similar to: Rsync sends again already existing files

> Hi, I probably can't help. The only time I had rsync Hi, thanks anyway for trying. > suggest is that your network bandwidth is being used up > by something else (whatever is using up that 4MB/s) but Chances are low because this value appears exactly when I launch the rsyncing. > be another 8MB/s to spare. Wireshark could help you > identify what the traffic is. Not sure

F27AE.9000301 at free.fr> Stephane Ascoet via rsync wrote: > Hi, I'm backing up contents of my GOBook(http://sascoet.mutu.fdn.fr/monalbum/albums/sa-12082010fujitsugigamos2300scsifleury-les-aubraisrecusdemonsauveurcomputermagneticsdmc-lx2/sa-1208201012h39fujitsugigamo2300scsiconnecteagobookfleury-les-aubraisrecusdemonsauveurcomputermagneticsdmc-lx2.jpg) > before it dies completely on

On 6/29/23 16:31, Stephane Ascoet via rsync wrote: > Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> le 29/06/2023 04:52: >> --itemize-changes will cause rsync to tell you what it thinks is > > Hi, thank you so much! Today I used a little different way of doing it, > and another computer, and the behaviour is the same. It seems that the > reason is a different timestamp. So the

Hi, I'm backing up contents of my GOBook(http://sascoet.mutu.fdn.fr/monalbum/albums/sa-12082010fujitsugigamos2300scsifleury-les-aubraisrecusdemonsauveurcomputermagneticsdmc-lx2/sa-1208201012h39fujitsugigamo2300scsiconnecteagobookfleury-les-aubraisrecusdemonsauveurcomputermagneticsdmc-lx2.jpg) before it dies completely on a dell laptop via my LAN(netstat indicates a 11.8MB/s speed between

I''ve got active_rbac installed and its not sending registration mails? I''m using delivery_method :msmtp, since my mail server usese TLS, when I call RegistrationMailer.deliver_confirm_registration(user, ''a'') from the console, it works perfectly, but when I call it from within my app, say in one of the controllers, the log shows it as having gone through, but

I''ve been using Mechanize for a project that i''ve been working on, but this is the first time i''m having to use forms (scraping previously). So, after i fill out the form, when I hit submit, it sends me information in the form of a text file to download. For the life of me, I can''t see how to get access to it. When clicking on a link, you can put a

It appears that there is some version of the Dovecot LDA that is sending an RFC 3798 MDN rather than an RFC 3464 DSN to report non-delivery to a user who is over quota. See <https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/693134> for a discussion of this and <https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/693134/+attachment/1773018/+files/Automatically%20rejected%20mail.msg> for the actual MDN

I''m trying to use send_data to send a simple text file. Every reference I can find says I can supply a MIME type with the ":type" option and that will determine the kind of file I get on the machine that downloads the file I''m sending. Instead I ALWAYS get an XML file. here''s the code snippet: File.open(@temp_download_file_path, ''r'') do

Hello all, I''m having trouble with this simple email class I made for postbacks. When I run this from the command line an email is sent, however when I access this .rb file through a browser nothing happens. ------------------------- #!/usr/bin/ruby require "rubygems" require "action_mailer" ActionMailer::Base.delivery_method = :smtp

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-03-22 22:37 ------- hm, sshd is not sending channel data after

The full SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_DATA packet looks like this: uint32 packet length byte SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_DATA uint32 recipient channel uint32 nr data bytes byte[] data OpenSSH_6.1p1 considers that the 'maximum packet size' from SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_OPEN or SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_OPEN_CONFIRMATION impacts only the 'byte[] data' field and not the entire message (headers included).

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1199 Summary: ssh sends invalid ttymodes when stdin is not a tty Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

I recently upgraded from a few month old CVS version of Asterisk to v1.0.1, and dialing out through my SPA-3000 stopped working. Notice right after INVITE, in the old CVS version, it includes the number I'm trying to dial (8019596) which works fine, however in v1.0.1, it doesn't include the number and of course the dial fails. Did a config option change out from underneath me or

I'm trying to figure out how Asterisk decides how often it will send SIP NOTIFY's to an ATA when a voicemail message is waiting for the user on the server. >From watching, it seems to be completely random. Sometimes 10 seconds apart, then 33 seconds, then 13 seconds, etc. Each time causes a "ring" on the ATA. I can change the ATA's behavior, but what I'd really

I have progressinband=yes in sip.conf, but Asterisk sends a 180-Ringing to my polycom phones and then it also sends 183-Session Progress. That doesn't seem to make sense. Shouldn't Asterisk NOT send 180-Ringing if progressinband=yes ? Doug.

> -----Original Message----- > From: Eric "ManxPower" Wieling [mailto:eric@fnords.org] > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 5:11 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk Sends 180-RINGING to UAeven > withprogressinband=yes > > > Douglas Garstang wrote: > > > > > > Andrew, >

Hmmm. Ok, that's true. At the very least it will create confusing CDR's I think... maybe. We're not billing our OnNet traffic at all. Only the traffic that goes OffNet, to our switch is billed (if it leaves our switch that is...). I was thinking earlier too that we only need progressinband on traffic that goes to the PSTN, via our switch. OnNet traffic will never generate reorder

For the life of me can't figure out why the Asterisk server generates an enormous quantity of outgoing packets on port 8004/udp. They seem to have no effect whether they are blocked by the firewall or not. We're running SIP. Everything appears to be OK (except a large number of ChanSpy write buffer overflow messages, which I also don't understand). How can I discover whether these

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Trey Hilyard <kctrey at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello - > > I am trying to decide if I have stumbled across a bug in PJSIP or I am > just missing something. My Asterisk has two interfaces, an "internal" eth0 > and an "external" eth1. In pjsip.conf, I define the following transports: > > [trusted] > type=transport >

According to the NBD spec, the server should close the connection rather than replying to NBD_CMD_DISC (after flushing any pending replies to earlier commands), and a compliant client should not send any data after that command. However, when nbdkit is running multithreaded, we already have multiple threads competing for a read lock, and each of those threads would try to read() from the socket,