similar to: Getting kernel source for 2.6.9-42.ELsmp

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Getting kernel source for 2.6.9-42.ELsmp"

2007 Feb 17
3
CentOS (2.6.9-42.0.8.ELsmp) and CentOS (2.6.9-42.0.8.EL)
List, I am experimenting with a Dual processor Supermicro and plan to use CentOS 5 when it is released. In the meantime I have installed Centos 4.4. Sorry for asking such a basic question but what is the difference between CentOS (2.6.9-42.0.8.ELsmp) and CentOS (2.6.9-42.0.8.EL) Both kernels have been installed, but I have not been able to find which one is best to use for what purposes.
2006 Sep 25
1
2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp
Hi, I currently have a few CentOs 4.X servers running the latest stock 2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp kernel. I notice kernel.org are now up to version 2.6.18 and many people are using the 2.6.17.11 Does anyone have any opinions with regards to the 17.11 and .18 kernels? I'm led to believe the latest centos stock kernels are the same anyway as are the backported Redhat ones. I'd be interested to
2005 Jun 13
2
recompile 1 kernel modules
How do I recomile just 1 kernel module. I want to recompile serial/8250.c I tried typing make in the serial directory but that did not do it? Thanks, Jerry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050613/c580926e/attachment-0003.html>
2006 Sep 12
4
2.6.9-42.ELsmp kernel and 3ware 9550 tools
I have the latest kernel with the drivers for my 3ware 9550SX built in. Where can I find the tools and monitoring apps for this card? Are there rpms hiding somewhere, or do I need to build it from source? -- Bowie
2004 Dec 31
1
2.4.21-27.0.1.ELsmp & megaraid2 problem
I've found a problem with CentOS 3 latest kernel (2.4.21-27.0.1.ELsmp) and megaraid2 driver. Hardware: Dell PE1600SC with CERC ATA100 RAID controller The problem is somewhat similar, but not identical as: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123289 After updating new glibc and kernel packages the new kernel don't boot. Boot fails to mount root fs with "Cannot open
2006 Jan 20
1
Kernel 2.6.9-22.0.2.ELsmp
Has anyone had any issues with this latest kernel? We rebooted our servers into this new kernel yesturday and our internet conectivity broke. I fiddled arround with some of the setting to get our machines talking to the net again with no success. It seems that we are able to talk to local hosts on our network, but anything external is broken. I gave up in the end and resorted to the previous
2006 Nov 27
1
Centos-4.3: Filelocking problems under high [network related] load with kernel 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp
Hi, first of all, please CC me on any reply, as I am only subscribed to the digest. OK. Here is the problem. Said kernel (from 4.4) seems to have problems with file-locking when the system is under high, likely network related, load. The symptoms are things using file locking (rpm, the user-space automounter amd) fail to obtain locks, usually stating timeout problems. The sytem in question is
2007 Nov 28
2
kernel-2.6.9-55.0.12.EL not booting (lvm? 3ware?)
Hi, Here's he setup. Original Kernel: kernel-smp-2.6.9-42.EL, booting fine. Error with kernel-2.6.9-55.0.12.EL (and kernel-2.6.9-55.0.12.ELsmp) No volume groups found Volume group "VolGroup00" not found. ERROR: /bin/lvm exited abnormally! The system has a 3ware 9000 Storage Controller Model: 9500S-4LP Firmware FE9X 2.08.00.006, BIOS BE9X 2.03.01.052, Ports: 4. Anyone seen
2006 Sep 07
2
Kernel ELsmp vs EL
Hi all, I'm not very used to CentOS and Linux generally speaking, though I read a lot and 'man' quickly became a very good friend of mine, right after Google, so sorry if that's a ridiculous one! (at least it'll give you a good laugh!) I updated the kernel to 2.6.9-42.0.2 recently and that raised a question... Simple... Yet silly...! What exactly is the difference between
2006 Sep 17
1
Centos 4.4 Install bug
To the Centos maintainers: We tried to install Centos 4.4 i386 (i686 / Athlon) on a Dual Opteron 254 Iwill DK8N MB, 1GB (4 x 256M) system with a 3ware 9500S-4 and 4 x 80 GB disks in a RAID 10 array. Both tries caused Centos to first kernel panic until we turned off IO-APIC in the BIOS. Both tries also only loaded the UP kernel and did not load the smp kernel on the machine. The smp kernel was
2006 Sep 13
4
benchmarking large RAID arrays
I'm just wondering what folks are using to benchmark/tune large arrays these days. I've always used bonnie with file sizes 2-3 times physical RAM. Maybe there's a better way? Cheers,
2008 Apr 12
2
Wherefore is FUSE?
