similar to: MS Exchange storage on ZFS?

Hi Guys, I started a lxc container with libvit in ubuntu Operating system, and succeed using lxc-enter-namespace to enter the namespaces and security context of the container. But when I do the same thing in debian OS, It reported an error, with details as following: root@debian:/etc# vir list Id Name State ---------------------------------------------------- 4424

I''ve installed debian lenny amd64, it is frozen now. I''ve install kernel for xen support but it doesn''t start. It says "you need to load kernel first" but I''ve installed all the packages concerning xen, also packages related to the kernel. Perhaps lenny doesn''t support xen anymore? Any solution?

OS is smeserver, based on CentOS/RHEL 4. After update to samba 3.0.25b (included in RHEL U6) users who had "mapped" their home in Network places were unable to access the share. All other shares worked. On every attempt a line similar to the following was logged: Feb 14 10:11:49 nethservice smbd[6258]: '/home/e-smith/files/users/FRANCESCA/home' does not exist or permission

Hi there Is it fair to compare the 2 solutions using Solaris 10 U2 and a commercial database (SAP SD scenario). The cache on the HW raid helps, and the CPU load is less... but the solution costs more and you _might_ not need the performance of the HW RAID. Has anybody with access to these units done a benchmark comparing the performance (and with the pricelist in hand) came to a conclusion.

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 05:49:28PM +0800, hzguanqiang wrote: > Hi Guys, > I started a lxc container with libvit in ubuntu Operating system, and succeed using lxc-enter-namespace to enter the namespaces and security context of the container. But when I do the same thing in debian OS, It reported an error, with details as following: > > root@debian:/etc# vir list > Id Name

Hello list, I'm not sure what to look for here, not sure if what I'm seeing is the actual "backlog" (that we need to make sure is empty while performing a rolling upgrade before going to the next node), how can I tell, while reading this, if it's okay to reboot / upgrade my next node in the pool ? Here is what I do for checking : for i in `gluster volume list`; do

Greetings, In looking for inexpensive JBOD and/or RAID solutions to use with ZFS, I''ve run across the recent "VTrak" SAS/SATA systems from Promise Technologies, specifically their E-class and J-class series: E310f FC-connected RAID: http://www.promise.com/product/product_detail_eng.asp?product_id=175 E310s SAS-connected RAID:

Dave Close wrote: > The error shown with "ssh -Xvvv" in all failure cases is, > debug3: send packet: type 91 > debug2: X11 auth data does not match fake data. > X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. > debug2: X11 rejected 1 i0/o0 I don't know but I do have questions. So maybe... What is the output of these commands? type xauth

Mine also has a list of files that seemingly never heal. They are usually isolated on my arbiter bricks, but not always. I would also like to find an answer for this behavior. -----Original Message----- From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Hoggins! Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 12:26 PM To: gluster-users <gluster-users at

Hello, I migrated 140 users and computer accounts from NT4 to Samba 3.0.14 with ldap today. Smbldap-tools are the latest stable version from tarball. No errors during vampire and everyone came over and the groups and group memberships populated fine. We couldn't connect to the server as any user from client PC's. The smbldaptools were set to use SSHA encryption for password attribute

Am 2017-07-11 um 14:57 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> # smbclient \\\\server\\daten -Usgw%PW >> session setup failed: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL > > Restart all the Samba binaries on the DM > > Then check that the OS knows your user with: > > getent passwd sgw libnss_winbind was missing! Now both results are the same user-names in /etc/passwd ... rmed now I was 100%

I'll jump in here to say we'll try your suggestion, but I guess what's not been mentioned is that we get the setroubleshoot abrt's only a few times a day, but we're getting 10000s of setroubleshoot messages in /var/log/messages a day. e.g. Dec 2 10:03:55 server audispd: queue is full - dropping event Dec 2 10:04:00 server audispd: last message repeated 199 times Dec 2

Mark: Labels look OK, restorecon has nothing to do, and: -rwxr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 /bin/ps dr-xr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:proc_t:s0 /proc I'll send the audit log on to Dan. Cheers, John On 2 December 2014 at 16:10, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com> wrote: > Could you send me a copy of your audit.log. > > You should not be

Indeed, thanks Dan - it doesn't get us to a completely clean running that would allow us to run our Node app as we are under Passenger with SELinux enforcing, but it at least has stopped the excessive amount of AVCs we were getting. John On 3 December 2014 at 10:01, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com> wrote: > Looks like turning on three booleans will solve most of the problem.

At the point of this section *http://ruby.railstutorial.org/chapters/sign-up#sec-signup_failure*<http://ruby.railstutorial.org/chapters/sign-up#sec-signup_failure> clicking the "Create my account" button on the signup form shows the following image at <http://ruby.railstutorial.org/images/figures/signup_failure_rails_4.png> According to the tutorial, I must modify

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Aris Adamantiadis <aris at 0xbadc0de.be> wrote: [snip] > I've worked this week on an alternative key exchange mechanism, in > reaction to the whole NSA leaks and claims over cryptographic backdoors > and/or cracking advances. The key exchange is in my opinion the most > critical defense against passive eavesdropping attacks. > I believe

Looking to make some changes to an old but working LAN, that has about 10 samba servers serving printers and network shares and a NT 4 PDC server with Exchange 5.5 on it. The samba servers are members of the nt4 domain, XP systems are members of the nt 4 domain also. Samba servers are ldapbacked. We use the ldap component directly to login to the Linux servers. I'd like to be able to

Hello, Kevin Way wrote: > I'm curious if there are technical (or other) reasons that prevent > FreeBSD from adding RFC 4462 (GSSAPI Key Exchange) support to sshd. > The MIT Kerberos team first requested this four years ago, and > implementation patches have been available for years at: > http://www.sxw.org.uk/computing/patches/openssh.html > > The author of those

Anyone know a good Linux client for Exchange that is MAPI based and not IMAP based? Using Evolution, but going from Outlook/MAPI to this is not fun? Thanks! jlc

Hello, First my apologies .. I have had the flu for days and I am still groggy .. So when I replied the whole message it must have been the drugs in my system .. :-) Second my apologies .. Steve had answered this question already quite well along the same lines as myself .. I just had not read BOTH digests first .. Francesca C. Smith Lady Linux Internet Services 1801 Bolton Street # 1