similar to: Move data from the zpool (root) to a zfs file system

Hi all I have installed a new server with 77 2TB drives in 11 7-drive RAIDz2 VDEVs, all on WD Black drives. Now, it seems two of these drives were bad, one of them had a bunch of errors, the other was very slow. After zfs offlining these and then zfs replacing them with online spares, resilver ended and I thought it''d be ok. Appearently not. Albeit the resilver succeeds, the pool status

Hello, Thanks again. I have checked the configure step, the only messages I get containing pcre are: checking for pcre_fullinfo in -lpcre... yes checking pcre.h usability... yes checking pcre.h presence... yes checking for pcre.h... yes checking pcre/pcre.h usability... no checking pcre/pcre.h presence... no checking for pcre/pcre.h... no checking if PCRE version >= 8.20, < 10.0 and has

Thanks again, sorry I didn't specify this. I am loading new libraries to get to this point. The script I run for "configure" is: #Load the new curl module module load libs/gcc/4.4.7/curl/7.47.1 #Load the new xzutils module module load apps/gcc/4.4.7/xzutils/5.2.2 #Load the new zlib module module load libs/gcc/4.4.7/zlib/1.2.8 #Load the new bzip2 module module load

Hello experts, I''ve had a lingering question for some time: when I use "zpool iostat -v" the values do not quite sum up. In the example below with a raidz2 array made of 6 drives: * the reported 33K of writes are less than two disks'' workload at this time (at 17.9K each), overall disks writes are 107.4K = 325% of 33K. * write ops sum up to 18 = 225% of 8 ops to

Hello, I am trying to build R from source on Scientific Linux release 6.9 (Carbon), Linux version 2.6.32-696.3.2.el6.x86_64 (Red Hat 4.4.7-18). I load the needed modules and run: *./configure --prefix $install_dir --with-blas --with-lapack --enable-R-shlib 2>&1 | tee config-R-$version.log* The "configure" command seems to run ok: *R is now configured for

Hi list, First off: # cat /etc/release Solaris 10 6/06 s10x_u2wos_09a X86 Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 09 June 2006 Here''s an (almost) disaster scenario that came to life over the past week. We have a very large zpool

I''m using Solaris 10u6 updated to u7 via patches, and I have a pool with a mirrored pair and a (shared) hot spare. We reconfigured disks a while ago and now the controller is c4 instead of c2. The hot spare was originally on c2, and apparently on rebooting it didn''t get found. So, I looked up what the new name for the hot spare was, then added it to the pool with "zpool

I''ve got a zpool that has 4 raidz2 vdevs each with 4 disks (750GB), plus 4 spares. At one point 2 disks failed (in different vdevs). The message in /var/adm/messages for the disks were ''device busy too long''. Then SMF printed this message: Nov 23 04:23:51 x.x.com EVENT-TIME: Fri Nov 23 04:23:51 EST 2007 Nov 23 04:23:51 x.x.com PLATFORM: Sun Fire X4200 M2, CSN:

I''m testing an Iscsi multipath configuration on a T2000 with two disk devices provided by a Netapp filer. Both the T2000 and the Netapp have two ethernet interfaces for Iscsi, going to separate switches on separate private networks. The scsi_vhci devices look like this in `format'': 1. c4t60A98000433469764E4A413571444B63d0 <NETAPP-LUN-0.2-50.00GB>

Is it true that Solaris 10 u4 does not have any of the nice ZIL controls that exist in the various recent Open Solaris flavors? I would like to move my ZIL to solid state storage, but I fear I can''t do it until I have another update. Heck, I would be happy to just be able to turn the ZIL off to see how my NFS on ZFS performance is effected before spending the $''s. Anyone

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 03:00:11PM +0100, Csaba Henk wrote: > Hi, > > I scribbled a simple guestfs based program called guestfs-xfer with > following synopsis: > > Usage: guest-xfer [options] [op] [diskimage] > > op = [ls|cat|write] > > options: > -d, --guestdevice DEV guest device > --blocksize BS blocksize [default:

Hi List, First of all: S10u4 120011-14 So I have the weird situation. Earlier this week, I finally mirrored up two iSCSI based pools. I had been wanting to do this for some time, because the availability of the data in these pools is important. One pool mirrored just fine, but the other pool is another story. First lesson (I think) is you should scrub your pools, at least those backed by

Hi, I scribbled a simple guestfs based program called guestfs-xfer with following synopsis: Usage: guest-xfer [options] [op] [diskimage] op = [ls|cat|write] options: -d, --guestdevice DEV guest device --blocksize BS blocksize [default: 1048576] -o, --offset OFF offset [default: 0] So eg. `cat /dev/urandom | guest-xfer -d /dev/sda

OEL 5, OCFS 1.4, using EMC Power Path for multi pathing. I want t mount the OCFS2 file system on the emc power path device. I can mount by UUID, and not have to worry about persistent bindings across nodes. But how do I make sure when it mounts by UUID , that the pwoer path device is used. Any help will be much appreciated. Thanks -- Sridhar Avantsa savantsa at gmail.com -------------- next

Hello zfs-discuss, S10U4+patches, SPARC If I attach a disk to vdev in a pool to get mirrored configuration then during resilver zpool iostat 1 will report only reads being done from pool and basically no writes. If I do zpool iostat -v 1 then I can see it is writing to new device however on a pool and mirror/vdev level it is still reporting only reads. If during resilvering reads

Customer has a Thumper running: SunOS x4501 5.10 Generic_120012-14 i86pc i386 i86pc where running "zpool detech disk c6t7d0" to detech a mirror causes zpool command to hang with following kernel stack trace: PC: _resume_from_idle+0xf8 CMD: zpool detach disk1 c6t7d0 stack pointer for thread fffffe84d34b4920: fffffe8001c30c10 [ fffffe8001c30c10 _resume_from_idle+0xf8() ]

I make a file zpool like this: bash-3.00# zpool status pool: filepool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM filepool ONLINE 0 0 0 /export/f1.dat ONLINE 0 0 0 /export/f2.dat ONLINE 0 0 0 /export/f3.dat ONLINE 0 0 0 spares

When you add "quiet" to the append line, Syslinux doesn't display the file reading progress anymore. When you use this option to boot an image with MEMDISK, you still get a lot of text. ========================== LABEL mydisk LINUX memdisk INITRD mydisk.img APPEND raw quiet ========================== The following patch makes MEMDISK silent when the quiet keyword is passed to the

For anyone looking for a cheap home ZFS server... Dell is having a sale on their PowerEdge SC440 for $199 (regular $598) through 11/12/2008. http://www.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/pedge_sc440?c=us&cs=04&l=en&s=bsd Its got Dual Core Intel? Pentium?E2180, 2.0GHz, 1MB Cache, 800MHz FSB and you can upgrade the memory (ECC too) to 2gb for 19$ bucks. @$199, I just

Hi. I'm moving some of my geli installation to a new machine. On an old machine it was running UFS. I use ZFS on a new machine, but I don't have an encrypted main pool (and I don't want to), so I'm kinda considering a way where I will make a zpool on a zvol encrypted by geli. Would it be completely insane (should I use UFS instead ?) or would it be still valid ? Thanks. Eugene.