Tonight, I tried to roll out fuse on my CentOS 4 production system. (in order to use GlusterFS) I have two identical servers, and one took, the other didn't. How simple could this be? # yum install yum-plugin-priorities # yum install rpmforge-release # yum install fuse dkms-fuse both of these seem to work. Yet I run [root at kepler drivers]# modprobe fuse FATAL: Module fuse not
2007 Jan 25
4
mount initrd
Hi, I try to mount the file /boot/initrd-2.6.9-42.ELsmp but I have a error [root at localhost ~]# cp /boot/initrd-2.6.9-42.ELsmp.img /root/ [root at localhost ~]# mv initrd-2.6.9-42.ELsmp.img initrd-2.6.9-42.ELsmp.gz [root at localhost ~]# gunzip initrd-2.6.9-42.ELsmp.gz [root at localhost ~]# mount initrd-2.6.9-42.ELsmp /tmp -o loop [root at localhost ~]# mount: you must specify the
2008 Feb 18
1
kernel-devel: compile MPP/RDAC kernel module
Hi Centos Users I am running Centos 4.6 wit latest updates. For I/O multipathing I need to use kernel 2.6.9-55 (IBM support matrix). Trying to compile Engenio Linux RDAC Driver[0] I fail to install kernel-devel for this exact kernel (with up2date). Up2date always installs the newest. # make clean make V=1 -C/lib/modules/2.6.9-55.ELsmp/build M=/root/tmp/linuxrdac-09.02.B5.15
2008 Jun 24
2
Invalid argument while mounting
I get the following error when trying to mount: Nothing changed (in any case not that I know of). I get the same error from both nodes. Please assist. # mount /u02 mount.ocfs2: Invalid argument while mounting /dev/sdd1 on /u02. Check 'dmesg' for more information on this error. /etc/fstab: /dev/sdd1 /u02 ocfs2 _netdev,datavolume,nointr 0 0
2007 Apr 27
0
How to get arcnet working with other-than-root accounts?
Hello! I've successfully gotten the arcnet driver compiled and installed into a Centos kernel. Admittedly, with a lot of help. Currently, I'm using the following script to get arcnet up and running: cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/kernel-2.6.9/linux-2.6.9/drivers/net/arcnet insmod arcnet.ko insmod arc-rawmode.ko insmod com20020.ko insmod com20020-pci.ko node=3 device=arc0 timeout=3
2007 Oct 06
1
GFS-kernel module - Version Magic Error
Are the RPMs for the latest GFS kernel module GFS-kernel-2.6.9-72.2.0.8 to be used with the version 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL available ? I tried to compile the Source RPMs available from the Red Hat site but the modules can't be loaded because of invalid module format arising from version magic issues. The syslog shows: node0 kernel: gfs: version magic '2.6.9-55.0.9.ELsmp SMP 686 REGPARM
2007 Jan 15
3
WinXP don't boot
Hi all, I've installed CentOS 4.4 in a box which previously had dual boot (XP SP2 and Ubuntu) I can run CentOS without problem but I can't boot XP SP2. When I try it the system simply hangs... [root at seth ~]# fdisk -l Disco /dev/hdb: 40.0 GB, 40020664320 bytes 255 cabezas, 63 sectores/pista, 4865 cilindros Unidades = cilindros de 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disposit. Boot Start
2008 Dec 05
5
Adding RAM
I have a server running Centos 4.7 32bit. Will moving from 4Gig of RAM to 8Gig do any good? Since its 32bit I assume it will only be able to address the first 4Gig not? When I installed CentOS I did not do anything special to enable using more then 4Gig if thats required. Exim, spamassassin and Clamd seem to be the biggest load on this machine. My biggest bottle neck is disk I/O anyway. Wish
2006 Mar 04
2
CentOS 4.2: kernel version
Hello Installing sw on a CentOS 4.2 (iso version) I notice that the kernel version is 2.6.9-22.0.1.Elsmp in RH4 UP2 the kernel version is 2.6.9-22.Elsmp Some sw complain and check the kernel version. Why this specific version extension 0.1 ? Thanks for your help Sorry if this question was already asked. Jean-Pierre Castello -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was