similar to: server signing = mandatory/required broken in 4.17.5 ?

Hello, I have updated my system to Debian 12 with Samba 4.17.12, but the problem with performance still exist. On the Samba page there is a note in the CVE-2016-2114 description: "Note that the default for server roles other than active directory domain controller, is "off" because of performance reasons." https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2016-2114.html Does it mean

On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:13:49 +0200 Adam B?aszczykowski via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > I'm experiencing very slow read/write performance, about 20 MB/s, on > Samba share when I configure the "server signing" option as > "mandatory". Once I set "server signing" to "default", the read/write > performance returns

I'm trying to get nessus setup for doing some internal security checking. I installed the ports for nessus and nessus-plugins, and everything worked as expected. I then registered for the full feed of plugins, which got me up to over 10,000 plugins. I restarted nessus, and it didn't work at all. I am running without X11, so I'm doing batch runs. I already have nmap installed, so I

hi gurus: tried to install nessus and it would not compile: ===> Configuring for nessus-libraries-2.2.9_1 ******************************************************** * W a r n i n g * * * * Nessus needs Berkeley Packet Filter (bpf). * * To use nessus, your kernel must be rebuilt with bpf, * *

Using samba 3.5.12 on aix 6.1 when I set "server signing = mandatory" nothing can connect to my server. Included the smb.conf followed by errors showing up in the level 10 debug output. Thanks, >cat /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf [global] workgroup = somename netbios name = someserver server string = somename Samba Server %v security = user

I know this question has been posed over and over (and over) again, but I'm at my wit's end. I've dug into the Samba docs, Gentoo specific docs, and PAM docs, and Googled the heck out of it... In any event, I'm running Gentoo 2006.0 (just built) running kernel 2.6.15 and Samba 3.0.21b. I'm 'trying' to set up a simple file server with SSO capabilities to a 2K AD

I have users that belong to several groups. I want a logon script to be run for each of the groups to which a user belongs. For example, when I logon, I want admin.bat, users.bat, and someothergroup.bat to run. On Novell I used to use 'if Member of groupName...', but I don't know how to do this in Samba.. Thanks, Dean

I have a fedora core 5 server running samba-3.0.23c-1.fc5 from fedora updates. Recently I changed smb.conf to use security=domain instead of security=user. The server that it authenticates against is running fedora core 4 with samba-3.0.14a-2. Anyway, this setup worked just fine for a couple of weeks, but today I yum updated many packages including pam, glibc and kernel on the fedora 5

I have some quetions/ideas for the Asterisk Call Queues system. System information: - Fedora Core 1 - Kernel 2.4.22-1.2115.nptl - Asterisk CVS-HEAD-09/08/04-17:43:15 1.> I sould like it that if a user is in the que and the expected wait time is longer then xxx seconds or there are more then xxx callers. That there is played a sound from directory xxx with some product information

Recently, i scanned my samba4.1 server by Nessus (a vulnerability scanner tool - http://www.tenable.com/products/nessus) Nessus says that Samba4 is vulnerable to "LDAP NULL BASE Search Access" as "The remote LDAP server may disclose sensitive information." Further it says that - The remote LDAP server supports search requests with a null, or empty, base object. This allows

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- - --------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Security Advisory Synopsis: Buffer overflow problem in the inews program Advisory ID: RHSA-1999:033-01 Issue date: 1999-09-01 Keywords: inn inews buffer overflow - --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Topic: New packages for INN

Hi there, I'm unclear on this warning I got from NeWT when I scanned my Linux workstation. Could someone clarify for me if I should be worried? Thanks, ...Paul ------------------------ microsoft-ds (445/tcp) It was possible to log into the remote host using the following login/password combinations : 'administrator'/''

Hi Ryan, I am not authenticating to any Windows server, I just have the samba server itself set up with 3 users who an login. ...Paul Ryan Frantz wrote: >Paul, > >Are you using a Windows PDC or ADS to authenticate your Samba shares? >If so, the problem would not be with Samba, but with the authenticating >server. > >Ryan > >-----Original Message----- >From:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=870 Summary: Iptables cannot block outbound packets sent by Nessus Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

Paul, Are you using Samba to authenticate then? You've created user accounts on your Linux system that map to Windows accounts and built the Samba password database using 'smbpasswd'? ry -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces+ryanfrantz=informed-llc.com@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+ryanfrantz=informed-llc.com@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Paul Bradshaw Sent:

Hi (+mailing list again for the archives) My config which does show previous versions: # /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd --version Version 4.6.11 To avoid having this config block within in each share, I define the following within the [global] section:   shadow:snapprefix = ^\(monthly\)\{0,1\}\(weekly\)\{0,1\}\(daily\)\{0,1\}$   shadow:delimiter = _UTC_   shadow:format =

This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---1463810815-1223308169-936489982=:15281 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9909050208003.15329@prof.fr.nessus.org> Hello, ProFTPd, a FTP

Hi, I notice you're using 4.6.2 and I'm using 4.6.11. I made the following comment at some point within [global]:   #disable "unix extensions" to avoid using "allow insecure wide links"   #  for access to ../xxxx_SNAPS for BTRFS "previous versions" snapshots   #  --it seems to have reverted once more to not need the below two settings   ##unix

I have the Win2000 client(s) in a Samba domain. Domain authentication works fine, my "homes" share works fine, remote profiles work fine. Using 3.0.1Pre1 I would like to add people to "someshare" through the Security tab, and control their access through windows ACL's. How should I setup a share as a basis for doing this? The share below (someshare) in this email

I'm trying to get get nessus 2.2.5 to install on my centos 3.5 system. It errors out with this error: Press ENTER to continue x - Compiling the libraries x -- Configuring the sources for your system configure: error: Could not find OpenSSL and OpenSSL headers on your system **** An error occured :/ Do you want to save the compilation log to analyze what went wrong ? [y] Where should I save