similar to: ACL Support and Samba

Hi Guys, I have a server running CentOS 4.2 with a 2.6.9-22EL-smp kernel. The system contains a 2.3 TB RAID 5 array. There is a 20GB root partition with the remainder of the drive configured one large LVM volume. (/u0) I have installed Veritas Netbackup on the server and am running a few tests. Small backups and restores work just fine. When I run a larger backup (500MB) and store the

Hi guys, I've got a problem where if I set permissions on a folder(Admin) "setfacl -R -d -m u::rwx,g::wrx,o::- Admin/" and "setfacl -m o:- Admin" I get the following. mail:/data/samba/shared # getfacl Admin/ # file: Admin # owner: BCP+administrator # group: samba user::rwx user:samba:rwx group::rwx group:BCP+admin:r-x mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx

Dear All I am facing a strange problem that I could not solve, so, maybe you can help me. Look at this situation: I created a new directory with those ACLs (through Samba using Windows XP) [root@server /home/smb/adm]# getfacl teste #file:teste #owner:1002 #group:1006 user::rwx group::rwx group:suporte:rwx group:administ:rwx mask::rwx other::--- [root@server /home/smb/adm]# getfacl -d teste

A bit of a minor off-topic issue, but on the off-chance that someone understands how ACLs work ... I've been trying to see if using default ACLs would help with the following issue: I have a third party application that is running as a non-root user ('user-a') and creating log files with mode 0600 (read/write only to the owner) in a log directory I have another application that

When a directory has a default ACL and a subdirectory is created under that directory, btrfs_init_acl() is called when the subdirectory''s inode is created to initialize the inode''s ACL (inherited from the parent directory) but it was clearing the ACL from the inode after setting it if posix_acl_create() returned success, instead of clearing it only if it returned an error. To

Wonder if someone can point me in the right direction here - just built some new bricks running gluster 3.4 alpha 3 (from http://download.gluster.org) with the objective of testing them to replace some existing 3.2 systems in production. The main thing I was after was NFS ACL support, however on getting everything setup, I still don't seem to be able to see POSIX extended ACLs on the

I hav a problem porting my ACLS from my old filserver to a new one... My old Fileserver: I have my shares on a partition supporting acls with ext3 /dev/md0 on /data/raid type ext3 (rw,acl,user_xattr) My new Fileserver: /dev/md0 on /data/raid type ext4 (rw,acl,user_xattr) Now I copied all my shares to the new Fileserver with rsync and backed up my acls with: getfacl -R

Hello, we are using the vfs module recycle with the following config: vfs objects = recycle recycle: repository = .Papierkorb recycle:directory_mode = 0777 recycle:subdir_mode = 0777 recycle: keeptree = Yes recycle: exclude = *.tmp, *.temp, *.log, *.ldb recycle: exclude_dir = tmp recycle:versions = Yes Problem is that everybody can see deleted documents in the recycle bin. But if I set

Hello, I am running Fedora Core 2. Kernel: linux-2.6.5-1.358 Kernel supports ACL: [root@atlas configs]# grep FS_SECURITY kernel-2.6.5-i686-smp.config CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_XFS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_DEVPTS_FS_SECURITY=y [root@atlas configs]# grep XATTR kernel-2.6.5-i686-smp.config CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_DEVPTS_FS_XATTR=y Have

hi, I've recently set up a SAMBA/PDC domain controler with LDAP. My homes shares are in a XFS quota/acl enabled filesystem setfacl/getfacl works onto the linux Mandrake 9.2 box well, I mean user with more permissions set into ACL can write to the directory concerned. My problem is that ACL file permissions seems to not be readed by Samba when accessing files with a w2k box. here is more

OK so I've got samba-3.0.11 compiled with ACL support. I've running 2.4.25 with the ACL/ATTR patch applied. I can read and set ACLS's using the getfacl/setfacl programs. ldd /usr/sbin/smbd shows it's linked to libattr.so.1 and libacl.so.1. I can read ACL with the smbcacls program, but when I try to set them I get: ERROR: Unable to open credentials file! Also from the

Hi Guys, I'm 100% sure this is not a Linux issue but I want a second opinion... I have a Linux server running CentOS. It was been absolutely perfect without any errors or problems. Since Monday it has been unable to send email. It is configured to act as a smart host. All email gets forwarded to smtp.isp.net. The server is on a network behind a firewall completely nat'd. No ports

On 2019-02-19 3:47 pm, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:25:51 -0500 >> What exactly does "START AGAIN" imply? Just chmod? > > 'ls' shows the correct ownership and Unix permissions: > > drwxrwx---+ 4 root domain admins 4096 Feb 17 19:13 programs > > But 'getfacl' show something different: > > getfacl:

On 22/11/15 10:04, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, jimc! > >> After much wailing and gnashing of teeth, I did a setfacl. > Unfortunately, Samba does not use POSIX ACL's, if its own ACL's are present on > files. (If at all.) > Unless you have it configured for POSIX ACL's, but that's not the case for DC. Samba doesn't use ACLs at all, it is just a bridge

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 #$ setfacl -m u:mf:r bla #$ getfacl bla # file: bla # owner: root # group: root user::rw- user:mf:r-- group::r-- mask::r-- other::r-- It is readable by mf like intended. #$ chmod go-rwx bla #$ getfacl bla # file: bla # owner: root # group: root user::rw- user:mf:r-- #effective:--- group::r-- #effective:--- mask::--- other::--- It is not

On btrfs, do the following ------------------ # su user1 # cd btrfs-part/ # touch aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rw- group::rw- other::r-- # su user2 # cd btrfs-part/ # setfacl -m u::rwx aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rwx <- successed to setfacl group::rw- other::r-- ------------------ but we

Hi Guys, I'm looking for a VPN solution that will run on CentOS. I've used PopTop with success but some clients have problems at hotels and other firewalled locations. If anyone can suggest something that works well with MS 2000/XP, doesn't require too much tweaking on the client side and is fairly resiliant to various firewall blocking, I'd be interested in hearing about it.

> > On the file serever: > > Collected config --- 2019-07-03-10:27 ----------- > > > > Hostname: srv > > DNS Domain: a.b.hu > > FQDN: srv.a.b.hu > > ipaddress: 10.0.3.15 192.168.0.8 > > ----------- > > Samba is running as a Unix domain member > > ----------- > > > > This computer is running Debian 10.0 x86_64 > >

Am 10.06.2015 um 03:25 schrieb Mike: > I'm learning to be very deliberate with changing posix and windows acl's so > I don't disturb users' access to files and folders. > I check acl's on a specific file/folder on the server with getfacl. > Then make one small acl modification to one file in a sub-directory of a > share. > Then record the difference reported

Hi I'm trying to make a share called dropbox rw for members of a group. /usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf [global] server role = domain controller workgroup = CACTUS realm = hh3.site netbios name = HH3 passdb backend = samba4 template shell = /bin/bash [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/hh3.site/scripts read only = No [sysvol] path =