similar to: Subsystem sftp invoked even though forced command created

On 30.06.23 17:56, MCMANUS, MICHAEL P wrote: > The actual command is similar to the following (parameters inserted to protect the source): > (print ${FQDN} ; print ${Environment} ; cat ${OutFileXML}) | \ > ssh -Ti ${EmbeddedPrivateKey} \ > -o HostKeyAlias="${Alias}" \ > -o

On 06.07.23 23:37, MCMANUS, MICHAEL P wrote:> So changing the forced command as stated will break the application. I > would need to create a test bed to simulate the listener rather than > use the server as is, where is. That may produce false or misleading > results. Since the forced command is tied to the specific keypair in the authorized_keys, you could -- test with a different

On 05.07.23 02:50, Damien Miller wrote: > Some possibilities: > 1. the receive.ksh script is faulty in some way that causes it to invoke > sftp-server How would the script even *know* that the client requested the SFTP subsystem? Is a subsystem's executable/path, supposedly internally overwritten with the forced command at that point, exposed through $SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND ?

This is a new branch of an old thread, made necessary because the email system here purges sent messages after a period of time so I can't reply to the last message in the thread. The operative portion of that last message (retrieved from the archives and dated July 3, 2023) follows: /*****/ So I set up a fresh key to use for this test, and gave it similar parameters. I wasn't aware of

On Mon, 3 Jul 2023, Jochen Bern wrote: > On 30.06.23 17:56, MCMANUS, MICHAEL P wrote: > > The actual command is similar to the following (parameters inserted to > > protect the source): > > (print ${FQDN} ; print ${Environment} ; cat ${OutFileXML}) | \ > > ssh -Ti ${EmbeddedPrivateKey} \ > > -o HostKeyAlias="${Alias}" \

Folks, I'm curious if the documented behavior of portable OpenSSH (specifically Linux) may be at odds with the actual behavior I have seen in my experiments. Here is the background: I manage an application which collects data from a client script (Korn shell) which runs on Unix and Linux servers across the entire enterprise. The client communicates with a Linux server (currently running RHEL

On 30/06/2023 09:56, Damien Miller wrote: > It's very hard to figure out what is happening here without a debug log. > > You can get one by stopping the listening sshd and running it manually > in debug mode, e.g. "/usr/sbin/sshd -ddd" Or starting one in debug mode on a different port, e.g. "-p99 -ddd"

Hi Jochen, On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 00:16, Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> wrote: > > On 02/11/2020 07:07 PM, Cl?ment P?ron wrote: > > - I have X devices (around 30) and one SSH server > > - Each of them have a unique public key and create one dynamic reverse > > port forwarding on the server > > - All of them connect with the same UNIX user (I don't

What I'm hearing in this thread is: "a minority of people on planet Earth have a problem with the open-source implementation of ED25519, but instead of letting that minority choose to re-implement it when/if they want to, the rest of the community needs to stall their progress in improving security." And isn't the ED25519 code is already there on their machine? So isn't

Hello everyone, I work in a setting where remote logins are usually authenticated with SSH user keypairs, but many target accounts need to have a password set nonetheless (to use with sudo, log in via remote KVM, etc.) and cannot be put under a central user administration like LDAP. Enter a corporate password policy that requires passwords to be complex, different everywhere, and of limited

On 05/16/2018 06:07 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> On 15 May 2018 at 22:43 Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: >> Is possible to implement and end-to-end encryption with dovecot, where >> server-side there is no private key to decrypt messages? > > You could probably automate this with sieve and e.g. GnuPG, which would mean > that all your

On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 15:57 +1100, Darren Tucker wrote: > That was the original intent (and it's mentioned in RFC4419) however > each moduli file we ship (70-80 instances of 6 sizes) takes about 1 > cpu-month to generate on a lowish-power x86-64 machine. Most of it > is > parallelizable, but even then it'd likely take a few hours to > generate > one of each size. I

Hello, I'd like to inform you that the next release of WinSCP SFTP client (version 5.7.5) will support Diffie-Hellman group exchange as specified by RFC 4419. http://winscp.net/tracker/show_bug.cgi?id=1345 So I'd like to ask you to kindly update the check in compat_datafellows() to WinSCP_release_4* WinSCP_release_5.0* WinSCP_release_5.1* WinSCP_release_5.2* WinSCP_release_5.5*

Hi, On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 03:16:00PM +0000, Jochen Bern wrote: > Out of interest: > 1. If an extended mechanism were to be implemented, which server pubkey > do you expect to be seen/stored/verified by the client? The proxy's > / v4 middlebox's, or the v6 backend's? Or would you require that all > server-side machines use the *same* host keypairs? I'd do

On 25.04.24 17:15, openssh-unix-dev-request at mindrot.org digested: > Subject: how to block brute force attacks on reverse tunnels? > From: Steve Newcomb <srn at coolheads.com> > Date: 25.04.24, 17:14 > > For many years I've been running ssh reverse tunnels on portable Linux, > OpenWRT, Android etc. hosts so they can be accessed from a server whose > IP is stable

hello dear Community, i want to get wine to run on OpenSuse 11.4-in order to use WinSCP (see http://winscp.net ) How to do this. Can some one help me here! Love to hear from you greetings lin BTW How to import the keys..? I guess that is not a big problem

Hello, I have asked on the postfix mailing list for a solution, how to encrypt incoming emails with public gpg key My original idea was to use a smtpd-milter, which would encrypt all incoming plaintext messages of given user, using the users public gpg key. This way, it would look as if the original sender has sent the message encrypted. Somebody suggested this might be better done in Dovecot,

Hello everyone, my workplace has gotten the idea of centrally maintaining a file in ssh_config syntax so that employees do not need to discover every new machine and configure it on their own. Since it's a case of "let's get started now, and properly think it through later", right now, a typical entry might look like > Host [product]-[Customer] > Hostname

On 12/15/2018 12:34 AM, @lbutlr wrote: > On 14 Dec 2018, at 16:30, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: >> Is it possible to override the POP3 delete on download command and make >> sure that messages stay on the server for at least X hours or X days? >> It is important that the messages be around long enough to hit a snapshot >> cycle (using rsnapshot to backup

Hello, I hope it's the correct ML to get support for "advanced" ssh use (sorry if it's not the case) And I would be very grateful if someone could help me on this issue. Here is my challenge : - I have X devices (around 30) and one SSH server - Each of them have a unique public key and create one dynamic reverse port forwarding on the server - All of them connect with the