similar to: remove_me files building up

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "remove_me files building up"

2023 Jul 04
1
remove_me files building up
Hi, Thanks for your response, please find the xfs_info for each brick on the arbiter below: root at uk3-prod-gfs-arb-01:~# xfs_info /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1 meta-data=/dev/sdc1 isize=512 agcount=31, agsize=131007 blks = sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1 = crc=1 finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=0 =
2023 Jul 04
1
remove_me files building up
Hi Strahil, We're using gluster to act as a share for an application to temporarily process and store files, before they're then archived off over night. The issue we're seeing isn't with the inodes running out of space, but the actual disk space on the arb server running low. This is the df -h? output for the bricks on the arb server: /dev/sdd1 15G 12G 3.3G 79%
2023 Jul 05
1
remove_me files building up
Hi Strahil, This is the output from the commands: root at uk3-prod-gfs-arb-01:~# du -h -x -d 1 /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick 2.2G /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/.glusterfs 24M /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/scalelite-recordings 16K /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/mytute 18M /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/.shard 0
2023 Jul 03
1
remove_me files building up
Hi, you mentioned that the arbiter bricks run out of inodes.Are you using XFS ?Can you provide the xfs_info of each brick ? Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov? On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 19:41, Liam Smith<liam.smith at ek.co> wrote: Hi, We're running a cluster with two data nodes and one arbiter, and have sharding enabled. We had an issue a while back where one of the server's
2023 Jul 04
1
remove_me files building up
Hi Liam, I saw that your XFS uses ?imaxpct=25? which for an arbiter brick is a little bit low. If you have free space on the bricks, increase the maxpct to a bigger value, like:xfs_growfs -m 80 /path/to/brickThat will set 80% of the Filesystem for inodes, which you can verify with df -i /brick/path (compare before and after).?This way?you won?t run out of inodes in the future. Of course, always
2023 Jul 04
1
remove_me files building up
Thanks for the clarification. That behaviour is quite weird as arbiter bricks should hold?only metadata. What does the following show on host?uk3-prod-gfs-arb-01: du -h -x -d 1?/data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brickdu -h -x -d 1?/data/glusterfs/gv1/brick3/brickdu -h -x -d 1 /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick2/brick If indeed the shards are taking space -?that is a really strange situation.From which version
2008 Feb 21
3
applying a function to data frame columns
useR's, I want to apply this function to the columns of a data frame: u[u >= range(v)[1] & u <= range(v)[2]] where u is the n column data frame under consideration and v is a data frame of values with the same number of columns as u. For example, v1 <- c(1,2,3) v2 <- c(3,4,5) v3 <- c(2,3,4) v <- as.data.frame(cbind(v1,v2,v3)) uk1 <- seq(min(v1) - .5, max(v1) + .5,
2017 Jan 03
2
shadow_copy and glusterfs not working
Hello, we are trying to configure a CTDB-Cluster with Glusterfs. We are using Samba 4.5 together with gluster 3.9. We set up a lvm2 thin-provisioned volume to use gluster-snapshots. Then we configured the first share without using shadow_copy2 and everything was working fine. Then we added the shadow_copy2 parameters, when we did a "smbclient" we got the following message: root at
2018 Feb 07
0
Fwd: Troubleshooting glusterfs
Hello Nithya! Thank you for your help on figuring this out! We changed our configuration and after having a successful test yesterday we have run into new issue today. The test including moderate read/write (~20-30 Mb/s) and scaling the storage was running about 3 hours and at some moment system got stuck: On the user level there are such errors when trying to work with filesystem: OSError:
2006 Nov 01
1
Windows != Samba - NETBIOS name handling
Hi, I'm using samba just for its "net join" functionality. Computer accounts and kerberos keytabs are created by Samba in Active Directory via "net ads join", then used by UNIX clients to authorise and authenticate via LDAP and Kerberos. Samba works perfectly until the computers hostname is longer than 15 characters. Then any attempt to join the domain fails with: ----
