similar to: perl on CentOS 4.4 : PERLIO=perlio vs stdio, readline error handling

After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ] crashes each time early in boot process on Compaq ProLiant 3000 with dual Pentium3 CPU (600 MHz, CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Katmai) stepping 03, CPU1 the same). I get kernel panic at powernowk8_init+0x05e/0x1c3. The previous kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.i686 ] seems to work fine. I am wondering if anyone has met

i'm running on vmware system and HP proliant DL360 G5 servers on wmware, on boot i have the following message: ----------------------------- Applying Intel Microcode update: don't know to make device "cpu/microcode" [OK] ----------------------------- and on a HP proliant DL360 G5 server , on boot i have too the following message: ----------------------------- Applying

Hi I am using SanitizerCoverage feature supported by clang to get the basicblock coverage. my tested binaries are spec cpu2006. I compiled the binary with the option COPTIMIZE = -O0 -fsanitize=address -fsanitize-coverage=bb -flto -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu89 -gdwarf-3 After the compiling process is end. I run the 400.perlbench. with the command ASAN_OPTIONS=coverage=1 ./perlbench.

Hi If so, is it able to disable this check. All I need is just to get the BB coverage information Regards Muhui Alexander Potapenko <glider at google.com>于2018年9月5日 周三下午6:57写道： > This is a known problem in SPECCPU2006, see > https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerFoundBugs > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 7:36 AM Muhui Jiang via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at

Hi Alex Thanks for your email. But it seems not work. I removed the -fsanitize=address flag. The global buffer overflow message doesn't show. However, no *.sancov file is created after I run perlbench. Thus, I could not get the BB coverage. Do you have any ideas? Many Thanks Regards Muhui Alexander Potapenko <glider at google.com> 于2018年9月5日周三 下午7:14写道： > Hi Muhui, > > If

I am enclosing scripts and config files to generate exact copy of CentOS 5.0 i386 installation DVD image, that is CentOS-5.0-i386-bin-DVD.iso if you have CD images for i386. If there is interest I can post the same for x86_64. Please follow README files for instructions. All the scripts are GPL. SHA1 for attached files: 439f7b0bd50722388a2836eedafeb1c227f97385 *00_README.txt

In compiling perlbench in SPEC2006 today, I get the following asm code: .4byte ($debug_loc2280) .4byte 1 .4byte PerlIO_fd_refcnt $set1406 = ($.bss_end)-PerlIO_fd_refcnt .4byte ($set1406) .4byte PerlIO_perlio $set1407 = ($.data_end)-PerlIO_perlio .4byte ($set1407) .4byte ($func_begin0) $set1408 = ($.text_end)-($func_begin0) .4byte

Below the trojaned and clean md5s are given. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 13:39:22 +0200 From: Magnus Bodin <magnus at bodin.org> To: Wojtek Pilorz <wpilorz at bdk.pl> Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org Subject: Re: openssh-3.4p1.tar.gz on ftp.openbsd.org changing rather than frozen On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 09:20:29AM +0200, Wojtek Pilorz wrote:

Full_Name: Nisai Wanakule Version: 1.7.1 OS: Solaris 2.9 Submission from: (NULL) (65.32.94.36) I tried to install RSPerl with --with-in-perl option and got some errors. R was built with --enable-R-shlib as indicated in the RSPerl instructions. Here is the list output during installation: nisai@lagrange:src 102$ R CMD INSTALL -c --configure-args='--with-in-perl' RSPerl_0.5-7.tar.gz *

I have seen that file ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/portable/openssh-3.4p1.tar.gz is continuosly changing. This seems strange to me as I expected it should be a 'frozen' file; The signature and diff file are still dated Jun 26. I am wondering whether this is intentional. Best regards, Wojtek

On 6/29/07, Wojtek.Pilorz <wpilorz at bdk.pl> wrote: > On Fedora6, I have noted the folowing problems when using cifs to connect to > NT shares: > > - cp -vip does not copy mtime; tar x does copy mtime > (it seems setting modtime by fname does work, setting by handle does not) > - when there is a share mounted from a NT/2000 server which is not used for long time >

On 2001-10-26 at 13:35:50 Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams at ubsw.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 02:11:13PM +0200, Markus Friedl wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 10:14:21AM +1000, Damien Miller wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Ed Phillips wrote: > > > > > > > What is the reasoning behind this? Do we want to see a lastlog entry for >

Dear All, Let me quote a few lines from TODO file (SNAP-20010109): - Linux hangs for 20 seconds when you do "sleep 20&exit". All current solutions break scp or leaves processes hanging around after the ssh connection has ended. It seems to be linked to two things. One select() under Linux is not as nice as others, and two the children of the shell are not killed on

hi before checking in that chown fix, i wanted you to take a look. tested on my workstation. basicaly the patch takes care that logtail saves the offset file with the correct permissions. when playing around lately with file tampering and those invoking logcheck as root. i got similar output to #253998 Alfie may point out that i should not invoke logcheck as root, but i better fix that before

firefox-1.5.0.2-2.1.c4.centos.i386.rpm in the testing repo produces this error when running it as non-rrot and also as root Firefox could not install this item because "install.rdf" (provided by the item) is not well formed or does not exist. Please contact the author about this problem. How to reproduce this message :- 1. download and upgrade firefox-1.5.0.2-2.1.c4.centos.i386.rpm

Either I'm having a case of "now you see it, now you don't" or I'm just plain stupid: When upgrading one of my 4.4-machines I discovered, that XEmacs (my text editor of choice; please no religious discussions) isn't part of the distribution anymore. OK. I progressed without it (and removed the old xemacs-packages because they were not working anymore). Then I installed

Hello All, Could someone check if the last squirrelmail rpm is available on Centos4 ? I check in a Centos4 server, but i find this: [root at linuxmail2 opt]# rpm -qi squirrelmail Name : squirrelmail Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 1.4.8 Vendor: CentOS Release : 5.el4.centos.3 Build Date: sam 24 jan 2009 02:07:58

Alle, I have installed and enabled (I think) the yum protectbase plugin: [cwfox at lurker ~]$ rpm -qa | grep -i protectbase yum-plugin-protectbase-1.1-1.c4 [cwfox at lurker ~]$ cat /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/protectbase.conf [main] enabled = 1 [cwfox at lurker ~]$ grep plugin /etc/yum.conf plugins=1 [cwfox at lurker ~]$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo <SNIP> [base]

Hello all, I've been googling and haven't found an answer. I have a Centos 4.6 box that is having an issue since the last yum update. The nss_ldap and kernel packages were the only packages installed/updated. When I try to run yum I now receive: [root at ns1 ~]# yum update There was a problem importing one of the Python modules required to run yum. The error leading to this problem was:

Hello, I was wondering what is the smallest install that anyone has managed with 4 (4.2 to be precise) ? I'm looking at a machine running as a VPN in a DMZ, so I'm going to remove/NOT INSTALL things like gcc, X, etc. I'm planning on putting this on a 1gb USB stick and booting from it. That reminds me, was there going to be a 1 CD server install image ? The other thing I noticed is