-2 ... lun-n I will get a RAID0 striping where each data block is split across all "n" LUNs. If that''s

I had created a virtualbox VM to test out opensolaris. I updated to latest dev build and set my things up. Tested pools and various configs/commands. Learnt format/partition etc. And then, I wanted to move this stuff to a solaris partition on the physical disk. VB provides physical disk access. I put my solaris partition in there and created slices for root, swap etc. in that partition inside the

somehow I have issue replacing my disk. [20:09:29] root at adas: /root > zpool status mypooladas pool: mypooladas state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices could not be opened. Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a degraded state. action: Attach the missing device and online it using ''zpool online''. see:

I am running some qemu-kvm virtual machines via libvirt using Ceph RBD as the back-end storage. Today I was testing an update to libvirt-1.0.6 on one of my hosts and discovered that it includes this change: [libvirt] [PATCH] Forbid use of ':' in RBD pool names ...People are known to be abusing the lack of escaping in current libvirt to pass arbitrary args to QEMU. I am one of those

Hi forum, I''m currently a little playing around with ZFS on my workstation. I created a standard mirrored pool over 2 disk-slices. # zpool status Pool: mypool Status: ONLINE scrub: Keine erforderlich config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t0d0s4 ONLINE

Hi Is it possible to convert live 3 disks zpool from raidz to raidz2 And is it possible to add 1 new disk to raidz configuration without backups and recreating zpool from cratch. Thanks This message posted from opensolaris.org

*Synopsis*: "set once" / "create time only" properties can''t be set for pool level dataset Due to a change requested by <User 1-5Q-12446>, <User 1-5Q-12446> is now the responsible engineer for: CR 6647661 changed on Jan 7 2008 by <User 1-5Q-12446> === Field ============ === New Value ============= === Old Value ============= Responsible Engineer

*Synopsis*: "set once" / "create time only" properties can''t be set for pool level dataset CR 6647661 changed on Apr 15 2009 by <User 1-ERV-6> === Field ============ === New Value ============= === Old Value ============= See Also 6828754 ====================== ===========================

Hello all, Is there any way to mount zfs file system from vfstab? Thanks, Chris

New server build with Solaris-10 u5/08, on a SunFire t5220, and this is our first rollout of ZFS and Zpools. Have 8 disks, boot disk is hardware mirrored (c1t0d0 + c1t1d0) Created Zpool my_pool as RaidZ using 5 disks + 1 spare: c1t2d0, c1t3d0, c1t4d0, c1t5d0, c1t6d0, and spare c1t7d0 I am working on alerting & recovery plans for disks failures in the zpool. As a test, I have pulled disk

I''d like to replace/upgrade two 500GB disks in RaidZ2 vdev with 1TB disks, but I have some preliminary questions/concerns before trying ''zfs replace dpool ?'' Will ZFS permit this replacement? Will ZFS use the extra space in a heterogeneous RaidZ2 vdev, or is the size limited by the smallest disk in the vdev? Thanks in advance, Vizzini The system is currently running

Hi All, ZPOOL / ZFS commands writes EFI label on a device if we create ZPOOL/ZFS fs on it. Is it true ? I formatted a device with VTOC lable and I created a ZFS file system on it. Now which label the ZFS device has ? is it old VTOC or EFI ? After creating the ZFS file system on a VTOC labeled disk, I am seeing the following warning messages. Feb 3 07:47:00 scoobyb