similar to: Subsystem sftp invoked even though forced command created

On Mon, 3 Jul 2023, Jochen Bern wrote: > On 30.06.23 17:56, MCMANUS, MICHAEL P wrote: > > The actual command is similar to the following (parameters inserted to > > protect the source): > > (print ${FQDN} ; print ${Environment} ; cat ${OutFileXML}) | \ > > ssh -Ti ${EmbeddedPrivateKey} \ > > -o HostKeyAlias="${Alias}" \

On 30/06/2023 09:56, Damien Miller wrote: > It's very hard to figure out what is happening here without a debug log. > > You can get one by stopping the listening sshd and running it manually > in debug mode, e.g. "/usr/sbin/sshd -ddd" Or starting one in debug mode on a different port, e.g. "-p99 -ddd"

On 05.07.23 02:50, Damien Miller wrote: > Some possibilities: > 1. the receive.ksh script is faulty in some way that causes it to invoke > sftp-server How would the script even *know* that the client requested the SFTP subsystem? Is a subsystem's executable/path, supposedly internally overwritten with the forced command at that point, exposed through $SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND ?

On 05.07.23 18:01, MCMANUS, MICHAEL P wrote: > It appears the forced command either does not run or runs to completion > and exits immediately, as there is no process named "receive.ksh" in > the process tree. FWIW, two cents of mine: -- The script *exiting* should *not* prompt sshd to execute the requested subsystem "as a second thought", or else it'd happen

Hi, My xen guest stopped booting suddenly and giving me the below error message. Any idea what is going wrong here? DOM 0 boots OK though. ata5.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 ata5.00: irq_stat 0x40000008 ata5.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED ata5.00: cmd 60/00:00:cd:ee:36/02:00:09:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 262144 in res 51/40:72:5b:f0:36/d9:00:09:00:00/40 Emask

Hi, My xen guest stopped booting suddenly and giving me the below error message. Any idea what is going wrong here? DOM 0 boots OK though. ata5.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 ata5.00: irq_stat 0x40000008 ata5.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED ata5.00: cmd 60/00:00:cd:ee:36/02:00:09:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 262144 in res 51/40:72:5b:f0:36/d9:00:09:00:00/40 Emask

I''ve been trying to install a 2.6.37-12 kernel from kernel-ppa on one of my Ubuntu machines without success. It keeps giving errors like this: [ 9.115544] ata9: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0xf SErr 0x0 action 0x10 frozen [ 9.115550] ata9.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED [ 9.115556] ata9.00: cmd 60/04:00: d4:82:85/00:00:1f:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 2048 in [ 9.115557]

Observed on Linux 3.2.9 after the controller/disk flaked in-out. (The world still needs a SCSI error decoding tool to tell normal people what cmd and res are about.) [ 157.732885] device label srv devid 4 transid 11292 /dev/sdf [ 157.733201] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled [ 172.936515] device label srv devid 4 transid 11292 /dev/sdf [44106.091461] ata4.01: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0

On my C5 machine (a Dell XPS420) I have a 500Gb disk on the internal SATA controller. I also have a SiI3132 dual-port multi-device eSATA card. This is connected to an external SATA array of disks. Now occasionally I see something like this in my logs ata7.01: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 a ction 0x0 ata7.01: irq_stat 0x00060002, device error via D 2H FIS ata7.01: cmd

Hello, I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction? I am receiving these in my log file and do not know what they mean or what to look for; Mar 8 04:03:56 bms kernel: ata3.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0 Mar 8 04:03:56 bms kernel: ata3.00: cmd 25/00:28:42:d3:37/00:00:13:00:00/e0 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 20480 in Mar 8 04:03:56 bms kernel: res

`git describe' says V_7_3_P1-207-gc924b2ef (shouldn't it say V_7_4_P1-<yadayada>?). This is what I see: gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized -Wsign-compare -Wformat-security -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-unused-result -fno-strict-aliasing -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -ftrapv -fno-builtin-memset -fstack-protector-strong -fPIE -I. -I.

I just installed CentOS 5 on a computer. On boot, I get the a error message, related to 2 SATA disks. These errors did NOT appear on version 4.4 with the EXACT same hardware. Despite the error messages, the disks seem to be working with no problems. Could someone please tell me what these error are and if there is some known way to prevent them? I searched the Net for these errors and they seem

Hi, I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by Startech. The kernel (Linux viz1 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64) sees it as Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123 I use it to provide extra SATA ports to a raid system. The HD's are all "WD2003FYYS" and so run at 3Gbps on the 6Gbps controller. However I am seeing lots of instances of errors like this

On Fri 06/Sep/2013 10:12:29 +0200 Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 20:52 +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> >> I tried GRUB_CMDLINE_XEN="dom0_mem=8192M": that delivers 6964868K total, then >> crashes when used=2837436K free=4127432K. > > On a modern dom0 kernel you need to specify the maximum memory as well, > i.e. dom0_mem=8192M,max:8192M

On Fri, 2013-09-06 at 16:39 +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote: Both sets of log contain stuff like: > Sep 6 15:22:53 pcale kernel: [ 126.828195] ata4.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x80000 action 0x6 frozen > Sep 6 15:22:53 pcale kernel: [ 126.828199] ata4: SError: { 10B8B } > Sep 6 15:22:53 pcale kernel: [ 126.828201] ata4.00: failed command: SMART > Sep 6 15:22:53 pcale

Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6, with the one config file change) working for everyone: (turn off: CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM) If we don't hear any negative comments by Wednesday July 19th, 2017 then we are going to push those to updates as they solve iscsi issues with some hardware and don't seem to impact anything else based on limited testing. BTW

Ok, got a quickie. I have an eSATA drive, a 750GB Seagate in an eSATA external enclosure, and a Silicon Image sil3132 ExpressCard controller for my laptop. The disk and controller work great in CentOS 5 (or F7, for that matter), if I specifically mount it. This is not how I want to have to use this drive, however. I want to hotplug it; that is, plug the controller into the laptop, and then

Folks, I'm curious if the documented behavior of portable OpenSSH (specifically Linux) may be at odds with the actual behavior I have seen in my experiments. Here is the background: I manage an application which collects data from a client script (Korn shell) which runs on Unix and Linux servers across the entire enterprise. The client communicates with a Linux server (currently running RHEL

On 06.07.23 23:37, MCMANUS, MICHAEL P wrote:> So changing the forced command as stated will break the application. I > would need to create a test bed to simulate the listener rather than > use the server as is, where is. That may produce false or misleading > results. Since the forced command is tied to the specific keypair in the authorized_keys, you could -- test with a different

On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6, >> with the one config file change) working for everyone: >> >> (turn off: CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM) > > Hello. > Maybe it's not the most appropriate thread or time, but I have been >