2018 Feb 09
0
self-heal trouble after changing arbiter brick
Hey, Did the heal completed and you still have some entries pending heal? If yes then can you provide the following informations to debug the issue. 1. Which version of gluster you are running 2. gluster volume heal <volname> info summary or gluster volume heal <volname> info 3. getfattr -d -e hex -m . <filepath-on-brick> output of any one of the which is pending heal from all
2018 Feb 09
1
self-heal trouble after changing arbiter brick
Hi Karthik, Thank you very much, you made me much more relaxed. Below is getfattr output for a file from all the bricks: root at gv2 ~ # getfattr -d -e hex -m . /data/glusterfs/testset/306/30677af808ad578916f54783904e6342.pack getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: data/glusterfs/testset/306/30677af808ad578916f54783904e6342.pack
2018 Feb 09
0
self-heal trouble after changing arbiter brick
Hi Karthik, Thank you for your reply. The heal is still undergoing, as the /var/log/glusterfs/glustershd.log keeps growing, and there's a lot of pending entries in the heal info. The gluster version is 3.10.9 and 3.10.10 (the version update in progress). It doesn't have info summary [yet?], and the heal info is way too long to attach here. (It takes more than 20 minutes just to collect
2018 Feb 08
5
self-heal trouble after changing arbiter brick
Hi folks, I'm troubled moving an arbiter brick to another server because of I/O load issues. My setup is as follows: # gluster volume info Volume Name: myvol Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: 43ba517a-ac09-461e-99da-a197759a7dc8 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 3 x (2 + 1) = 9 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: gv0:/data/glusterfs Brick2: gv1:/data/glusterfs Brick3:
2024 Jan 26
1
Gluster communication via TLS client problem
Hi to all, The system is running Debian 12 with Gluster 10. All systems are using the same versions. I try to encrypt the communication between the peers and the clients via TLS. The encryption between the peers works, but when I try to mount the volume on the client I always get an error. What have I done? 1. all hosts and clients can resolve the name of all systems involved. 2. the
2004 Aug 06
4
FreeRadio On-line
See: http://uk2.lugradio.org/ Somewere heve more example of radio using icecast, for me? :) -- Abraços, Tiago Cruz Org. King de Contab. S/C Ltda. Linux User # 282636 http://www.linuxrapido.linuxdicas.com.br Mandrake Linux i18n Team --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
2009 May 05
2
problem with ggplot2 boxplot, groups and facets
I have a following problem: The call qplot(wg, v.realtime, data=df.best.medians$gv1, colour=sp, geom="boxplot") works nice: for each value of the wg factor I get two box-plots (two levels in the sp factor) in different colours, side-by-side, centered at the wg x-axis. However, I want to separate the data belonging to different levels of the n factor, so I add the facets option:
2013 Jul 24
1
Libvirt and Glusterfs pool
Hi, I use the QEMU-GlusterFS native integration (no Fuse mount) with the libvirt. Now I create a volume issuing : # qemu-img create gluster://localhost/gv1/test.img 5G Then using the libvirt I declare the following lines in my domain.xml : <disk type='network' device='disk'> <driver name='qemu' cache='none'/> <source
2011 Oct 06
1
fuse mount disconnecting...
hi, i am getting regular crashes which result in the mount being dropped: n1:~ # ls /n/auto/gv1/ ls: cannot access /n/auto/gv1/: Transport endpoint is not connected client side error log: http://pastebin.com/UgMaLq42 ..i am also finding that the gluster severs also sometimes just drop out - and i need to kill all the server side gluster processes and restart glusterd. i'm not sure if
2007 Jul 21
0
[LLVMdev] Seg faulting on vector ops
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Chuck Rose III wrote: > I'm looking to make use of the vectorization primitives in the Intel > chip with the code we generate from LLVM and so I've started > experimenting with it. What is the state of the machine code generated > for vectors? In my tinkering, I seem to be getting some wonky machine > instructions, but I'm most likely just doing