similar to: Winbind and AD: Local users with identical AD usernames

Hi Stefan, Am 20.06.23 um 13:33 schrieb Sabolowitsch, Stefan via samba: > Hi there, > i hope someone can help me with this question. > > we successfully got Samba 4.11 up and running with Winbind on our SLES 15.2. First thing 4.11 is far far out of service you should not use it in a production environment. Use 4.17 or better 4.18 > the Linux server is a member of the Windows

Hi Thanks for the tip, but i have tried that too. No go. The only thing right now that works is to omit S from /COPY:DATSO, ie skip security descriptors. Makes no sense but that's what I have found out after dozens of tests. I will recreate the shares and be careful to follow Rowlands advise on setting the correct rights on the share. m?n 19 juni 2023 kl. 23:42 skrev spindles7 via samba

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023, Ronan Pigott wrote: > This adds support for systemd socket-based activation in the ssh-agent. > When using socket activation, the -a flag value must match the socket > path provided by systemd, as a sanity check. Support for this feature is > enabled by the --with-systemd configure flag. > > --- > Something tells me upstream would not be interested in

Hi everyone, I've run into a bit of strange problem with implicit vs explicit printing and the call stack. I've included an example at the bottom of this email. The basic problem is that I have an S3 object with a print method. When the object is implicitly printed (ie. typed directly into the console) the function arguments in the call stack are exploded out to their actual values,

On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 10:13:53 +0100 Ralph Boehme via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 10/28/24 9:51 AM, lists--- via samba wrote: > > But we also have ancient systems, that use a local useraccount from > > the dataserver to put data on it. > > So, is something like: > > ??????? realm = REALM.TLD > > ??????? security = ADS > > ???????

when we try to join we get the following error message: Failed to join domain: failed to lookup DC info for domain #our-domain' over rpc:NT_STATUS_INVALID_NETWORK_RESPONSE looking up the dc and all SRV-Records is working. A "kinit administrator" is working to. Stefan Am 27.11.19 um 16:37 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 27/11/2019 14:37, Stefan Kania via samba wrote:

Hello, I try to compile Samba 4.11.6 on an old SLES11 machine. There is an old GNUTLS installed. Since I do not have root access and I have to use a newer GNUTLS-Version, I have installed gnutls-3.6.12 in a different location and set PKG_CONFIG_PATH appropriately. The configure script has run successfully, but when I run make (with verbose option), I get this error: 17:44:33 runner

Hello, since we install the most recent windows updates from 07/2023 Test-ComputerSecureChannel -Verbose show False [4]. Moved the machine to local workgroup, deleted machine account on the ad controller and rejoined it (which works), but Test-ComputerSecureChannel -Verbose show again False. I'm not sure this is an issue on the samba or on the windows side. Affected samba versions so far:

Good morning list, due to several changes we have to move from a pure local-users scenario to a member server scenario for our "public" data servers ("public" in terms of "all members of the chair" and "all machines"). The member server is running, managing access via group memberships works. We can't add any account to the ad, as we are only a user

I'm really confused about something. It seems like on my samba server the user AND GROUP permissions must match for me to access any files in my home directory. Here's an example of what I mean: ($ = at unix shell, > = in smbclient) $ mkdir ~dan/test1 $ chmod 700 ~dan/test1 $ smbclient -U dan //localhost/dan > cd test1 > put test1.txt (failure, NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED) > quit

Hi, I have been trying to use Winbindd in SLES 11 SP3 (Samba version 3.6.3-17.25.1) to fetch AD (Windows 2008 R2) identities into the Linux box and currently running into some problem w.r.t domain local groups and thought I could get some help here.. I have a two domain setup, in which DOMAIN1 is the parent domain and DOMAIN2 is the child domain. I have 2 users DOMAIN1\user1, DOMAIN2\user2 and

When I attempt to migrate a VM from one host to another (sles-xen-2 -> sles-xen-1) I get the error message: > sles-xen-2:~ # xm migrate --live SLES-11-SP2-1 192.168.1.3 > Error: can''t connect: [Errno 111] Connection refused > ... What might be the problem? FWIW: I''ve already verified that iptables rules have been cleared and that xend does not have any ports open

Hm, samba 4.11.2-13 is running on CentOS? 8. Im not really into CentOS/RH im more Debian/Ubuntu.. But I suggest you try this. Remove [homes] ( or keep it but add a new one. ) Setup [users] Path = /home browseable = yes read only = no Test again against that new share, but not with smbclient alone, setup a cifs mount and test and/or use a windows client pc. Preffered W10 or

I'm using ocfs2 and all modules from Suse (SLES9), no self compilations. Here are the details: * 32-bit machine (writing to ocfs2 partition/LUN and where the corruption was reported): Kernel: 2.6.5-7.257-bigsmp #1 SMP i686 i386 GNU/Linux OCFS2 rpms: ocfs2console-1.2.1-4.2 ocfs2-tools-1.2.1-4.2 o2cb_ctl -V: o2cb_ctl version 1.2.1 /etc/init.d/o2cb status: Module "configfs":

OK, further to my previous message I've configured BIND, but when I try to run samba_dnsupdate I get the following: Nov 18 16:19:23 sles-shire named[6112]: samba b9_putrr: unhandled record type 0 Nov 18 16:19:24 sles-shire named[6112]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone _msdcs.main.adlab.netdirect.ca Nov 18 16:19:24 sles-shire named[6112]: samba_dlz: disallowing update of

Hi all! The 22nd International User and Developer Conference sambaXP will take place from 9th - 11th of May 2020 in G?ttingen, Germany. https://sambaxp.org/ New for this year's event: the Microsoft Interoperability Track on day 2. Looking forward to meet you there! -slow -- Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/ SerNet Samba Team Lead

On 7/14/23 07:42, Daniel M?ller wrote: > Where to get the patch? > We are running samba 4.17.4 on debian11 . We compiled from source. it's linked in the bugreport https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15418 <https://cpaste.org/?df0494cac0063e2e#Cx69G684EBPQ71S6sAUVXSYburgV6gPyKHfPSbfmHZPJ> Hth! -slow -- Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/

Dear Samba users and hackers, I'm excited to announce that SambaXP 2025 will take place on April 9th and 10th on-site in G?ttingen, Germany once again. This annual event promises to bring together Samba enthusiasts and experts for an interesting and enjoyable two-day conference. Early-Bird Tickets are now available here: https://sambaxp.org/ The call for papers is already open and we

I am experiencing a weird issue with samba when I am trying to configure it as a Domain Controller. I'm using Gentoo Linux, and after finally figuring that kdb5_util was looking for the krb5.conf file where Gentoo didn't put it, I was able to initialize the realm with kdb5_util create. But now when I try to start samba (the actual Samba process, not smb) it pulls kerberos and kerberos

On 10/28/2020 3:31 AM, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Dan Egli via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > >> Why on earth would samba even CARE about group permissions when user >> permissions are perfectly fine? Help me fix this? > Consider that, if POSIX ACL are enabled on this FS, the group > permission are considered as a 'mask' for all ACL, with