similar to: SaMBa 4.16.4 adds users to ACLs as groups

Thank you for the answer. I understand that default (POSIX) ACLs will lead to similar results, but the parent directory of this file had no default ACL, and when opening its properties / security dialog I also don't see any inheritance specified. However I can accept that SaMBa works this way and I can even see that Word did some deliberate ACL manipulation, but this "piling up" of

Hi everybody, im new here, and I have problem. Im running samba 3beta3 at gentoo linux. Do anybody know how to resolve something like this: There are three groups in AD group_a, and group_b and group_c Members of group_a are user_0, user_1, user_2 Members of group_b are user_3, user_4, user_5 Members of group_c are user_6 and group_b If i try to do getent group At my linux box i got

Well, i add new configuration in my smb.conf. I try connecting in shared backup, this work with authentication, in shared printers, It prints with anonymous users and when I insert one valid ad user, it prints and displays the following error: "Idle - "Session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE" Another doubt, in directory /var/spool/samba/, no have files, This folder should not

Hi all, I have a problem setting ACL on a share like below: /data /user /user_1 /user_2 /user_ ... Particularry if I want to get complete control to a user on his personal folder but get off any permission to Everyone group also this user (that belongs to Everyone) cannot list and access to his folder. When I was connected to NT4 server I didn't have this kind of problem. I have check

Hi I am using Rsync locally on some machines, however, there are a few machines that require me to backup over FTP, the current system I have in place is very very slow, and I would like to hire someone on this list familiar with backups ($50 sound fine?) and having it run of cron To create me a backup script that works on Rsync to backup specific files/folders on server1 and ssh or ftp to

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:05:20 -0300 Luiz Guilherme Nunes Fernandes <narutospinal at gmail.com> wrote: > Well, i add new configuration in my smb.conf. I try connecting in > shared backup, this work with authentication, in shared printers, It > prints with anonymous users and when I insert one valid ad user, it > prints and displays the following error: "Idle - "Session

Well, i use samba wiki tutorial, well my actually config: I use winbind for work with getent searchs. In network no package sssd installed. I start services winbind, smbd and nmbd Well, really, about the confusion, I did not understand what you meant. The other config are not changed, they are the same ones when you helped the problems of the kerberos. Last detail, with shared backup, i test

On 15/06/2023 16:18, Tam?s N?meth via samba wrote: Hi Tamas, I have been reviewing you numerous posts on this list about this project, are you aware that you have been posting for 6 months ? In your last post there was this: [quote] this "piling up" of ACL information doesn't happen either on a native Windows file server or with vfs_acl_xattr [/quote] Does this mean you do not

Dear, I really do not know, what is wrong. Remembering, I add a linux in active directory domain and I need to add local printers shared with AD authentication. My tutorial and errors ######################################## # Install Packages yum install perl gcc attr libacl-devel libblkid-devel gnutls-devel readline-devel python-devel gdb pkgconfig krb5-workstation zlib-devel

Okay then :-( I think I'll have to divide our shares into two categories: 1. One with "nt acl support = no" which I'd consider the "pure Linux security" category. 2. Probably another category with "acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes", as a "pure Windows security" category. It would be better to have an underlying OS with native NFSv4 ACL support

What are people''s opinions on which of these two styles is better to use? 1) before --------------------------- module UserSpecHelper include GenericSpecHelper def valid_sms_attributes(phone_number="12345") { :phone_number => phone_number } end end describe User, "with phone number" do include UserSpecHelper before(:each) do @user =

On 16/06/2023 16:20, Tam?s N?meth via samba wrote: > Dear Rowland, > > I'm trying to write a single email answering all the question of your > recent emails: > > >> Hi Tamas, I have been reviewing you numerous posts on this list about >> this project, are you aware that you have been posting for 6 months ? > > Well, not exactly :-) Only 5 months and 5

Guys, I have a need to support as has_many/belongs_to relationship on a legacy(kind of) schema. The reason I say kind of is that the schema does have "id" columns that are used in many associations, but this particular has_many/belongs_to association needs to support different ones. I''ve attached to code at the end of this email. Suffice it to say I need to use the standard

Dear Rowland, I'm trying to write a single email answering all the question of your recent emails: > Hi Tamas, I have been reviewing you numerous posts on this list about > this project, are you aware that you have been posting for 6 months ? Well, not exactly :-) Only 5 months and 5 days :-) However, this specific thread is only 9 days old. I had a few mails in january, february,

Does anybody have any insight into what could be causing this strange problem? I have Samba 3.02 (sorry, can't upgrade right now). My Linux box is running Mandrake 10 Official. I have Samba configured as a PDC. I can successfully add machines to my Domain -- and log on as ANY user from ANY machine. However on a SINGLE MACHINE, when I log on as USER_1 and access that user's roaming

Dear All! (As I wrote earlier) I'm working on removing an ancient (3.2.5) SaMBa member server from an Active Directory domain, and replacing it with SaMBa 4.16.4 running on AlmaLinux 9. The domain controllers are Windows servers, and the old SaMBa is joined to the domain with "security = domain" type of security (the old NT4 type). I'm afraid once I remove the old server from

Hello List, I have a problem with the client Roundcube. Whenever I save a draft to the Folder INBOX.Drafts a old mail in my INBOX will be marked as unread. Here are the IMAP Logs from Roundcube and Dovecot debug logs. I have no idea why it happens. The IMAP protocol looks normal to me but as you can see in the second to last line in the Dovecot log Dovecot is changing the flag of an old E-Mail

Hi, I have a problem with running puppet with hiera based data. I am trying to cleanup user accounts on a range of servers (to have the same uid/gid). When I create existing account but with different uid/gid it doesn''t change files group ownership so I need to run a script which cleanups after cleanup ;-) I use the following code: --- :backends: - yaml :hierarchy: -

Hi, I just tried the below with the current version 1.0 RC15 (from the dovecot website) and I still got the Problem: telnet gives me the following output: -----8<-----8<-----8<-----SNIP-----8<-----8<-----8<----- +OK dovecot ready.u-ERR invalid command u s-ERR invalid command s e-ERR invalid command e r-ERR invalid command r -ERR invalid command u-ERR invalid command u s-ERR

Hi, I just tried the below with the current version 1.0 RC15 and I still got the Problem: telnet gives me the following output: -----8<-----8<-----8<-----SNIP-----8<-----8<-----8<----- +OK dovecot ready.u-ERR invalid command u s-ERR invalid command s e-ERR invalid command e r-ERR invalid command r -ERR invalid command u-ERR invalid command u s-ERR invalid command s e-ERR